What do you mean? I see this in Canada and am extremely happy. This kind of behavior needs to happen more in all the Five Eyes countries.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Because those you'd pay to see nude, well, get paid to go nude
This is why we need to have socialism world wide.
If this is was a psyops the following couple of weeks will be really interesting.
Does makes me think this really might be the first time a great power could execute such a big psyops confusing their enemies because the coupe mostly took place on social media.
You have made an error, not even South Korea became advanced due to the US and its democratic fairy tale model, it's not the cause.
It is propaganda that sadly many South Koreans probably also fall today and want to go against what made them rich in the first place.
It was a very dirt poor failure country, even more inferior than NK, until a 100% dictator called Park Chung Hee came into power in 1961,
And he introduced some autocratic economic policies like fostering national champions (chaebols) inspired by Japanese zaibatsu which were introduced in the 19th century during the Meiji Restoration (he grew up inside and admired imperial Japan, was like a fanboy).
If I were to place that political and economic model he introduced into SK at that time, which catapulted them into growing economically for the first time and gave them modernization, it is 10 times closer to the current Chinese model than the US model of today or at that time.
That's how SK developed. Picked the most successful businesses at the time and started favoring them on a government level, made them exist with no competition, no price wars, so fully focused on research and development, innovation, expanding abroad, and exports.
And that model can only be done with an authoritative political leadership, not US-based fairy tale democracy and other bullshit.
There are literally 0 examples in the history of humankind that today's US idiocracy democracy managed to develop any country.
Every major power in the history of humankind initially developed and modernized while they were autocratic (western colonial monarchy powers, imperial Meiji Restoration Japan, today's CCP China).
The political model of liberal oligarchic democracy never managed to develop anything, meanwhile, autocratic models closer to today's China did many times in history.
Chinese political and economical model of how to run a country is around 10 times superior to the current model the West has to offer.
The West is rich today not because of their inferior systems, but because they got the beginner advantage way back during the colonial period when they were autocracies. But they believe in their system like it is some kind of religion, and that's why they don't realize these truths.
Last edited:
We really really need the barf emoji on this forum. Please mods.
Also idk why some people are bashing the relationship with NK. China is getting a lot of returns from NK, just not economically.
Yeah, it's not the most developed place in the region, but neither was SK. SK only pulled ahead due to collapse of the USSR and the consequent western looting that let them get a boost. NK is still better developed than much of south east asia.
But the main thing NK provides is military. They have a million man army and massive amounts of reliable, older surplus gear, which they're experienced with using. They're essentially the Ukraine of Asia. Dogshit civilian development (which btw, NK might in the near future surpass Ukraine in), but fanatical and well armed enough to be more than just a speed bump even for superpower militaries.
Having that type of ally is not easy to get. Even though it might benefit the NK civilian living standard more if China annexed the area and turned it into Hongkong but big, such a move would not be legal, would create understandable resentment by the locals.
And it would also not necessarily help China that much, because there are other areas inside China that are better off being economically developed first before China needs to worry about expanding using economical vassals.
I.e. Why make NK into Guangdong 2.0 when China hasn't even made Xinjiang or Qinghai into Guangdong 2.0 first? Beijing would have better control and better ability to exploit those 2 vs exploiting a nominally independent NK.
Yeah, it's not the most developed place in the region, but neither was SK. SK only pulled ahead due to collapse of the USSR and the consequent western looting that let them get a boost. NK is still better developed than much of south east asia.
But the main thing NK provides is military. They have a million man army and massive amounts of reliable, older surplus gear, which they're experienced with using. They're essentially the Ukraine of Asia. Dogshit civilian development (which btw, NK might in the near future surpass Ukraine in), but fanatical and well armed enough to be more than just a speed bump even for superpower militaries.
Having that type of ally is not easy to get. Even though it might benefit the NK civilian living standard more if China annexed the area and turned it into Hongkong but big, such a move would not be legal, would create understandable resentment by the locals.
And it would also not necessarily help China that much, because there are other areas inside China that are better off being economically developed first before China needs to worry about expanding using economical vassals.
I.e. Why make NK into Guangdong 2.0 when China hasn't even made Xinjiang or Qinghai into Guangdong 2.0 first? Beijing would have better control and better ability to exploit those 2 vs exploiting a nominally independent NK.
And exactly the reason why the US pushes liberal democracy like a drug dealer, knowing full well such system kneecaps economic and industrial development while giving them the opportunity to influence/control governments via elections and/or regime change.
The victory of June 4th 1989 was perhaps one of the greatest events of human history.
Even if sarcasm it is an astoundingly dumb thing to say.