PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme...(Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

cloyce

Junior Member
What China need is her problem saying only what is known and what they could use eventualy for build a CATOBAR possible nuclear now with China we have need a crystal ball ! ...

With any other country we know yet since long time majority of infos about this new CV with essential specifications, we have yet some infos enough precise, an idea for the future Russian CVN build for 15 years minimum...
I dont get your point. Especially the first part. Please write in a more understandable english.​
 

weig2000

Captain
Can China build two carriers at once? Do they need to?

The answer to both is yes, but will they?

Ok 2016 just got really really interesting !!!

001A and 002 are built by two different shipyards, and by two different teams (DL & JNCX). There is no conflict for resources. The planning for 002 and 001A were about at the same time, according to Chinese sources, which makes sense to me. The steam catapult is ready and no other technology barriers stand in the way of building 002.

In all likelihood, the construction of 001A and 002 are three years apart. So 002 may start to be built next year and will be commissioned by 2022.

Building a carrier takes a long time. For each of the classes 001, 002 and 003, it'll take roughly ten years from planning, design, hull-construction, launch, fitting, sea trial to commission. China will not build them in strict sequential order and their build schedule will be staggered.

It is because of this long build cycles that I believe they will have a secondary build branch 001A, 002A, and 003A that will be of the same corresponding class of the primary build branch 001-> 002 -> 003, but will incorporate incremental learning and technology developments from the construction/operations of previous carriers. This secondary build branch will also speed up the formation of China's carrier forces and leverage the economy of scales in construction and training. Ten years is a long time; already we're seeing a lot of people second-guessing the decision to build 001A instead of go straight to 002. And that decision were made around 2011-2012 when China was less confident about its carrier-building skills and steam catapult were mature enough.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Ten years is a long time; already we're seeing a lot of people second-guessing the decision to build 001A instead of go straight to 002. And that decision were made around 2011-2012 when China was less confident about its carrier-building skills and steam catapult were mature enough.
The decision highlights the risk averse nature of China's high command and its unwillingness to take even moderate risks on new (to China) technology.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Those pictures DO NOT show the 002...particularly the last one. That is a picture of a mockup/demonstrator build from years ago that had no bearing on, or part in the actuall 002.

Please, ensure that you post things that are accurate...that you KNOW are accurate, or post them first in the Ask Anything Thread and get people to respond to them so you know what they are.

But do not make assertions like this, posting such a thing as if though it is a part of 002 when it is not.

Icloo, the same goes for you.

Thanks.

I'm not sure if I missed something, but he did quite clearly say the module was the demo module: "IMO, watch out for Dry Dock No.4 in JNCX where previously the aircraft carrier demo model was spotted."

He did not claim the demo module to be the actual module, unless that occurred after an edit (but even then, his edit seemed to occur some yen minutes before your reply, which also happens to quote the very part where he mentions the demo module).

The things he is claiming is from fzgfzy, a mod who is considered a very respected insider on Chinese navy developments. Fzgfzy seems to be claiming the cutting of first steel for 002 has begun, and if he is saying it then I am inclined to believe him due to his reputation and past predictions: fyi he was also the same guy making the predictions and releases earlier this year for 001A, months before any of us could positively ID the ship.
 
Last edited:

bruceb1959

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm not sure if I missed something, but he did quite clearly say the module was the demo module: "IMO, watch out for Dry Dock No.4 in JNCX where previously the aircraft carrier demo model was spotted."

He did not claim the demo module to be the actual module, unless that occurred after an edit (but even then, his edit seemed to occur some yen minutes before your reply, which also happens to quote the very part where he mentions the demo module).

The things he is claiming is from fzgfzy, a mod who is considered a very respected insider on Chinese navy developments. Fzgfzy seems to be claiming the cutting of first steel for 002 has begun, and if he is saying it then I am inclined to believe him due to his reputation and past predictions: fyi he was also the same guy making the predictions and releases earlier this year for 001A, months before any of us could positively ID the ship.


My view was the same, thought I cannot read/speak Chinese, and so had no understanding of the Chines bulletin, re the cutting of steel. I had assumed the arrival of the new crane to signify a new period of building/different type of vessel. Likewise re the demo module - I felt that he mead it clear it was just that. A demonstration piece.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
My view was the same, thought I cannot .read/speak Chinese, and so had no understanding of the Chines bulletin, re the cutting of steel. I had assumed the arrival of the new crane to signify a new period of building/different type of vessel. Likewise re the demo module - I felt that he mead it clear it was just that. A demonstration piece.

Clarification, steel cutting was mentioned on another forum as something to begin this year
 

weig2000

Captain
Ten years is a long time; already we're seeing a lot of people second-guessing the decision to build 001A instead of go straight to 002. And that decision were made around 2011-2012 when China was less confident about its carrier-building skills and steam catapult were mature enough.

The decision highlights the risk averse nature of China's high command and its unwillingness to take even moderate risks on new (to China) technology.

Sorry, I meant to say "... and steam catapult _weren't_ mature enough."

In any case, the decision to build a 001A instead of going straight to 002 is not a bad one, even in hindsight. 001A built by DL did not hinder the construction schedule of 002 built by JNCX. All it means its that the PLAN will have an extra STOBAR carrier to train ahead of the availability of 002, and it costs some budget which is much less of a concern than others.

As it stands now, the bottleneck to operationalize PLAN's carrier is not even the quantity of J-15, which is in shortage and SAC can't produce them fast enough, it's the training of the flight pilots. So having an extra STOBAR earlier is actually a good thing.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member


No, the fault was mine -- by "clarification" I was meaning to clarify my original reply #5254 where what I wrote was misleading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top