Totally agree with your assessments and observations on China's perplexing foreign policy approach even with its own supposed allies. Either Chinese leadership are GUN SHY, AFRAID TO MAKE THEIR HANDS DIRTY or NAIVE ON THE REALITIES OF THE WORLD in which they are surrounded with UNCERTAINTIES, UNPREDICTABILITY, AND WAR THAT CAN AND WILL ERUPT at her doorstep like it or not.
Somehow, in my ignorant and rather elementary views of China's foreign policy they are just not at all interested in offering any security details to would be countries. The relationships are rather transactional and not all deep or culturally encompassing that enables China's hard earned investment aren't washed away in one fell swoop through internal coup directed by the West, informational greyzone tactics ably applied by India. China plays defensively everywhere or at least perceived to be defensive and reactive in many if not most of its dealings. Take the case of Italy abruptly ending its BRI initiative with China, and the blatant theft of one of it's business with Perelli tires essentially neutering Chinese company into irrelevance. Am I supposed to believe that China was not aware that such a plan from the incoming and now Italian government were not foreseen? What's the point of those intelligence services that China employs and funds with giant budgets?
For all the criticisms I have of India, in my mind, they know how to fight back the information war rightly or wrongly. I just find some of the Chinese thinking and approach rather child like with the idiocy that if only they would work harder, and keep talking about win-win the western world will finally see the virtue of Chinese way. I understand it's a strawman argument am making but it's the impression I have made.
But, am obviously making my points from a far since I have not been to the country in a while. I am quite interested in the opinions of our members here to point out the errors of my perception and thinking with regards to China's foreign policy approach vis-à-vis ACTUAL ACTIVE INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER COUNTRIES AFFAIRS.
CPC leadership isn't naive about the world, in fact its understanding is comprehensive, with very sharp intel, the way Wang Yi and now Qin Gang go around engaging and sealing deals indicate this.
So I would put it down to being gun shy and very risk adverse, and I speculate the leadership would want to wait until China strengths in tech & food self-sufficiencies are fully developed before we really swing our weight around. The next generation of leaders, those who grew up in the 80s and 90s, and experienced nothing but growth and wealth would be more aggressive, by which time we can well afford to meddle in other countries' affairs if they don't properly behave.


