Re: PLAN submarines Thread II
not disagreeing with you here that China doesn't need lada imo. But at the end of the day, I'm not sitting in the negotiation room. PLAN is.
And if they do for whatever reason get it, the best argument you can make regarding lada is that it would be a generational improvement over the current Chinese submarine used in the littoral role. In the case of Sov, I did not see any reason for them to purchase it back then either as I put in my blog entry, but they ended up purchasing it.
Yes, this argument is pointless because i dont think that this people exist, or if they ever existed, are no longer in position of power, because the domestic industry has shown it can do it.
if china can go to the hassle of developing a totally new submarine just for SLBM tests, it surely can develop a combat submarine using that tech. And why would china want a littoral submarine ?? the west pacific is not the baltic sea nor the black sea. There is a reason why japan´s submarines are the largest SSK´s in the world. Ships have to cover great distances. And china has a big coast. China has bought the su-30 and sov destroyer because in the past they had urgent need for tech/solutions, and couldnt wait for domestic solutions. They were needed at the time. Today, china doesnt need lada.
not disagreeing with you here that China doesn't need lada imo. But at the end of the day, I'm not sitting in the negotiation room. PLAN is.
And if they do for whatever reason get it, the best argument you can make regarding lada is that it would be a generational improvement over the current Chinese submarine used in the littoral role. In the case of Sov, I did not see any reason for them to purchase it back then either as I put in my blog entry, but they ended up purchasing it.