PLAN Type 035/039/091/092 Submarine Thread

D

delft

Brigadier
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Hyperwarp said:
PRC is NOT a member of the MTCR. PRC has said it'll abide by some of the guidelines. It seems PRC wanted to join but MTCR members had not offered it. Plus, neither India nor Pakistan are members.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


But don't forget the US sold Tomahawks to the UK in 1995, as well as Trident D5 SLBM before that. MTCR more of a partnership than a signed treaties like NPT, CTBT etc.
Click to expand...
I understood the Tridents were not sold to the UK but leased.
 
bd popeye

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Improved Yuan Class(039B) which was speculated to feature with new sonar and weapon system entered PLAN service. Courtsey of ASAT at mp.net

I'm not responsible for the drawings on the conning tower!

1-1860.jpg


BsOdg.jpg

eS7kZ.jpg

XGOwl.jpg
 
R

Red___Sword

Junior Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

no_name said:
LMAO it says no CD and Pinkov.
Click to expand...

"... is allowed."... - NO CD AND pinkov IS ALLOWED (to use this pic)

Seriously, any self-claim-creditable news agency / columnists who quotes anything pinkov claims, should have their eyes surgicaled. (which unfortunately, happens a lot) - you (the abovementioned news agencies) didn't saw which toilet pinkov's credit sits?
 
R

Red___Sword

Junior Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

no_name said:
It says Pinkov jin yon, which means not allowed to use.
Click to expand...

Right. I said No ... is allowed...

I just pointing out your #1116 post reads odd, if you don't have the "... is allowed" part.

Many big shrimps got similar watermarks on their pics, rival forums most of times.
 
K

kroko

Senior Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

bd popeye said:
Improved Yuan Class(039B) which was speculated to feature with new sonar and weapon system entered PLAN service. Courtsey of ASAT at mp.net
Click to expand...

Has anyone heard any confirmation that this is a new SSK instead of a new SLBM test platform (SSB) ? this thing has a big tower for such a small hull
 
N

no_name

Colonel
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

The tower has at least one side door near the base connection with the main hull, is that any other sub that have this config? Is it designed to be water tight? I'm wondering if they even decided it's ok to have portions of the tower not water tight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top