Cheap drones would a very good way to soak up any stinger fire.More confirmation that Russia asked China for help.
Tactical and MALE drones will come in very handy as long as they stay out of MANPAD range.
Cheap drones would a very good way to soak up any stinger fire.More confirmation that Russia asked China for help.
Tactical and MALE drones will come in very handy as long as they stay out of MANPAD range.
it is not some hidden thing. for over a year permanent equipment was moved there. Putin wanted public attention to raise prices of commodities. he met publicly with tactical corporation CEO. its very rare case during pandemic meet a person lower in corporate structure and he remind him of Erdogan. and that person boasted earlier of about $4b revenues at than exchange rate. $4B revenue your looking at minimum 20,000 PGMs and cruise missiles per year.(Assuming that the intel is true) I think its fair to say that the Intel leak is from the Russian side.
We started having intel reports about Russian Ukraine intentions from Spring last year. Then there was the whole end-of-year until war started where intel was leaking like crazy by the Russian side
Yeah. I will add that so far I did not even see any evidence of Russian paratrooper drops with parachute.Just a reminder, only trained paratrooper could fold a parachute, and during the folding process everyone needs to check the condition of the parachute,coording and backpack. It is not a factory made thingy that came in a box , you pick it up and jump from the aircraft with it.
There is no way the Russians would have the time to train drone operators with Chinese military drone equipment. I agree.As for the drones, if I remember correctly, the Azerbaijani military's drones were mainly operated by Turkish personal. Assuming this claim is true, Chinese personal would have to operate them unless the Russian military have been secretly training people to operate Chinese drones.
Well China imported food from the West because they needed to get something from the West in return for all the crap they produce for them. Since high technology imports are being restricted things like food were the only thing they had left. Otherwise when Uncle Sam defaults on its debt by "confiscating" Chinese held US treasuries and dollar reserves, or assets abroad, like they did with Russia, Venezuela, etc, you will end up as a sucker who worked for free for Uncle Sam.Why is importing more food from West a bad idea? It was one of the few ways for China to import more and not have that level of bullseye. They can always export more of their own production or import more from other countries in the event of a sanction.
They should buy this from CETC, they already sanctioned by the U.S.
This analysis is truly awful, not least of all in the simply laughable notion that, by abandoning Russia, China would dampen the anti-China shift in the USA and elsewhere. What does the author imagine is driving current USA-China dynamics? It is certainly not the "democracy vs. autocracy" framework that is fed to the western masses and is apparently reproduced in the author's argument. It is fundamentally about the threat that the rise of China poses to American hegemony, a threat that would exist irrespective of China's form of government and irrespective of its relations with other nations. There are meaningful nuances within this dynamic, and within these nuances lie the prospects for war and peace, prosperity and suffering, but the basic dynamic of increasing tension can only be resolved by winding the clock back on generations of Chinese progress.
What is the worst-case scenario for China in this crisis? It is a collapse of the current Russian regime and its replacement with a US puppet regime that will complete the encirclement of China. China's efforts must be directed to avoiding such an outcome, which in practice means mitigating against the collapse of the present regime. That does not mean unconditional support for Russia, it does not mean that China cannot play a "constructive" role in managing the present crisis, nor does it mean that China has an interest in Putin, specifically, surviving, but it certainly means that China should not "stab Russia in the back".
EDIT: It if were actually true that, by "stabbing Russia in the back", China could significantly defuse escalating tensions with the USA even if only temporarily (say, for the next 15 years) and roll back unwelcome developments such as the "Quad", restrictions on technology imports/exports/etc. then China's path would be clear: stab Russia in the back. But the notion is simply ludicrous. The world does not work that way. At best, the enemy of my enemy is tolerated until I can get around to stabbing them in the back as well.
They aren't getting their reserves back. If there is sonething the west loves more than other peoples resources, it is other peoples money.giving back their reserves