I thought we agreed that Xi was the one pulling the coup?That was beyond funny, or how Xi was couped because he was self isolating after having traveled.
I thought we agreed that Xi was the one pulling the coup?That was beyond funny, or how Xi was couped because he was self isolating after having traveled.
Didn't the coup also involved a 100m tall skeleton marking towards Beijing? I remember seeing that video.I thought we agreed that Xi was the one pulling the coup?
A visit would sabotage their political fortunes.Looks like AfD is more China friendly than I thought. I originally only read these two articles by Maximilian Krah who was a AfD MEP and vice chair of Europe-China friendly group in European Parliament (欧洲议会欧中友好小组副主席) ?
Then I remembered this interview by one of the two leaders of AfD shows a friendly stance towards China IMO.
Today I came across info on the other leader of AfD, Alice Weidel. CCTV interviewed her before
Check out her Wikipedia profile
Maybe the CPC International Dept should pay them a visit before the next Germany election.
Reminds me of this famous dialogue
Beijing actually doesn't exist anymore. That skeleton flattened the entire city. All videos of Beijing are green screens.Didn't the coup also involved a 100m tall skeleton marking towards Beijing? I remember seeing that video.
Having said that, what's wrong with Thuringia actually? That Bundesland has been hotbed for AfD.Problem is, germany is lib scum territory, any diverging opinion is holocaust and anti gay.
Don't really know what caused this as (inter-)country wide phenomena, I don't even know why people support ACAB, only the Mutt police and maybe the other angloids are that level of BS. German Police is quite tame compared to the mutt's.
I presume no real realpolitik except being americas dog was formulated after reunification with the east, causing a value vacuum and a senseless existence for all millenials and gen Z in germany regarding a common goal for the country.
Not gonna be apologetic for AfD but their racist nutjobbery is never so hyper focused on the asians as the Republican's.
Asians actually get most often a pass, since most AfD people dont believe in covid anyways, so not much fault in China for "spreading the virus to the woeld".
Also Chinese usually dont rape minors, some certain groups do that more frequently.
Krah once interviewed by Guancha, was super based, enough to trigger a Chinese libz profLooks like AfD is more China friendly than I thought. I originally only read these two articles by Maximilian Krah who was a AfD MEP and vice chair of Europe-China friendly group in European Parliament (欧洲议会欧中友好小组副主席) ?
Then I remembered this interview by one of the two leaders of AfD shows a friendly stance towards China IMO.
Today I came across info on the other leader of AfD, Alice Weidel. CCTV interviewed her before
Check out her Wikipedia profile
Maybe the CPC International Dept should pay them a visit before the next Germany election.
Reminds me of this famous dialogue
You have made an error, not even South Korea became advanced due to the US and its democratic fairy tale model, it's not the cause.
It is propaganda that sadly many South Koreans probably also fall today and want to go against what made them rich in the first place.
It was a very dirt poor failure country, even more inferior than NK, until a 100% dictator called Park Chung Hee came into power in 1961,
And he introduced some autocratic economic policies like fostering national champions (chaebols) inspired by Japanese zaibatsu which were introduced in the 19th century during the Meiji Restoration (he grew up inside and admired imperial Japan, was like a fanboy).
If I were to place that political and economic model he introduced into SK at that time, which catapulted them into growing economically for the first time and gave them modernization, it is 10 times closer to the current Chinese model than the US model of today or at that time.
That's how SK developed. Picked the most successful businesses at the time and started favoring them on a government level, made them exist with no competition, no price wars, so fully focused on research and development, innovation, expanding abroad, and exports.
And that model can only be done with an authoritative political leadership, not US-based fairy tale democracy and other bullshit.
There are literally 0 examples in the history of humankind that today's US idiocracy democracy managed to develop any country.
Every major power in the history of humankind initially developed and modernized while they were autocratic (western colonial monarchy powers, imperial Meiji Restoration Japan, today's CCP China).
The political model of liberal oligarchic democracy never managed to develop anything, meanwhile, autocratic models closer to today's China did many times in history.
Chinese political and economical model of how to run a country is around 10 times superior to the current model the West has to offer.
The West is rich today not because of their inferior systems, but because they got the beginner advantage way back during the colonial period when they were autocracies. But they believe in their system like it is some kind of religion, and that's why they don't realize these truths.
Which part do you specifically disagree with? We do need to address anti-Asian bias. It’s an imperfect system. But you do realize that the majority of Harvard’s students are NOT white, with Asians making up the largest group of minorities (30%).@Petrolicious88 will just about justify everything under the sun that's being done against Asian/Chinese descent for myriad of f..d up reasons as he wonderfully exhibited in his prior posts regarding the supposed "need" for affirmative action in academic institutions fearing that it'll become too CHINESE for his liking. In my opinion, our friend here is already slick with his take on the Chinese government policies, system of government and just about anything that China is not doing right in his assessment.
Like what? Name a few please? Got the sense China is perfect from all the past posts. Someone here once defended the Cultural Revolution as necessary.China isn't without flaws, faults, or blemishes that needs urgent but prudent and wise handling whatever the issues.
I enjoyed many of your comments just like I enjoyed Modi’s victory speeches on Hindu nationalism. They sound very similar.The guys arguments, views, and style of debate almost come across like his from the land of many different gods, yoga, and Modi.
I think I know why they're acting so nice recently.Chad New Zealand PM: and whatever form of government China has is for the Chinese people to decide"
The spy agency classified the youth organisation of AfD, the Young Alternatives, and two other organisations, the Institute for State Policy and the “One Percent” association, as “extremist entities” pursuing aims against the constitution.
The new classification could affect members’ ability to be employed in the public sector or to get licences for weapons.
The Young Alternatives said it was not surprised by the decision, saying the spy agency was “simply doing its job, which essentially consists of repressing the opposition”, adding it would take legal steps against the classification.
Japan and S. Korea should be careful. If there's one thing Indians are exceptional at is climbing ladders, especially the corporate and political ladders. A Western-aligned India may in time be able to domineer the South Koreans and Japanese as junior partners as they've become overly committed to the US ladder. I have no doubt that more and more Indian talent finds its way into positions of power in Washington D.C. and Wall Street and drive a more Indian-friendly policy from and within America.The non-white world wants to move away from the West. The only non-white ones that side with the US have been brainwashed because of Christianity and/or they want to think they're white hence why would they want to side with the inferiors?
Just like I've been pointing to how Europe has very little natural, especially strategic, resources of their own, the worse can be said of Japan and South Korea. If you've noticed the US dictates to all its allies' foreign policy telling them who they have relations and trade with. Japan and South Korea ride on the US coattails so they can concentrate on economics meaning also they need the US to get what they want from other countries. I just read an article on how Blinken had to report to South Korea on his talks with China. Blinken had to press for South Korean interests to China. They couldn't do that on their own? That basically sums it up that US allies need US muscle to get what they want in the world. One of the reasons China's neighbors hate China is because they're always in China's shadow. They're never seen as "more" important except in Western antagonism of China. If China was to all of the sudden surrender and be a lapdog of the US and the West, China's neighbors would be overshadowed and invisible again.
Japan and South Korea can't turn their backs on the US. The US built this ladder they tell the world goes to the top. In order for the world to climb this ladder, you have to follow US Western rules. This ladder has only room for one to climb up at a time. The only way you can rise is wait until the person above you climbs up at their own pace or you knock them off the ladder but the higher ground has the advantage. Since the US and the West dictate the rules, they're the ones highest up on the rungs of the hierarchy of this ladder.
So where's China in all of this? Over there climbing on its own ladder they built unimpeded by anyone above or below. China is now up there about to surpass the US. Before China, the world was crowding climbing up the US's ladder. Now that the world sees China climbing its own ladder, they're abandoning the US ladder to build their own or climbing up China's. And look at the US's allies angry that China didn't follow their rules seeing China climbing higher than them. They can't abandon the US's ladder because they already spent too much time and resources climbing up it. It would be like starting over from square one all over again. For Japan and South Korea what use to look like they were up there on the higher end of the US's ladder when the world was trying to climb it. Now they're on the tail end.
For petty Asian nationalists, they're okay if they're not number one just as long as they're higher up than mostly everyone else. The classic definition of a sycophant.