You mention 9 to 5 working in office that are low to mid tech Those Mexican not migrate to US and hardly any one educate in US schools. .Trump already said Mexico is not sending there best. Mexico is not attracted to US Soft Power in those kind of jobs.
You just stated a bunch of random facts that don't support your argument.
Mexico is wealthy country once you look at its manufacturing salaries.
You're the first person who has ever characterized Mexico as a wealthy nation. What numbers drew you to that conclusion?
It is due to Demographics of Sweden and Switzerland that they dont have much people to move to US.
The people there don't have a reason to come. Quality of life is high at home.
Japan has even larger and higher quality Auto Industry. why Musk does not go there and start EV revolution?. its even easier as he was using Panasonic batteries, LG/Samsung Semiconductors. Tesla premium vehicles Panasonic batteries have proven for long term less degradation. infact Japan ideal place as right had side would have much easier to export to countries like UK and some others in Asia who follow British driving. Japanese tire giants are more advanced in dealing with emissions.
Deals depend on what the county offered him. If Japan didn't welcome him in order to protect its domestic industry but Germany did, then that's how it happened. Whatever the reason, it's not because Japan lacks "soft power" because that would be as stupid a conclusion as saying Mexico is a wealthy nation.
It only say these things are better without giving any data.
There's data in there but the quality of life, quality of education, oppertunity to make money, are not easily quantifiable. That's not an excuse for you to say that they don't exist and it's "soft power." If you even lived in the real world instead of being hobbled up in your own obscure theoretics in front of a computer screen, you would know that those articles are spot on when it comes to why people come to the US. Every person I know who decided to stay in the US has done so within the reasons outlined in those 2 articles.
i am only pointing out Ethopian airline salary. these things are not cheap to maintain.
And that is completely irrelevent. Many countries, even poor countries, have airlines. They are not cheap. But these countries don't come close to the US in average quality of life.
really Oil and Money?. it just show you havent study this subject.
Yeah, Qatar has oil and money. Everything you have written shows that you don't even live in the real world. Nobody has ever said that the quality of life in Ethiopia/Camaroon is on par with America because there no advanced nation is wealthy. Nobody. It's like arguing that homeless people are the richest because they eat for free in homeless shelters so their wealth is unlimited. You're that stupid.
Aviation is hard power but Airline is soft power and either or both can be strategic. State of Qatar has spent enormous in creating its image and influence in various corners of the world and Russia want to associate with this Soft Power. It has nothing to do with investment of bringing tech or machinery. Its all about Soft Power.
It's called business. Qatar Airways is a business; businesses all over the world don't have hard power. I'm talking about national power, in which case hard power is all. To businesses, they can only have soft power which is the only way businesses have to attract sales. And the result is that it is no power at all because anytime you cross interests with a country with greater hard power, they can ban you and every bit of your soft power is gone instantly. It's useless, but it's all that businesses have. Countries are not the same. Countries kill people for resources and dominance.
Germany raise its importance and forcing US arms on Europe that will give Germany enhance leverage in shaping US policies globally as German acts to unite Europe under US leadership..
Ok there is so much retardation in that sentence that it needs to be cut into pieces to answer. Germany didn't raise it's importance. It's less important now as an economic power because its economy and industry are in decline. Germany didn't force any US arms onto Europe; Ukraine asked for them when Russia invaded. Germany didn't have a say in it. US weapons don't give Germans any leverage in shaping US policies because those 2 have nothing to do with each other; rather, it's the US forcing Germany to give more and more despite its economy already in shambles. Lastly, Germans have no interest uniting Europe under US leadership; they want to be the leaders. America is taking that hope away from them. So, in summary, you wrote a run-on sentence and literally every single part of it was wrong. You're watching a battered and bruised Germany getting bled out by an American vampire and you're characterizing the interaction as the victim controlling his torturer, forcing him to keep beating him up and taking his blood/energy.
Germany has confidence it has Soft Power that Asians will send there products in one sided trade with Europe so Germany may not need those industries related to Oil/Gas.
LOLOLOL Germany gutted it's own industry because Asians will be giving it free shit due to its "soft power"??? Germany pays for everything it buys from Asia. Where does the money come from? You're characterizing one-sided trade as a benefit for Germany when actually one-sided trade running up deficits and debt is what every country aims to avoid.
you really think Germans are stupid.
After Merkel's departure, yes. They cannot do anything but sacrifice themselves for Americans these days.
You are including past data which basically include US as nation of immigrants absorb more people.
Of course, we don't have one day today data. This is America's traditional strength.
but now it has to increasingly compete with Canada , Europe and Mideast who lacks hard power of US but has Soft Power.
It has to increasingly compete with Chinese hard power and money siphoning talent away from the US. I don't see Canada, Europe or the Mideast taking talent away from the US; actually a lot of European talent moved to the US because the financial hardships made high tech industry difficult in Europe. Only hard power, money, qualify of life, can attract meaningful immigration. Soft power only brings in some weird anime freaks to Japan, etc... it is useless.
Soft power is people attitudes and creating better inclusive work environment.
Ohhhhhh, you finally updated your definition of soft power again! First it was nations that didn't typically resort to force. That's of course, wrong. Then, it became to do something voluntarily, which is closer, but cruder than a 5 year old's drawing of the Mona Lisa. Now let's look at it again to see if you've grown...
Soft power is people attitudes
No, soft power is the attempt to influence people's attitudes.
and creating better inclusive work environment.
That's just nonsense and unrelated. Did you just copy that out of some HR pamphlet? LOL Better work environments are created by company policy, which requires the hard power of business success in order to obtain resources and the hard power of competent management. Your last definition, though childish, was actually better.
So, regretably, no. You haven't made any progress since last time on your understanding of "soft power."
