This is the same logic that people used to support the Putin 4D chess master theory...
No, it isn't. The logic the people used for the Putin 4D theory is the competence of the Russian government. The logic I'm using is the competence of the Chinese government. I hope you can spot the difference.
From what I could tell, China didn't want the Ukraine war. They poured billions into Ukraine before the war, they knew that the geopolitical situation would be heightened after the War, that the West would unite and start rearming again, they would be upsetting their biggest customers, they would have to disengage from Russia or face sanctions.
China is indifferent to the Ukraine war. Whether it knew about it or not, whether it wants it or not, the situation is out of its hands. The best one can do under those circumstances is adapt, which China has done very well. By the way, I wouldn't take China pouring "billions" into a place to be indicative of anything, billions is pocket change to China.
China is a superpower now.
Good, then maybe the people who got it there know something about how to successfully run a state and its international affairs.
And yes, this failed states shitting the bed is kinda China's fault when it's the main nation enabling them, NK won't exist with Chinese support, Russia won't have started or continued the failing war without China's support and China propping the economy up.
No, it really isn't. Them shitting the bed is a consequence of the choices they made. China is simply continuing normal relations with them because that's in China's interests. China isn't running a rehabilitation program for delinquent countries.
Again, just watch as China does nothing again as Russia just continues to degrade and degrade until you got another dozen nuclear armed rouge states all bordering China.
It won't happen. Like everything you've written here, that's far-fetched and has nothing to do with reality.
Just as America made post war western Europe, Korea and Japan wealthy by opening its markets to them, China should offer better market access and investment.
That's a gross abuse of history. America didn't "make" these countries anything, they were already developed long before America was. What America did was conquer them and put them in its pocket after they stupidly smashed themselves in WWII.
China already offers generous market access and investment, it's up to the recipient countries to make use of those opportunities. That's a tall ask, especially when a lot of those countries are rampantly Sinophobic.
Oh, well. Their choice.
Spreading belt and road over the entire world is just not very effective.
I think it's very effective. I can give a laundry list of reasons why, but the clincher is the Chinese government thinks it's effective.
But even with Pakistan, there is limited help with their political problems that are turning them into a failed state. Russia, Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, Myanmar and many others need help and protection.
First, I wouldn't put Russia in that camp despite its problems and failures. Second, development is just not in the cards for some cultures. It's just a harsh truth of the world we live in and there's nothing China can do about it. China tried with Pakistan and it got nowhere.
These countries don't need China's help. They need to understand development should be their #1-99 priority and act like it.
So yes, China should help others sort out their issues.
You can't help those who do not want to help themselves.