Apart from China and USA, is there another country with a working prototype or doing advance researching into EMALS catapult technology today?I am not too sure whether having operating steam catapult is a "must" before operating EMAL?
Apart from China and USA, is there another country with a working prototype or doing advance researching into EMALS catapult technology today?I am not too sure whether having operating steam catapult is a "must" before operating EMAL?
Surely when PLAN Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, the head of the team that has won a top national award for the electromagnetic catapult, told Hong Kong Media in an interview last year 2015 that China does not lag behind the US in the development of electromagnetic catapult, it must have meant something.
Surely when PLAN Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, the head of the team that has won a top national award for the electromagnetic catapult, told Hong Kong Media in an interview last year 2015 that China does not lag behind the US in the development of electromagnetic catapult, it must have meant something.
Unless our layman detractors in here are claiming that they knows EMAL technology better than him.
Ma also stated that US only began its emal catapult in 2009 while China had already has a full working prototype for testing back in 2011.
He believes that China’s own R&D electromagnetic catapult is not only as good as the US and is more advanced in some areas.
There is only one country on earth, that manufactures new steam catapults. And there are possibly two countrys on earth able to manufacture EMALS in the future.Apart from China and USA, is there another country with a working prototype or doing advance researching into EMALS catapult technology today?
Regardless of a person's title or achievements, sometimes the avenue and environment is much more meaningful and accurate when assessing the validity of claims.
I would rather hear what Admr. Ma's opinion on EMALs is when he is talking to PLAN insiders or the CCP government in private. That I would take it to the bank and not necessarily what he says to HK Media in a public forum.
Also the timeline is very vague. Did he actually utter those words or were they scribed later by media journalists?
Navy expert: China's electromagnetic launch technology no inferior to America
(Source: ) 2015-03-10
BEIJING, March 10 (ChinaMil) -- Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, power and electrical engineering specialist of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLAN), said recently that China's catapult-assisted take-off technology for carrier-borne aircraft has no problem at all, and is even no inferior to that of America.
The public is very concerned about whether the first truly China-made aircraft carrier will adopt the ski-jump take-off technology of the "Liaoning" aircraft-carrier, or directly use the current top electromagnetic catapult-assisted take-off technology. It's known to all that once breakthroughs are made in the catapult-assisted take-off technology, the combat radius and bomb load of the carrier-borne aircraft will be greatly increased.
Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, inventor of China's electromagnetic catapult and specialist in electrical engineering, pointed out that China's catapult-assisted take-off technology for the carrier-borne aircraft has no problem at all and has been proved successful in various repeated tests. He emphasized that China's catapult-assisted take-off technology in hand is no inferior to that of America, and is even more advanced.
Ma Weiming has won the First Prize of National Scientific and Technological Progress Award and First Prize of the Military Scientific and Technological Progress Award for a number of times. He is called a "national-treasure-class" technical rear admiral.
After the reporter questioned closely about whether the China-made aircraft carrier will use the electromagnetic catapult, Ma Weiming joked, "I am just a worker."
Pointing to the one star on his uniform, he said he is just a technical rear admiral and is only responsible for developing useable technologies, and that only high-ranking military officials can decide which kind of technical plan is adopted.
Editor:Yao Jianing
Well, you can either believe that what he says is true and end the discussion right there, or you can examine the actual facts available.
And the facts are that the US has been launching full sized aircraft since 2010 with an EMALS system, with photos to show.
How many comparable launches by the Chinese EMALS system?
Looking at the progress shown in the pictures and knowing that they still have a lot of hull work, the flight deck, the island, and knowing the amount of work that has to be done internally to bring everything together...
What you says is quite valid if Rear Admiral Ma is a politician lik e the US POTUS or US Sec. of State Hilliary Clintons but he is not.Regardless of a person's title or achievements, sometimes the avenue and environment is much more meaningful and accurate when assessing the validity of claims.
I would rather hear what Admr. Ma's opinion on EMALs is when he is talking to PLAN insiders or the CCP government in private. That I would take it to the bank and not necessarily what he says to HK Media in a public forum.