The only "fair" solution is to abolish the UNSC and veto power. Otherwise, it will always remain a tool for imperialism and oppression. It is essentially an apartheid where UNSC is above the law which it relegates on others. The ability to veto allows SC members to commit any crime they wish without penalty. It's a flawed system.You've got an interesting argument. But you're still not gonna gaslight me. I'm not speaking colonial talk. You use that term cheaply. I'm speaking about realism. I know that you don't like the UN, but it's there whether you like it or not. Historically, the only way that we know of so far to create a new UN is to have another world war, and we don't wanna go there don't we.
It is true that the position of the UNSC permanent five have actually become a tool for imperialism. Especially by the US. Yet I still don't want to see the Big 5 expanded, because most nations are only self interested. I don't want any more countries to join...
We've seen it so many times, the results of this flawed system. For example, Israel had recieved more than 650 resolutions against it (since 1948), for it's crimes and UN violations, passed by large majorities of UN members, all of which were negated and vetoed by an extremely tiny minority (US or UK).
