Yeah, disinformation laws. They mean censorship of other worldviews like the Russian, Chinese and other peoples who do not subscribe to their liberal hegemonical views.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Pretty much that is it.
State apperatus is one hand of the Emperor, army is the other hand. Both are to be loyal to the Emperor. Now just replace emperor with CPC.
In Chinese political philosophy, there are two concepts that are erronously translated to English word state. One is 天下/社稷 which means the whole political structure, the other is 政府 which is the narrow sense of state, better translated to government. The emperor is the representation of the first concept, the government is the narrow sense. Also important to remember is that army has never been a branch of the government, but rather a parallel branch directly under the control of the emperor. This is the same in pre-morden western world as well. The so called "army loyal to the state" is a concept in the west after the Kings lost their political role to the parliment or congress. In constitutional mornach, the parliment is the owner of the state by forcing the King to give up, in a republic like US it is the congress who founded the state through war of independence and owns the state. However in PRC, it is CPC who founded the state instead of some sort of congress, therefor CPC took over the role of emperor, and the army should be loyal only to CPC.
Stealth material tech pass tests very recently and Su-57 new production line is upcoming. so it was premature to built many of them.
I have read latest Russian engines can deal with volcanic rash better and will be ready from the start to deal with desert storms.
Note that it only requires acceptance of CPC leadership overall and to basically, do the basic job of a soldier. I don't think there's any army in the world where laziness, treachery and cowardice are rewarded, after all. It does not say they have to obey Xi Jinping's personal orders.
Technically this means that the army is personally loyal to a single person, the president. It does not say 'accept the leadership of the president'. It says obey their orders. That means the president can theoretically give a personal command to a private to do something, and they must do it.
Compare: theoretically accepting the overall leadership of a collective group, vs personally obeying a single man's direct command.
I wonder why they never talk about how the South Korean military swore an oath to the "eternal glory of the Korean race".
Compare with Nazi German Wehrmacht oath in 1933:
British armed services only swear loyalty to the person of the King/Queen of the UK and the dynasty. They have zero allegiance to Parliament or the people of the UK. The "dignity" of the dynasty gets a mention, the people do not.
Once they start really playing this 'whose military actually belongs to the state' game, they might find some uncomfortable truths. Hope they understand this.
supercat
Major
Mike "We lie, We cheat, We steal" Pompeo - nuff said.
A lot of Westerns are really pissed off now.
Schrodinger's Xi Jinping:
A lot of Westerns are really pissed off now.
Schrodinger's Xi Jinping:
Current regime is geopolitically hostile but supports buying renewable energy and EVs which China dominates at.
AFD is more EU skeptical but are going to destroy Germany's native renewable and EV industries while promoting fossil fuels that Germany doesn't have, but Russia does.
heads China wins, tails Germany loses.