Miscellaneous News

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
You have made an error, not even South Korea became advanced due to the US and its democratic fairy tale model, it's not the cause.
The US initially was a poor resource colony. They started massively growing after they imposed huge tariffs on manufactured goods so products would be made in the US instead. They also used the revenues of those tariffs to improve infrastructure in the US.
This is called the "American School" of economics or the "National System".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This way of economic thinking started out with Alexander Hamilton. Similar policies were made elsewhere including in South Korea. South Korea had stiff tariffs on imported consumer electronics products for example which is why Samsung grew to have such economic relevance in the sector in the first place.
 

Eventine

Junior Member
Registered Member
You have made an error, not even South Korea became advanced due to the US and its democratic fairy tale model, it's not the cause.

It is propaganda that sadly many South Koreans probably also fall today and want to go against what made them rich in the first place.

It was a very dirt poor failure country, even more inferior than NK, until a 100% dictator called Park Chung Hee came into power in 1961,

And he introduced some autocratic economic policies like fostering national champions (chaebols) inspired by Japanese zaibatsu which were introduced in the 19th century during the Meiji Restoration (he grew up inside and admired imperial Japan, was like a fanboy).

If I were to place that political and economic model he introduced into SK at that time, which catapulted them into growing economically for the first time and gave them modernization, it is 10 times closer to the current Chinese model than the US model of today or at that time.

That's how SK developed. Picked the most successful businesses at the time and started favoring them on a government level, made them exist with no competition, no price wars, so fully focused on research and development, innovation, expanding abroad, and exports.

And that model can only be done with an authoritative political leadership, not US-based fairy tale democracy and other bullshit.
There are literally 0 examples in the history of humankind that today's US idiocracy democracy managed to develop any country.

Every major power in the history of humankind initially developed and modernized while they were autocratic (western colonial monarchy powers, imperial Meiji Restoration Japan, today's CCP China).

The political model of liberal oligarchic democracy never managed to develop anything, meanwhile, autocratic models closer to today's China did many times in history.

Chinese political and economical model of how to run a country is around 10 times superior to the current model the West has to offer.

The West is rich today not because of their inferior systems, but because they got the beginner advantage way back during the colonial period when they were autocracies. But they believe in their system like it is some kind of religion, and that's why they don't realize these truths.
More importantly, South Korea is, in the sense of birth rates and demographics, becoming a failed state.

North Korea is more healthy in that respect.

Peak South Korea was probably ten years ago, when Samsung was dominating electronics, Hyundai was doing well in automobiles, and the Korean Wave was sweeping through the world. But the long-term verdict on the country is still out. If in fifty years, we see an extremely aged South Korea that can barely keep its society running, much less put up a fight against North Korea, who then will still say that South Korea got the better deal?
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
Biden administration doesn't even know the basic etiquette of diplomacy. Or the US has been the sole superpower for a long time and forgotten about basic manner.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Yes, in English medium, the word dictator is an insult. But IMO the appropriate answer from China would be silence or this.
1687707683892.png

Getting triggered by ideological American insults is letting Americans set the narrative. Modern liberalism is almost a religion. Trying to prove you are not a dictatorship is not only futile (because their media and political class will continue saying you are a dictatorship regardless) but it also feeds liberalism according to which western democracy is inherently moral and everything else is illegitimate. Really though, Biden calling Xi dictator is like MBS calling Biden an infidel. There would be no point for Biden to refute. He is not a Muslim. If he tried to prove he was not an infidel he would have only served MBS' goal.
 
Top