PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme...(Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Thanks for the detail and clarification.

I am sure we lose some in the translation. It would be interesting to know further details, but at least we are getting something more now.

I am copying your post to the J-15 thread as well.

Actually, from the Chinese article, it didn't even specify that they two who died were pilots. Just comrades. So that could apply to anyone involved from designers, engineers right through to pilots and ship crew.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Deino posted a nice summary of what actually happened over in the J-15 thread.

It's kind of sad/amusing how quickly this news was jumped upon without seeking further confirmation. But anyone who's read english translations of chinese articles, even from official "government" sources, should know to take it well salted.


In fact, I'd say half of the time official english written state media reports on PLA happenings are useless.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
But are there any recent news lately ??? :confused:

Nope...we've seen very little from CV-16 in the last year or so.

Actually since the first arrested landings and ski ramp launches two years ago not much. I was very excited when the first photos and videos were released. I even commented on how professional the flight deck crew appeared. I was impressed!

We still have not seen any sort of flight deck drills. Even an aircraft being fueled with a rigid (Charged) hose. I'm not sure bet the most aircraft we've seen on deck is three. And yes I know the J-15 is still in it's infant stage.

As I stated some time ago the PLAN CV program seems to be stagnated. Why is that? I sure don't know.
 

Franklin

Captain
Nope...we've seen very little from CV-16 in the last year or so.

Actually since the first arrested landings and ski ramp launches two years ago not much. I was very excited when the first photos and videos were released. I even commented on how professional the flight deck crew appeared. I was impressed!

We still have not seen any sort of flight deck drills. Even an aircraft being fueled with a rigid (Charged) hose. I'm not sure bet the most aircraft we've seen on deck is three. And yes I know the J-15 is still in it's infant stage.

As I stated some time ago the PLAN CV program seems to be stagnated. Why is that? I sure don't know.

The reason why the PLAN carrier program seems to be "stagnant" for the moment is because they don't have the planes. There are only 9 production J-15's now and more is to come. But as to when we will see the first air wing embark on the Liaoning is an open question. Most likely some time next year. But the PLAN will remain cautious about this and they won't embark the air wing unless they are absolutely certain that both man and machine are ready.

What we have here is a rare moment in carrier history that an nation is not only trying to build a carrier air wing and all the associated hardware but also the entire industry behind it from virtually nothing. So China at this moment is not only building a carrier air wing but they are building an entire industry. And that takes time. The Indians bought their planes from the Russians so they can start embarking their carrier air wing almost right away. China on the other hand is either unable or unwilling to buy foreign planes for its first aircraft carrier and therefor have to wait for years before they can embark their carrier air wing.

The only other example in the recent history that is comparable to the Liaoning now is the Russian Admiral Kuznetsov in the 1990's. The ship was ready and was commissioned but neither the SU-33 nor the MiG-29K was ready for production and the ship had to sail for many years without an air wing. The Admiral Kuznetsov was commissioned in 1990 but didn't get its full air wing untill 1995.
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
New details have emerged on the aircraft lineup for the new carrier Liaoning, which analysts say is a “plausible” mix of foreign-designed fighter jets and various helicopters, yet limited due to its lack of other necessary aircraft.

According to the Aug. 28 edition of the Chinese-language Shanghai Morning Post, the carrier will house 36 aircraft, including:

■ 24 Shenyang J-15 Flying Shark fighters.

■ 6 Changhe Z-18F anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopters.

■ 4 Changhe Z-18J airborne early warning helicopters.

■ 2 Harbin Z-9C rescue helicopters.

The article was based on quotes from Cao Dongwei, senior colonel and researcher at the People’s Liberation Army Naval Research Institute. The Liaoning is a refurbished Soviet-era Varyag aircraft carrier procured in 1998 by China and commissioned in 2012.

“The overall lineup certainly looks plausible, as the mix of helicopters and fighters is similar to how the Russians outfit their example of this carrier,” said Roger Cliff, senior fellow with the Asia Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council. “The striking thing about this carrier and aircraft lineup is that every single item is based on a foreign system. The Liaoning is a Russian-built ship fitted out with Chinese systems. The helicopters are based on Eurocopter designs. And the J-15 fighters are based on the Russian Su-33 design.”

China’s first carrier air wing reflects a balance between combat and support aircraft seen in the Liaoning’s Russian counterpart, said Richard Fisher, a senior fellow with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

“The Soviets intended their carrier to provide a defensive extension for their pro-nuclear ballistic missile submarine ‘anti-access’ missile forces carried by their nuclear submarines, large surface combatants and land-based strike bombers. The Liaoning can perform that mission for the Chinese Navy as well as form the centerpiece for a carrier battle group that could overwhelm most Asian navies, but would still require extensive land-based support to oppose a US Navy carrier battle group.”

According to Chinese defense industry brochures acquired at air shows around Asia, the Z-9 and Z-18 helicopters have numerous configurations for both civilian and military use in China.

The Z-9 configuration is based on the Eurocopter SA365/AS365 Dauphin 2 and built by the Harbin Aviation Industry Group. According to Harbin brochures, the “C” search variant can be equipped with an electronic flight instrument system and ZLC-1 surface search radar. Harbin also makes the “EC” ASW variant equipped with a dipping sonar, torpedo and surface search radar. Two Arriel 2C turbo-shaft engines power both. The WZ8D engine might also power some of these aircraft, which is a copy of the Arriel 2B1A turboshaft engine. The WZ8 powers the Z-11W light attack helicopter.

Liaoning’s other rotary airframe, the Z-18, is built by the Changhe Aircraft Industries Corp. and comes in only the “F” and “J” military series. The Z-18 and Avicopter’s AC313 civilian variant are based on the Changhe Z-8. The Z-8, in turn, is a copy of the Aerospatiale SA-321 Super Frelon. It is a medium tri-turbine helicopter powered by a Pratt & Whitney PT6B-67A engine for its civilian variant and possibly an improved variant of the WZ6 engine based on an older WZ6 used in the Z-8.

On Aug. 12, the Chinese-language Qianjiang Evening News reported the Z-18F ASW variant had four eight-tube sonobuoy launchers, along with four Yu-7K anti-submarine torpedoes or four YJ-91 (Kh-31P) anti-ship cruise missiles. The Z-18F would also be assigned to the new Type 071 Yuzhao-class amphibious transport docks, which are capable of storing four Z-18 or Z-8 helicopters in the hangar.

“I find it implausible that the Z-18 could carry four YJ-91s. That is a big missile — each one weighs 600 [kilograms],” Cliff said. “Something like the C-701 [117 kilograms] seems more plausible. I doubt if the Z-18 can carry 32 sonobuoys, four anti-submarine torpedoes, and four [anti-ship cruise missiles] all at the same time.”

Other problems include the lack of long-range radar and anti-submarine fixed-wing aircraft, Fisher said.

James Bussert, co-author of the book, “People’s Liberation Army Navy: Combat Systems Technology,” said Liaoning will need to add shore-based maritime patrol aircraft, such as the Tupolev Tu-154 ASW aircraft and the Shaanxi Y-8 airborne early warning and control aircraft, “because they are within range of most carrier operation areas and provide unique capabilities not on the carrier’s aircraft, such as long loiter time, extreme range and room for several sensors, communications and weapons not available to helicopters.” He also said the lack of a carrier onboard delivery aircraft, such as the US Navy’s C-2 Greyhound, limits the carrier’s logistics capability.

Fisher said these deficiencies will likely be corrected with future aircraft carriers, which are expected to be larger and use flat conventional takeoff decks and catapult launch for heavier fighters, plus fixed-wing radar and anti-submarine patrol aircraft.

Fisher said that in the South China Sea, Liaoning’s carrier air wing could assist China’s imposition of gradual military control of the area. Along with supporting naval forces, Liaoning could deter attacks from Vietnam or dominate the lightly armed Philippine Navy, Fisher said.

“It could also complement combat aircraft deployed to Woody Island in the Paracel Group to counter future US air and naval forces deployed to Philippine bases,” he said

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

New details have emerged on the aircraft lineup for the new carrier Liaoning, which analysts say is a “plausible” mix of foreign-designed fighter jets and various helicopters, yet limited due to its lack of other necessary aircraft.

"Foreign-designed?" J-15s? I could believe there was some non-Chinese technical assistance by hook or crook, but "foreign-designed" is wrong. The Defense News could use more Deinos on their staff and less Windell Minnicks.
 

shen

Senior Member
"Foreign-designed?" J-15s? I could believe there was some non-Chinese technical assistance by hook or crook, but "foreign-designed" is wrong. The Defense News could use more Deinos on their staff and less Windell Minnicks.

the author of that article is probably trying to influence the US government to lift its arms embargo against China. look, they can buy everything from Europeans anyway, let's make some money too!
 

A.Man

Major
The military denied that the two carrier pilots sacrifice in carrier testing


军方否认两名舰载机飞行员在航母测试中牺牲

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


人民网北京9月7日电 (闫嘉琪)近日,多家媒体的新闻标题称“两名空军飞行员在航母测试中牺牲”。人民网记者今日采访军方人士确认,该消息系误读,2名殉职者并非执行航母测试任务,也非执行舰载战斗机试飞任务的飞行员。

近日,记者在微博上发现很多人在转载“两名空军飞行员在航母测试中牺牲 ”的消息,参与转发的账号中不乏一些知名媒体的法人微博账号。记者搜索互联网新闻,也发现不少以此为标题的新闻报道。

追溯这些报道来源,发现该消息源自8月27日新华网标题为“中央军委主席习近平签署命令 给1个单位、1名个人授予荣誉称号”的报道。该报道的主要内容是中央军委授予空军某试飞大队“英雄试飞大队”荣誉称号,授予海军某舰载航空兵部队副部队长戴明盟“航母战斗机英雄试飞员”荣誉称号。在这篇报道中,有这样一段话:“命令指出,长期以来,该大队坚持以发展民族航空事业和建设强大空中力量为使命,教育引导试飞员把个人理想融入强军实践,官兵始终保持了旺盛斗志;积极探索理论、参与设计、试验飞行,圆满完成各项试验试飞任务,填补我国航空领域13项空白;自觉抵制诱惑、坦然面对生死,多次挑战装备和生理极限,有2名同志献出生命。特别是为圆满完成歼-15飞机在辽宁舰上成功实施阻拦着舰和滑跃起飞任务做出重大贡献。”其实,我们仔细阅读新华网的报道,很容易就会发现,该报道只是说该大队在长期的试飞中曾经有2人献出生命,并没有指出这两名殉职者是在航母测试中献出生命,也没有透露出任何有关二人是在执行歼-15舰载机任务时殉职的意思。就是这样一句并不容易引起误解的话,在时隔一个多星期后,在9月6日被某网站篡改标题,以“官方宣布两名空军飞行员在航母测试中牺牲”为标题进行再次传播、扩散,随后在微博上进一步发酵,造成网友误解。

auto translation:

People's Daily, Beijing, September 7 (by Yan Jiaqi) Recently, a number of media headlines said, "The two Air Force pilots in aircraft testing at the expense of. " People with reporters today, military sources confirmed that the news department misread, two killed were not perform carrier testing tasks, the pilots not related to the carrier flight tests.

Recently, the reporter found that many people on the microblogging reproduced in "two air force pilots killed in aircraft test" message, forwarding account to participate in the corporate media are a number of well-known microblogging account. Search Internet news reporter also found a lot of this as the title of the news reports.

Traced the source of these reports and found that the message originated from August 27 Xinhua titled "CMC Chairman Xi Jinping signed an order to a unit, an individual awarded the honorary title of" reports. The main contents of the report of the Central Military Commission awarded an Air Force flight brigade "Hero flight brigade" Honor, awarded a Navy carrier-based air force deputy Deming Union troops long "aircraft carrier fighter test pilot hero," the honorary title. In this report, there is this passage: "command noted that for a long time, which adhere to the development of national aviation brigade and the construction of a powerful air forces for the mission to educate and guide test pilot personal ideals into practice a strong army, officers and soldiers always maintained strong fighting spirit; actively explore the theory involved in the design, test flight, the successful completion of the test flight mission, to fill the aviation field of 13 blank; consciously resist the temptation, frankly facing death, several challenges equipment and physiological limits, there are two comrades lost their lives, especially for the successful completion of the J-15 aircraft successfully implemented in Liaoning ship stop landing and flying leaps slippery task to make a significant contribution. "In fact, we carefully read the Xinhua report, it's easy to find the reported only that the brigade in the long-term test flight had two people lost their lives, and did not point out that two deceased person is given their lives in aircraft testing, nor reveal any information about the two ships in the implementation of the J-15 When the carrier aircraft killed mean task. Is such a sentence is not misleading, then, after a lapse of more than one week later, on September 6 is a website tampered heading to the "official announcement of two Air Force test pilots died in the aircraft" as the title to spread again, the proliferation of , followed by further fermentation in the microblogging, causing users misunderstanding.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top