Re: Type 95 assault rifle
Bayoneting is not practical on the modern battlefield, so armies seem to be moving away from that concept by designing bullpups. Even units specializing in close quarter battles bring pistols instead of fixing bayonets on their rifles. Otherwise, the modern bayonets could well be used as combat knives instead, held in the hand instead of secured on a rifle.
It seems that the Type 03 will not enter service afterall. You never see that weapon on official PLA pictures by the government and on PLA daily, and it's five years since. Earlier pictures might just indicate experimental fieldings. Type 95 is going to be the standard infantry weapon for the next 20 years. This is also well demonstrated by the many pictures glorifying the Chinese soldier carrying the Type 95, so a personality has already developed, much like the AK-47 or M16.
Bayoneting is not practical on the modern battlefield, so armies seem to be moving away from that concept by designing bullpups. Even units specializing in close quarter battles bring pistols instead of fixing bayonets on their rifles. Otherwise, the modern bayonets could well be used as combat knives instead, held in the hand instead of secured on a rifle.
It seems that the Type 03 will not enter service afterall. You never see that weapon on official PLA pictures by the government and on PLA daily, and it's five years since. Earlier pictures might just indicate experimental fieldings. Type 95 is going to be the standard infantry weapon for the next 20 years. This is also well demonstrated by the many pictures glorifying the Chinese soldier carrying the Type 95, so a personality has already developed, much like the AK-47 or M16.
Last edited: