Putting PAF above RuAF is quite the claim.
PAF have 4 tankers, all sold by Russia, there are no alternative parts suppliers since Ukraine War.
RuAF has 20 tankers, all domestic.
RuAF has 1200 fighters, all long ranged, all domestic, all 4th gen or better.
PAF has 500, all short ranged, out of which 220 are obsolete 3rd gen (Mirage 3, Mirage 5, J-7).
RuAF has 120 bombers with 2000-5000 km range cruise missiles and 200 KT yield if nuclear equipped (Kh-55, Kh-101).
PAF has 0 bombers, 1 air launched cruise missile with 600 km range (Ra'ad 2) and only 5 KT yield if nuclear equipped.
RuAF can strike Pakistani airbases, PAF can't strike Russian airbases. RuAF has the range to choose where the fight occurs, PAF doesn't.
Russia has continuously won wars throughout its history. It beat the shit out of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. It crushed the Hungarian and Czechoslovakian uprisings. It lost Afghanistan but did so with a literal 1:100 kill ratio only counting Soviets, 1:50 counting Afghan collaborators. For comparison, this is better than US during Vietnam - 1:40 counting US forces, 1:1 counting South Vietnam collaborators.
PK was humiliated by , one of their largest urban centers, then it lost half its population and territory in 1971. BTW, in . Pakistan still can't crush the Balochistan uprising or the Pakistani Taliban.
IN doesn't even take PK seriously anymore.
Let's compare PK vs. NK even. NK and PK have comparable GDP per capita, but , , . NK has ICBMs with proven 250 kT max yield, PK doesn't even have IRBMs and only has proven 40 kT max yield.
Don't be angry at me. All I said is objective facts and history.
