Type 95 Assault Rifle II
- Thread starter Chengdu J-10
- Start date
Rising China
Junior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
These three videos from CCTV will let you know how reliable and accurate QBZ 95 assault rifles are and how effective the 5.8mm calibre is.
:china::china::china:
These three videos from CCTV will let you know how reliable and accurate QBZ 95 assault rifles are and how effective the 5.8mm calibre is.
:china::china::china:
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
I had saved the video a long time ago yet i've never found time to go through them until now. I'd have to say, i am abit disapointed. It is aimed at the general public to bring about awarenese rather than having any useful bit of information. 95 is a good start, but a replacement should(maybe already) be on the drawing table, other than the 03.
I had saved the video a long time ago yet i've never found time to go through them until now. I'd have to say, i am abit disapointed. It is aimed at the general public to bring about awarenese rather than having any useful bit of information. 95 is a good start, but a replacement should(maybe already) be on the drawing table, other than the 03.
TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
It's been In service all of what 13 years? still new I can think of a half dozen things too change on the Rifle before even trying to replace it. Cost wise it's better too refit and Rebuild before scrapping.
First replace the charging handle with a side mounted unit and maybe move it foreword too. ( like the Tavor) then either Scrap the carry handle for a optics rail, or Replace it with a G36 style sight system in either case a Reflex optic should then be standardized ( these should lower the Sight line placing the user in a more covered firing position )
Second Install A Rail Accessory system on the 3 and 9 o'clock positions with laser sight and flash light options.
third a Kevlar brass deflector.
fourth a redesigned and Repositioned Safety selector
Fifth reconfigure the Under barrel Grenade launcher so that opening includes the option of Tilting to either side too allow longer shells
Sixth build on said UGL to include a digital fire control system.
It's been In service all of what 13 years? still new I can think of a half dozen things too change on the Rifle before even trying to replace it. Cost wise it's better too refit and Rebuild before scrapping.
First replace the charging handle with a side mounted unit and maybe move it foreword too. ( like the Tavor) then either Scrap the carry handle for a optics rail, or Replace it with a G36 style sight system in either case a Reflex optic should then be standardized ( these should lower the Sight line placing the user in a more covered firing position )
Second Install A Rail Accessory system on the 3 and 9 o'clock positions with laser sight and flash light options.
third a Kevlar brass deflector.
fourth a redesigned and Repositioned Safety selector
Fifth reconfigure the Under barrel Grenade launcher so that opening includes the option of Tilting to either side too allow longer shells
Sixth build on said UGL to include a digital fire control system.
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
And about laser or flashlight, the current Chinese equipped T-95 have laser mounted ports above the barrel, and also have ports on the foward grip for flashlights already. The only modifications I would do is the replace the saftey switch to H&K Submachine gun selector switch style. And have the capability of partial disassembly to switch from Right to Left. To train soldiers the basics of operating on the left.
having the sights ontop of the carrying handle doesnt expose the shooters head anymore then if the operator were using optics mounted on a rail. The T-95 and M-16 have simular heights for its rear peep sights. The chambering of the round of the T-95 and Tavour is different, positioning the charging handful would be more harder then it is now. Standard mounted optics is costly since Israel has only couple tens of thousand of soldiers to equip compared to million of soldiers for the Chinese.
And about laser or flashlight, the current Chinese equipped T-95 have laser mounted ports above the barrel, and also have ports on the foward grip for flashlights already. The only modifications I would do is the replace the saftey switch to H&K Submachine gun selector switch style. And have the capability of partial disassembly to switch from Right to Left. To train soldiers the basics of operating on the left.
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
The Type 95 does need to replace the handle with a rail if it's going to be efficiently used by SpecOps in the future, and that will mean a relocated charger. They can put a new handle on the rail instead, like the M16A3s and A4s.
I don't know if there is a side rail system of any sort on the Type 95, but if they are going to give some on 3 and 9 o'clock, it needs to be full length, as the forearm of the 95 is short, so having a half length rail is going to feel weird, if you know what I mean, especially in combat.
On the same note, redesign that limping front handle! The only thing I can describe it as are scandals from February......Seriously, the left hand is no smaller than the right hand!
Oh yea, definitely relocate that fire selector.
I wouldn't go for a eject-selectable 95 though. It'll cost too much to be the same gun and if improperly designed, it can chew up your face when the bolt goes forward. And I wouldn't rely on little part that can get lost for that. I'd rather just go for the Singaporean solution and maybe try to in some way move the ejection port forward.
The Type 95 does need to replace the handle with a rail if it's going to be efficiently used by SpecOps in the future, and that will mean a relocated charger. They can put a new handle on the rail instead, like the M16A3s and A4s.
I don't know if there is a side rail system of any sort on the Type 95, but if they are going to give some on 3 and 9 o'clock, it needs to be full length, as the forearm of the 95 is short, so having a half length rail is going to feel weird, if you know what I mean, especially in combat.
On the same note, redesign that limping front handle! The only thing I can describe it as are scandals from February......Seriously, the left hand is no smaller than the right hand!
Oh yea, definitely relocate that fire selector.
I wouldn't go for a eject-selectable 95 though. It'll cost too much to be the same gun and if improperly designed, it can chew up your face when the bolt goes forward. And I wouldn't rely on little part that can get lost for that. I'd rather just go for the Singaporean solution and maybe try to in some way move the ejection port forward.
TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
The Cost of Optical Sights is Going lower and lower Every year as new sights come on line. Meaning that the possibly of a Mass production, mass Issue Optics will increase as time goes by. the M16 and M4 are shedding there high mounted peep sights in favor of low mounted flip ups and Optics and in some cases when the M16's front sight post is dropped even lower sights. The M16, G36, SA80, Aug and Fa-Mas all started with high mounted handle sights now most have either lost them or Augmented via the introduction of veriants them. But anouther thought could be to Engineer the Carry handle with a red dot like the G36. this would still mean changing the carging handle and require creating a opening in the front of the carry handle and scraping the front sight post too peep through In actuality i think this would be the best.
then placing the Charger about in the same place the Carry handle starts, and moving it form a vertical too a horizontal would allow for easer grab and use and would be a must for a rail as using an M16 style would not work. a partial Rail is an option using the current forearm high mounted just behind the front sight post. as placing the Light and or Lasers would imped Low mounted optics.
My note on left too Right conversion moving the Ejection foreword and adding a brass defector should allow more "Wrong handed uses"
The Cost of Optical Sights is Going lower and lower Every year as new sights come on line. Meaning that the possibly of a Mass production, mass Issue Optics will increase as time goes by. the M16 and M4 are shedding there high mounted peep sights in favor of low mounted flip ups and Optics and in some cases when the M16's front sight post is dropped even lower sights. The M16, G36, SA80, Aug and Fa-Mas all started with high mounted handle sights now most have either lost them or Augmented via the introduction of veriants them. But anouther thought could be to Engineer the Carry handle with a red dot like the G36. this would still mean changing the carging handle and require creating a opening in the front of the carry handle and scraping the front sight post too peep through In actuality i think this would be the best.
then placing the Charger about in the same place the Carry handle starts, and moving it form a vertical too a horizontal would allow for easer grab and use and would be a must for a rail as using an M16 style would not work. a partial Rail is an option using the current forearm high mounted just behind the front sight post. as placing the Light and or Lasers would imped Low mounted optics.
My note on left too Right conversion moving the Ejection foreword and adding a brass defector should allow more "Wrong handed uses"
Rising China
Junior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
According to the article below, the Kriss submachine gun is quite accurate because the recoil energy is designed to be pushing downwards rather straight back to the shooter. So, which system is the better - the conventional one where the energy goes straight back to the shooter or the Kriss type? Some people who have already tested Kriss before said that the gun is not as good as they claim.
TDI Kriss Super V™ submachine gun (USA)
Caliber .45 ACP
Weight, empty 2,18 kg prototype
1,8 - 2,0 kg target for production gun
Length (stock folded / opened) 406 / 635 mm
Barrel length 140 mm
Rate of fire 800 to 1100 rounds per minute
Magazine capacity 13 rounds (28 round magazine is being developed)
Effective range 100 meters
Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is an interesting experimental weapon which is currently (spring 2007) under advanced stages of development. The name Kriss comes from Indonesian sword or large knife with flame-like blade. This weapon is intended to provide operators with improved control over accuracy and bullet dispersion, in both semi-automatic and full automatic modes, while firing hard-hitting .45 ACP ammunition. The overall design also permits the Kriss to be fired single-handedly when required by tactical situations and with adequate accuracy. To achieve those goals, Kriss Super V™ submachine gun employs three basic solutions. First is to place the axis of the recoil force in line with the firing hand, thus minimizing the muzzle climbing. Such system was previously employed in Olympic-class small-bore pistol developed in Russia and was subsequently banned from international ISU competitions because of extremely high accuracy, which made completion "unfair". The second solution is probably more novel, as it uses a laterally moving weight, attached to the breechblock (bolt), to divert recoil forces to the bottom direction. The third solution is actually a part of the second system, and it employs a variable-angle track in the weight (#510 on diagram above), which puts a breechblock at a mechanical disadvantage during earlier stages of recoil, thus slowing down the movement of the bolt while pressure in the barrel is still high. As a result of these measures, Kriss Super V™ submachine gun has significantly less muzzle climb when compared to most modern submachine guns. This results in better accuracy and better grouping of hits on target, providing operators with greater lethality during short-range and short-time encounters.
According to the manufacturer, the Transformational Defense Industries, Inc. (TDI), a wholly-owned US subsidiary of the Gamma Industries (Switzerland), the Super V™ system also can be used for submachine guns in other calibers (i.e. 9mm Luger and .40SW). TDI is also developing civilian-legal semiautomatic carbines with 16" (405 mm) barrels. To date (April 2007) TDI has manufactured four prototypes of the Kriss Super V™ submachine guns, which displayed very promising results during numerous live-fire tests. The development of selective-fired version of Kriss Super V™ weapon is conducted in cooperation with US Army ARDEC and several undisclosed industry partners.
Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is delayed blowback operated, selectively fired submachine gun. It fires from closed bolt for enhanced first-shot accuracy. Fire control group is situated above the barrel. Very light bolt is connected to the vertically sliding weight, which is located within a polymer housing in front of the pistol grip. In one of tested configurations additional Enidine hydraulic buffer assembly is employed to further decrease rate of fire by about 200 rpm and to lower weight of the moving parts. Folding cocking handle is located on the left side of the gun, and does not move when gun is fired. Firing controls include ambidextrous fire mode selector switch, located about the middle of the upper receiver / trigger mechanism housing, which provides full auto fire, 2-round bursts and semi-automatic fie, and a separate ambidextrous manual safety switch, which is conveniently located just above the pistol grip. Feed is from 13-round Glock Model 21 magazines, but a larger capacity, 28-round magazine is currently in development. Magazine is inserted into a housing, located in front of the pistol grip. Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is fitted with two Picatinny type rails, one above the receiver and another below the barrel, and two additional rails can be installed on either side of the lower receiver, providing ample mounting space for all necessary accessories, such as laser-aiming modules or tactical flashlights. The upper rail can accept a variety of sighting devices, such as open or red-dot sights; lower rail is usually fitted with vertical foregrip. On latest prototype, the front of the upper receiver / trigger housing above the barrel is hollow and shaped as to accept tactical flashlight. A side-folding polymer buttstock is provided for more accurate shooting.
Special thanks to Tim Lindsay of Transformational Defense Industries, Inc. (TDI) for information and images.
--
According to the article below, the Kriss submachine gun is quite accurate because the recoil energy is designed to be pushing downwards rather straight back to the shooter. So, which system is the better - the conventional one where the energy goes straight back to the shooter or the Kriss type? Some people who have already tested Kriss before said that the gun is not as good as they claim.
TDI Kriss Super V™ submachine gun (USA)
Caliber .45 ACP
Weight, empty 2,18 kg prototype
1,8 - 2,0 kg target for production gun
Length (stock folded / opened) 406 / 635 mm
Barrel length 140 mm
Rate of fire 800 to 1100 rounds per minute
Magazine capacity 13 rounds (28 round magazine is being developed)
Effective range 100 meters
Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is an interesting experimental weapon which is currently (spring 2007) under advanced stages of development. The name Kriss comes from Indonesian sword or large knife with flame-like blade. This weapon is intended to provide operators with improved control over accuracy and bullet dispersion, in both semi-automatic and full automatic modes, while firing hard-hitting .45 ACP ammunition. The overall design also permits the Kriss to be fired single-handedly when required by tactical situations and with adequate accuracy. To achieve those goals, Kriss Super V™ submachine gun employs three basic solutions. First is to place the axis of the recoil force in line with the firing hand, thus minimizing the muzzle climbing. Such system was previously employed in Olympic-class small-bore pistol developed in Russia and was subsequently banned from international ISU competitions because of extremely high accuracy, which made completion "unfair". The second solution is probably more novel, as it uses a laterally moving weight, attached to the breechblock (bolt), to divert recoil forces to the bottom direction. The third solution is actually a part of the second system, and it employs a variable-angle track in the weight (#510 on diagram above), which puts a breechblock at a mechanical disadvantage during earlier stages of recoil, thus slowing down the movement of the bolt while pressure in the barrel is still high. As a result of these measures, Kriss Super V™ submachine gun has significantly less muzzle climb when compared to most modern submachine guns. This results in better accuracy and better grouping of hits on target, providing operators with greater lethality during short-range and short-time encounters.
According to the manufacturer, the Transformational Defense Industries, Inc. (TDI), a wholly-owned US subsidiary of the Gamma Industries (Switzerland), the Super V™ system also can be used for submachine guns in other calibers (i.e. 9mm Luger and .40SW). TDI is also developing civilian-legal semiautomatic carbines with 16" (405 mm) barrels. To date (April 2007) TDI has manufactured four prototypes of the Kriss Super V™ submachine guns, which displayed very promising results during numerous live-fire tests. The development of selective-fired version of Kriss Super V™ weapon is conducted in cooperation with US Army ARDEC and several undisclosed industry partners.
Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is delayed blowback operated, selectively fired submachine gun. It fires from closed bolt for enhanced first-shot accuracy. Fire control group is situated above the barrel. Very light bolt is connected to the vertically sliding weight, which is located within a polymer housing in front of the pistol grip. In one of tested configurations additional Enidine hydraulic buffer assembly is employed to further decrease rate of fire by about 200 rpm and to lower weight of the moving parts. Folding cocking handle is located on the left side of the gun, and does not move when gun is fired. Firing controls include ambidextrous fire mode selector switch, located about the middle of the upper receiver / trigger mechanism housing, which provides full auto fire, 2-round bursts and semi-automatic fie, and a separate ambidextrous manual safety switch, which is conveniently located just above the pistol grip. Feed is from 13-round Glock Model 21 magazines, but a larger capacity, 28-round magazine is currently in development. Magazine is inserted into a housing, located in front of the pistol grip. Kriss Super V™ submachine gun is fitted with two Picatinny type rails, one above the receiver and another below the barrel, and two additional rails can be installed on either side of the lower receiver, providing ample mounting space for all necessary accessories, such as laser-aiming modules or tactical flashlights. The upper rail can accept a variety of sighting devices, such as open or red-dot sights; lower rail is usually fitted with vertical foregrip. On latest prototype, the front of the upper receiver / trigger housing above the barrel is hollow and shaped as to accept tactical flashlight. A side-folding polymer buttstock is provided for more accurate shooting.
Special thanks to Tim Lindsay of Transformational Defense Industries, Inc. (TDI) for information and images.
--
sidewinder01
Junior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
I think they definitely need a handle for both the specops and normal infantry. I fired type-95 in person when in the summer, I dont know about you guys, but if you are a big bigger and taller than a average chinese soldier; it is really hard to aim and shoot at a long distance target with 95, its very uncomfortable and it just feel weird.... plus even the spec ops uses 03 now. eject-selectable is definitely out of the picture atm... not even all the GAs have type-95 for all of their infantry... no $$$
I think they definitely need a handle for both the specops and normal infantry. I fired type-95 in person when in the summer, I dont know about you guys, but if you are a big bigger and taller than a average chinese soldier; it is really hard to aim and shoot at a long distance target with 95, its very uncomfortable and it just feel weird.... plus even the spec ops uses 03 now. eject-selectable is definitely out of the picture atm... not even all the GAs have type-95 for all of their infantry... no $$$
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
well basically from what you described a rifle version of the QBU88 DMS would cover those, a short rail for optics with flip up front post and rear sight, with side realoading.
Last edited: