Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
E100 said:
Found some info as to why the Iranian respose was so weak:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

TLDR: The president was a gullible fool who thought the west could be trusted. He ended up torpedoing his countries reputation and now has Iranian citizens protesting at his front door when this truth came to light. Some of the posts perfectly show my thoughts.
Click to expand...
Good to see someone whom I assume is an Iranian calling this dickhead of a President out. Still, there has to be a significant part of the Iranian population who voted this clown into power, and that should be very concerning if you're an Iranian patriot. These people may not all be evil, but they are capitulating to the West, just like the Soviet citizens who capitulated to the West in 1989-1991. For Iran's sake, they must stop this grave mistake now, or be condemned to decades of humiliation.

I am very concerned for the safety of the Ayatollah now. His old brothers in resistance are being killed one by one, and that list is getting shorter and shorter. His own nation is infested with wimps and traitors. His own IRGC is also horribly compromised. The Israelis have kill Haniyeh on Iranian soil, under the supposed heavy protection of the IRGC. President Pezeshkian and his kind are weaklings at best, or traitors at worse. He had already defied direct instructions from his own Supreme leader to retaliate against Israel. Who is to say that he might potentially betray his Ayatollah? Iran needs to clean house now!
 
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
zhangjim said:
This indicates a politically incorrect fact: extreme violence can make weak countries submit.
To be honest, this gave me a terrible idea: perhaps we should learn to deal with the Philippines like the Israelis did. Using a 2000 pound bomb can solve many problems.
Click to expand...
Certainly if China were to head to war, it must harden it's heart many more times than Israel and even Russia. 1000s of bombs in a week will not achieve the shock needed to break lines, not even 10 000s like Russia could field.

China has the industry and economy, but the question is, are there enough people follow up on occupation and to press all the triggers? I'm betting a lot on the new generation of Chinese, the 0-30 yr olds who grew up unopposed, to react with extreme organized violence if they are obstructed. China will need this generation, because there is not enough room to keep growing peacefully.

Beijing has reached the low/middle end of Europe living standards without fighting directly or creating a solid network of states to feed it. But it is already the largest economy in the world and there's not much room to grow from there. The answer is clear, it's the enemy nations that have to take a hit to their living standards so China can keep going. I'm not just saying it out of selfishness (which is nothing wrong either, China should take back its historical spot as undisputed no1), I also believe that in the long term, a China led hegemony will protect the most amount of people from upcoming climate change and population crises. Because the alternative is having someone like Trump be in charge of deciding the fate for billions of Africans, Latin Americans and Indians...
 
A

Arij Javaid

Junior Member
Registered Member
Index said:
Certainly if China were to head to war, it must harden it's heart many more times than Israel and even Russia. 1000s of bombs in a week will not achieve the shock needed to break lines, not even 10 000s like Russia could field.

China has the industry and economy, but the question is, are there enough people follow up on occupation and to press all the triggers? I'm betting a lot on the new generation of Chinese, the 0-30 yr olds who grew up unopposed, to react with extreme organized violence if they are obstructed. China will need this generation, because there is not enough room to keep growing peacefully.

Beijing has reached the low/middle end of Europe living standards without fighting directly or creating a solid network of states to feed it. But it is already the largest economy in the world and there's not much room to grow from there. The answer is clear, it's the enemy nations that have to take a hit to their living standards so China can keep going. I'm not just saying it out of selfishness (which is nothing wrong either, China should take back its historical spot as undisputed no1), I also believe that in the long term, a China led hegemony will protect the most amount of people from upcoming climate change and population crises. Because the alternative is having someone like Trump be in charge of deciding the fate for billions of Africans, Latin Americans and Indians...
Click to expand...
The Chinese have shown that they are resistant to any form of force during the Japanese terrorist occupation.
 
S

SanWenYu

Major
Registered Member
Arij Javaid said:
Phull SAPPORT Sarr wasn't a joke. Seems like India has changed its one pro-palestinian stance it held during congress era to a pro-israel stance which means it is the only country in BRICS which has this stance while Russia, China have all come out in support of Palestine.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
Are there still many Indians working labour jobs in the rich Muslim countries these days? I have not heard any of the Muslin countries pushing back when India showing all kinds of hostility towards Muslims in and out of its borders.
 
F

fishrubber99

Junior Member
Registered Member
Israel is very close to launch a ground invasion of Lebanon:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


There is currently a UN contingent with Chinese peacekeepers in Lebanon, whose barracks was recently shaken by a nearby Israeli strike a week ago:

I wonder what would happen in Chinese domestic politics if a Chinese UN peacekeeper is killed due to Israel on the National Day of the PRC, which is October 1st (today in China). It might actually force Chinese leadership to do something more significant with regards to Israel and the Middle East to stem the outrage that would inevitably result from this.
 
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
Arij Javaid said:
The Chinese have shown that they are resistant to any form of force during the Japanese terrorist occupation.
Click to expand...
Being resistant to attack is good, but it's not quite the same as having the killing attitude to attack others.

Of course, one way to quick "fix" that is to have a 9/11 of our own, to make the majority believe we are attacking in the purpose of defense.

But I think overall the most important is having the right education. China needs to teach patriotism.
SanWenYu said:
Are there still many Indians working labour jobs in the rich Muslim countries these days? I have not heard any of the Muslin countries pushing back when India showing this kind of hostility towards Muslims in and out of its borders.
Click to expand...
Indians there just switch on their bootlicking mode to avoid suspicion. When a Muslim massa is looking at them, they're furiously scrubbing toilets and shouting yes saar. When theyre on break, they go on twitter and post images of Muhammed licking toilet bowls.
 
Randomuser

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
SanWenYu said:
Are there still many Indians working labour jobs in the rich Muslim countries these days? I have not heard any of the Muslin countries pushing back when India showing all kinds of hostility towards Muslims in and out of its borders.
Click to expand...
At least Arabs in Saudi Arabia and Dubai they probably know but don't care. After all Indians there have no real rights so they can hate all they want when the master turns away but when the master comes, he could pretty much kill them and get away with it. For some reason only those guys know how to properly deal with Indians and nullify their in group preference advantage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top