Miscellaneous News

[bebops]

U.S cannot match warship building capacity at a 1 to 1 ratio vs China. However U.S is trying to beef up building more stealth missiles and other variety of missiles to prepare for 2027 or 2030.

Like I said, you need many many fighter jets to maintain dominance at that region. It is easier to launch stealth missiles then head back to the base. rinse and repeat. I say go 75% effort should be focused on land based forces and fighter jets buillding.

The next combat is about overwhelming your opponent with swarms of everything.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Arij Javaid]

U.S cannot match warship building capacity at a 1 to 1 ratio vs China. However U.S is trying to beef up building more stealth missiles and other variety of missiles to prepare for 2027 or 2030.

Like I said, you need many many fighter jets to maintain dominance at that region. It is easier to launch stealth missiles then head back to the base. rinse and repeat. I say go 75% effort should be focused on land based forces and fighter jets buillding.

The next combat is about overwhelming your opponent with swarms of everything.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Time is on china's side here as china has an outproduce US × Time advantage.

 

[ansy1968]

The CPC won’t follow Anglo practices which makes someone like me seethe and rage because I do want a Chinese expeditionary force to mount a generations long liberation/conquest of the North American and Australian continents from the anglos. The Chinese gov and party elites will never sanction such a thing and there’s no way for me to do a Rothschild of the 19th c. And subvert the CPC into endorsing my dreams of conquest and revenge.

I know how you feel bro and I share your view when I was young, we're Chauvinist YES!!! BUT Not ARROGANT. As wisdom come with age I realized we Chinese don't stood down on their level and give them the satisfaction they seek.

 

[bebops]

I find land based multiple rocket launchers to be very effective especially ones like PCL-191. If they can make one that has the range all the way to japan (1000 miles), very maneuverable and has a speed of iskandler, its a game changer.

 

[ansy1968]

I don't think the jury is quite out on Chinese remilitarization yet.

Wittingly or not, CPC is laying the groundwork. Comprehensive tech, industry and economy leads. The next generation will have their own values.

Millennial and onwards Chinese people are used to having about the same or better life quality than the west, and defintely much better than the third world, so react with visceral disdain if these groups try to denigrate them.

If nothing else CPC are good stewards who can pass on the national project of China to the next generation.

Unwittingly the US is helping the CPC to reach its goal and strengthen its national character among its youth for this generation and the next as these rivalry will last until 2050 which is good for my opinion. What I'm afraid of is complacency which will led to decay and stagnation, the reason why I'm not in favor of a dominant victory over the American as we may inherit the same disease.

 

[zhangjim]

Also, Iran's president is a massive cuck who doesn't seem to have learnt anything from Minsk

This indicates a politically incorrect fact: extreme violence can make weak countries submit.
To be honest, this gave me a terrible idea: perhaps we should learn to deal with the Philippines like the Israelis did. Using a 2000 pound bomb can solve many problems.

 

[Bellum_Romanum]

This indicates a politically incorrect fact: extreme violence can make weak countries submit.
To be honest, this gave me a terrible idea: perhaps we should learn to deal with the Philippines like the Israelis did. Using a 2000 pound bomb can solve many problems.

"Do what must be done; for the strong shall trample the barking chihuahuas"

 

[Eventine]

This indicates a politically incorrect fact: extreme violence can make weak countries submit.
To be honest, this gave me a terrible idea: perhaps we should learn to deal with the Philippines like the Israelis did. Using a 2000 pound bomb can solve many problems.

The US is treaty bound to defend the Philippines if it was attacked. This is one reason it dares to bark loudly despite being weak.

Iran has no such assurance from any great power and has been proven to be weak itself; hence it will suffer what it must as so many weak countries have over the course of history.

 

[iewgnem]

U.S cannot match warship building capacity at a 1 to 1 ratio vs China. However U.S is trying to beef up building more stealth missiles and other variety of missiles to prepare for 2027 or 2030.

Like I said, you need many many fighter jets to maintain dominance at that region. It is easier to launch stealth missiles then head back to the base. rinse and repeat. I say go 75% effort should be focused on land based forces and fighter jets buillding.

The next combat is about overwhelming your opponent with swarms of everything.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Distance is symetrical, if they can hit China, China can hit them, and China has a lot more stealth missiles.

The more interesting question is how far will China push, because China actually have the industrial base and merchant marine to push to California.

 

[iewgnem]

The US is treaty bound to defend the Philippines if it was attacked. This is one reason it dares to bark loudly despite being weak.

Iran has no such assurance from any great power and has been proven to be weak itself; hence it will suffer what it must as so many weak countries have over the course of history.

Theres a reason being America's ally is fatal, Phillipines will learn that in quick order if they actually bites.

And Iran's not the ME country under naval blockade, its people constantly under air raid alerts and its army losings thousands.

Killing civilians isbt strength, winning without fighting is. Its what separates advanced and backward cultures