Miscellaneous News

daifo

Captain
Registered Member
Guys, no need to worry about China

US authorities obtained intelligence from a human source in recent weeks on a plot by Iran to try to assassinate Donald Trump, a development that led to the Secret Service increasing security around the former president in recent weeks, multiple people briefed on the matter told CNN.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
MIGA:

Step 1. Tariff the shit out of China
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US Tariffs at 60% Would Halve China’s Growth Rate, UBS Says​


Step 2. Devalue USD


JD Vance:
View attachment 132531
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump trade advisers plot dollar devaluation​


Step 3. Profit ???
Hehe, another Trump's (US's) game of nothingness. With the trend of dedollarization the value of dollar will go down naturally even if the US tried everything to prevent it. So Trump is running in front of the incoming tzunami as if he is leading the wave, exactly the samething that Obama did in Arab "spring" pretending US was leading something.

The fact is that as a world trading currency, dollar's value was not set by US production, but everyting that is traded in international market including Arab oil, Korean mobile phone, TV, lots of Japanese and European cars etc, even Russian oil and Chinese electronics and machinaries were mostly represented by dollar. Now lots of these are traded in RMB or other currencies and will be more, dollar becomes excessive in supply, representing less products, therefor it will have to devalue. Artificially keeping it high by high interest will hurt US more than saveing like drinking poison to quench thirst.
 
Last edited:

Index

Junior Member
Registered Member
You know, I actually think this could be China's strategy, to get ready to invade Taiwan or destroy TSMC factories.

Let's play Sun Tzu.

What is important to President Trump?

A lot of things, but two things top the list, and that is President Trump cares about the stock market, and President Trump cares about the white blue collar worker.

Without chips, the economy will tank, causing the stock market to fall; and factory production will stop, leading to layoffs.

China will get far more aggressive these coming years in regards of how to handle Taiwan, especially they do not like the current guy there.

In the end, they do not care about Taiwan, compared to the stock market, ie their own money, or their factories, ie their jobs.

So we see how aggressive both sides will be.
If US really intends to invade, it's not unlikely that China will rather choose to scuttle it's own industries that it can't bring back to safety.

But in the past years, it's more clear that Xi's foreign policy will be using lower intensity proxy wars abroad rather than allow the scenario of US full scale invasion in Taiwan to happen. Even though many pundits in China would probably want China to drop ambiguity and order US to stand down on the homefront.

China has already put Russia to work and Russians are almost done with it. Iran hasn't been put to work yet, and Trump is notoriously hateful against Arabs. So there is a natural next step. Plus with Russia soon freed up again, it's possible to start probing the third world even harder, like in Venezuela border, what little remains of French Africa and so on.

I think as long as Xi is driving his politics, there will be no counteroffensive on Taiwan. At most, once US is too over extended, they will be asked to drop all claims. But Xi's ideal politics can be disrupted by either domestic rivals or a too aggressive American state.
 

Iracundus

New Member
Registered Member
I don't think China was ever going for green tech because of climate change either. It's just a cover to bring about an "integrated electric society". No more fuel, electricity directly transformed to movement/logistics.

China is the world's largest energy and energy tech/storage producer. A society where electricity is the new oil makes China the new Saudi Arabia.

And even if no one else is as highly enthusiastic or have the ability to fund a whole society transformation to electric, completing the transformation still has huge geopolitical implications for China.

Current China is oil sufficient with minor rationing using land routes from allies. But that's with nearly a billion cars/trucks wasting oil. When all of those are electric, every bit of oil China produces or imports would go solely to aerospace and navy, meaning China can through strategic petroleum reserve alone be near indefinitely sufficient.

I think there is greater awareness now in China of the longer term negative consequences of unmitigated climate change such as more extreme weather, as well as the more immediate issue of air quality from burning fossil fuels. China improved its air quality since 2010 when the rest of the world did not believe it could do it. The fact that green tech also allows them to leapfrog over the rest of the world’s ICE industries is a big bonus.

My earlier comment was more about how Trump opposes green tech not out of any grand strategic thinking but more about his cultural war against the American liberals. If they want something, he opposes it, regardless of its merit. He now seems to associate electricity and batteries with the liberals. Just do a search for his unhinged speech about batteries on boats and getting eaten by a shark, or his opposition to electromagnetic catapults on carriers.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think there is greater awareness now in China of the longer term negative consequences of unmitigated climate change such as more extreme weather, as well as the more immediate issue of air quality from burning fossil fuels. China improved its air quality since 2010 when the rest of the world did not believe it could do it. The fact that green tech also allows them to leapfrog over the rest of the world’s ICE industries is a big bonus.

My earlier comment was more about how Trump opposes green tech not out of any grand strategic thinking but more about his cultural war against the American liberals. If they want something, he opposes it, regardless of its merit. He now seems to associate electricity and batteries with the liberals. Just do a search for his unhinged speech about batteries on boats and getting eaten by a shark, or his opposition to electromagnetic catapults on carriers.
Good enough for me. Made in will be associated with heavy, inefficient polluting devices fired by a 2000 L gas engine. Made in China is associated with clean, efficient and electric.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
I think there is greater awareness now in China of the longer term negative consequences of unmitigated climate change such as more extreme weather, as well as the more immediate issue of air quality from burning fossil fuels. China improved its air quality since 2010 when the rest of the world did not believe it could do it. The fact that green tech also allows them to leapfrog over the rest of the world’s ICE industries is a big bonus.

My earlier comment was more about how Trump opposes green tech not out of any grand strategic thinking but more about his cultural war against the American liberals. If they want something, he opposes it, regardless of its merit. He now seems to associate electricity and batteries with the liberals. Just do a search for his unhinged speech about batteries on boats and getting eaten by a shark, or his opposition to electromagnetic catapults on carriers.
Good. Maybe he can win his war against libshits and let climate change wipe out their agriculture industries.
 

coolgod

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump on Taxes, Tariffs, Jerome Powell and More​

Trump is cool to the idea of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and to US efforts to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for invading Ukraine. “I don’t love sanctions,” he says. He keeps circling back to William McKinley, who he says raised enough revenue through tariffs during his turn-of-the-20th-century presidency to avoid instituting a federal income tax yet never got the appropriate credit.
Trump’s transactional view of foreign policy and his desire to “win” every deal could have ramifications around the globe—and even rupture US alliances. Asked about America’s commitment to defending Taiwan from China, which views the Asian democracy as a breakaway province, Trump makes it clear that, despite recent bipartisan support for Taiwan, he’s at best lukewarm about standing up to Chinese aggression. Part of his skepticism is grounded in economic resentment. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” he says. “I mean, how stupid are we? They took all of our chip business. They’re immensely wealthy.” What he wants is for Taiwan to pay the US for protection. “I don’t think we’re any different from an insurance policy. Why? Why are we doing this?” he asks.
Another factor driving his skepticism is what he regards as the practical difficulty of defending a small island on the other side of the globe. “Taiwan is 9,500 miles away,” he says. “It’s 68 miles away from China.” Abandoning the commitment to Taiwan would represent a dramatic shift in US foreign policy—as significant as halting support for Ukraine. But Trump sounds ready to radically alter the terms of these relationships.
In Trumpworld, however, Biden’s actions are seen as validation that Trump was right—and his Democratic critics were wrong—about the threat China poses to the US economy and security. Trump is eager to prescribe more of the same medicine, including to European allies. In addition to targeting China for new tariffs of anywhere from 60% to 100%, he says he’d impose a 10% across-the-board tariff on imports from other countries, citing a familiar litany of complaints about foreign countries not buying enough US goods.
“The ‘European Union’ sounds so lovely,” Trump says. “We love Scotland and Germany. We love all these places. But once you get past that, they treat us violently.” He mentions reluctance in Europe to import US automobiles and agricultural products as key drivers of the more than $200 billion trade deficit, a statistic he considers a critical measure of economic fairness.

Trump wants a deal on Taiwan, I think China would oblige.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
JD Vance is married to an openly Hindu Indian woman, and they were introduced by Amy Chua. Yes that Amy Chua.

Make of that what you will.
His wife also taught American history at a university in China.

2006-2009 - Ba, political science, Ohio State University & work for Bob Schuler, Ohio Senate (R)
2013 - Yale (JD, law)
2013-15? - Sidley Austin LLP
2016-2017 - principal at Mithril Capital (Peter Thiel)
2017 - investment partner, Revolution LLC
2017 - CNN contributor
2019 - founder, Narya Capital LLC (with financial backing from Peter Thiel, Eric Schmidt/Google, Marc Andreessen)
So he's part of that whole Yale thing.. which explains his involvement with Thiel. Ngl but Vance gives off gay vibes.

The important question is how and why Vance got involved with Thiel who is a well known neo-feudal far-right radical as well as an active homosexual who nevertheless attempted to hide his sexuality and was famously outed by Gawker.
Far right and homosexual. Lmao
 
Top