In response to both, it is very likely that the actual 001A won't match the renderings too closely.
Just because state media report something or posts a certain picture or rendering does not make all the details of it true -- after all, state media are run by people like any other, and some of the time when they write about certain fresh and new PLA developments they may not be aware of certain details or nuances.
In this case, the inclusion of a few CGI renderings are there probably because they were available online and were thought to be a decent artist's illustration of what the real thing might look like... and not any sort of deliberate "leak" to tell us what 001A will exactly look like down to certain details.
So the renderings that they posted in the video are basically useless, and I strongly caution against reading too much into them, if at all.
The best way to think about state media reporting on PLA matters is that often, certain new details or developments or exercises which are entirely legitimate and exclusive are often posted by them. But at the same time, that does not mean every single news story and every single clip they post will be reflective of a certain development or what not -- sometimes they might just use a random clip or a random rendering because it is convenient. Back in the late 2000s I remember a CCTV clip about the air force and they included a clip from top gun where a fighter was shot down, and it was widely perceived as some sort of misinformation to try and portray a missile test as successful -- when in reality, the crew and reporter working on that particular story probably were either lazy or unable to get the footage of the actual event and thought it would be acceptable to stitch together a movie clip as a representative fill in.
Once we understand that fundamental logic, then it makes interpreting state media segments on PLA matters to be a much easier task.