China naval drills in East China Sea

solarz

Brigadier
you just try to justify chinese shadow the kitty hawk vs japan case is not the same, but we all know its same things. as i recall the sub was also near japan water.

if chinese navy was in international water, japanese navy was also in international i don't see whats wrong with it. since chinese did the same with other countries. I'm sure chinese navy know japan was following them.

You seem to forget that it's not the Chinese who first complained, it was the Japanese.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
i didn't forget it was the japs who compalin 1st. my point was to hendrik regarding the navy shaow things

I am trying to explain the logic behind the Helicopter buzzing. As I say before Japan has no business and no reason to tailgate the Chinese Navy.

How would you feel if someone tailgate you on highway? So you would be annoyed don't you because it is dangerous.

So Chinese respond is normal and no need for Japan to whine. If you want to play the game then accept the consequence,The other side will respond

Chinese submarine encounter with Kitty Hawk is still shrouded in mystery.If Chinese submarine tailgate the US Navy, they should be detected after all US Navy with their super duper gear should have no problem detecting noisy and backward submarine

Then the escort ship can ping the submarine and tell them to get loss or else.
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Junior Member
I am trying to explain the logic behind the Helicopter buzzing. As I say before Japan has no business and no reason to tailgate the Chinese Navy.

How would you feel if someone tailgate you on highway? So you would be annoyed don't you because it is dangerous.

So Chinese respond is normal and no need for Japan to whine. If you want to play the game then accept the consequence,The other side will respond

Chinese submarine encounter with Kitty Hawk is still shrouded in mystery.If Chinese submarine tailgate the US Navy, they should be detected after all US Navy with their super duper gear should have no problem detecting noisy and backward submarine

Then the escort ship can ping the submarine and tell them to get loss or else.

like i said before, i'm sure chinese shadow foreign navy before too, so you don't have to complain about it when chinese do the same thing. chinese navy was in internation water, but close to japan, of course japan will send ships to check it out(if not for intel gather too).

The US will not tell them to get losss or such. the us was doing this kind of game during cold war, both soviet and US sub/ships came withing each country Economic zone. in those case US just monitor the sub from safe distance.

anyway i'm derail the topic. i don't think jap need to complain about the choper and chinese shouldn't complain about the shadow navy either. these things happen often.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
like i said before, i'm sure chinese shadow foreign navy before too, so you don't have to complain about it when chinese do the same thing. chinese navy was in internation water, but close to japan, of course japan will send ships to check it out(if not for intel gather too).

The US will not tell them to get losss or such. the us was doing this kind of game during cold war, both soviet and US sub/ships came withing each country Economic zone. in those case US just monitor the sub from safe distance.

anyway i'm derail the topic. i don't think jap need to complain about the choper and chinese shouldn't complain about the shadow navy either. these things happen often.

Let it be clear .It is the Japanese that complaint first. Certainly you have the right to shadow your perceived foe but you can do it more discreetly. That is the reason you have MPA(Maritime Patrol Aircraft) and Spy Ship disguised as Hydrography research ship and manned by civilian.

That is what China and US does

Sending warships to shadow a fleet in international water, is making a statement and unnecessary provocation and when the other side response Japan cry foul. Anyway we should end this discussion
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
PLAN East Sea Fleet Moves Beyond First Island Chain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By: Russell Hsiao

PLAN Naval Maneuver
The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) recently carried out its annual exercises far from China's coastal waters. The flotillas of naval warships were reportedly deployed on an unprecedented scale, seemingly to demonstrate China's emergence as a full-fledged blue water navy that is willing and capable of projecting its power into the Western Pacific. According to Japanese Defense Ministry sources cited by the Yomiuri Shimbun, the PLAN's East Sea Fleet was engaged in training exercises from April 7 to April 9 involving a total of 10 warships and submarines, including Sovremenny guided missile destroyers. The flotilla traveled from the East China Sea through the Okinawa Islands and Miyako Strait to waters off the disputed Okinotori Islands—the southernmost point in Japan—in the Western Pacific Ocean without any prior notification to Tokyo, where it conducted anti-submarine warfare exercises (Yomiuri Shimbun [Japan], April 27).

According to Japanese sources, the 10-vessel strong flotilla consisted of two kilo class subs, two guided missile destroyers, and three corvettes, among others. The Chinese flotilla was identified between Okinawa and Miyako Islands while in international waters on April 11, where it conducted supply exercises on the southern waters of Okinawa, and on the noon of April 13 the flotilla reached an area near the disputed Okinotori Islands, which is strategically located at the midpoint between Taiwan and Guam. The disputed territory lies at a militarily significant point, and it is alleged that in recent years Chinese vessels have been mapping the ocean's bottom covering areas U.S. warships might pass en route to Taiwan (Ta Kung Pao [Hong Kong], April 21; ETaiwannews, April 27; Christian Science Monitor, January 8).

The East Sea Fleet exercise reflects the progress of the Chinese navy in executing its evolving naval strategy, and the remarkable pace of PLA naval modernization that has accelerated in recent years. The PLA Daily described the navy's latest action as an exercise designed to deploy its warships in distant waters. "Other parties should not speculate [about] the flotilla's intentions since training in international waters [is] an international practice," the People's Daily reported the statement as saying (People's Daily Online, April 15).

In an interview with Xinhua News Agency, Rear Admiral Zhang Huachen, deputy commander of the East Sea Fleet, announced: “With our naval strategy changing now, we are going from coastal defense to far sea defense.” “With the expansion of the country’s economic interests, the navy wants to better protect the country’s transportation routes and the safety of our major sea lanes,” he added. “In order to achieve this, the Chinese Navy needs to develop along the lines of bigger vessels and with more comprehensive capabilities” (New York Times, April 24).

Indeed, the route taken by the East Sea Fleet was in international waters and the exercise appeared to follow the line of a three-stage strategy in PLAN modernization, which was laid out in the White Paper on China’s National Defense in 2008. According to the White Paper, the navy has been “developing capabilities of conducting cooperation in distant waters and countering non-traditional security threats, so as to push forward the overall transformation of the service” since the beginning of this century (Global Times [China], April 24, 2009).

"First, it [PLAN] aims to develop a relatively modernized naval force capable of operating within the first island chain—a series of islands that stretch from Japan to the north, to Taiwan, and to the Philippines in the south. The second step aims to develop a regional naval force that can operate beyond the first island chain to reach the second island chain that includes Guam, Indonesia and Australia. And in the third-stage, the navy plans to develop a global force by the mid-21st century" (Global Times, April 24, 2009).

Viewed in light of its naval strategy, the recent PLAN exercise demonstrates the progress of the East Sea Fleet's operational capabilities since it clearly indicates that the Chinese Navy is a modernized naval force capable of operating beyond the first island chain. Furthermore, the success of this exercise would suggest that the PLAN is seeking to extend its operational reach to the “second island chain" as its logical next step.

Military exercises are an important feature of Chinese military doctrine and often offer important strategic insight into Chinese intentions and capabilities. Analysis on the East Sea Fleet exercise in the Chinese press has emphasized the fact that China is no longer afraid to assert its freedom to navigate on the high seas, namely cruising past the U.S. military base in Okinawa. Although PLAN exercises have passed through the island chain before, this is the first time that such an exercise involved such a complex array of warships and submarines. The complexity of the exercises was also reflected in the multiple mid-air refueling operations deployed for Chinese squadrons of J-10, J-7 and J-8 aircraft, which requires a sophisticated level of command and control operations (Ta Kung Pao, April 21). These complex operations clearly demonstrate the PLAN's maturing capabilities to undertake and sustain coordinated air and naval operations far from the Chinese mainland. Moreover, it also indicates China’s intent to protect its core interests within the first island chain. Perhaps more importantly, the East Sea Fleet exercise may have been an important signal to the United States that the Chinese Navy is no longer barred by the first island chain, and that China is prepared to freely navigate the Western Pacific (V.Ifeng.com [Hong Kong], April 15; Ta Kung Pao, April 21; Et33.blog.china.com, April 27; Liberty Times [Taiwan], April 25).
 

Engineer

Major
You are factually incorrect and being inconsistent as ever.
Just because you see yourself that way, that doesn't means everybody else behaves in the same way.

As it so happens this thread, by the nature of the topic, contains undertones of a political nature all of its own. Many of the threads I participate in are of a similar mould and had also gone political before my participation in the thread.
If you automatically associate a thread with politics just by reading its title, then it means you are using the wrong mentality in this message board. When you start out with a mind set of participating in political debates, then of course you see everything having undertones of politics.

You are correct in saying that some threads already became political debates before you participate, but all threads that you have participated in became some form of political debates, which illustrates the nature of the problem.

Sure over the years I've had a critical viewpoint on matters concerning China in things such as Predatory Trade Practices, IPT, , Rule of Law, Poor Quality Products, Enviromental Degradation, Covert and Overt acquisitions of many a nature to name a few.
That's pretty much every instance, eh? In other words, you nitpicking everything and criticize China about it regardless of the circumstances.

The cases against China in the given eg's in most instances has been more than proven from third party sources.
False. You started out with a wrong mindset, and then look for sources to prove your assumption. You even go as far as making strawman out of other people's post to build your "case".

As Jantxv said, this is a global forum and one is not required to pander to Chinese sentiments nor denigrate them.
This is a global form but that doesn't mean it is open to trolling.
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
PLAN East Sea Fleet Moves Beyond First Island Chain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That is a cheer for China... however, as seen, the aircrafts had to go through multiple refuelling to effectively provide the ships with the needed aerial coverage. This will not last... without aircraft carriers to carry the fighters... China's navy cannot fully exploit their capability.

Thus even up till now, I think (my own opinion, only), China's navy is still a no-threat to which ever powers beyond the first island chain.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
That is a cheer for China... however, as seen, the aircrafts had to go through multiple refuelling to effectively provide the ships with the needed aerial coverage. This will not last... without aircraft carriers to carry the fighters... China's navy cannot fully exploit their capability.

Thus even up till now, I think (my own opinion, only), China's navy is still a no-threat to which ever powers beyond the first island chain.

Can we assume that China is prepping for her carrier battle group with this naval exercise?
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Can we assume that China is prepping for her carrier battle group with this naval exercise?

Not sure about the actual intention of the exercise. But it might be possible, since their first aircraft carrier gonna be ready in a few years time and it is high time to start training her escorts to operate faraway from mainland China.
 
Top