Why would china create another competitors that can threatening their economy in long term future?Considering the reality on the ground between China and India, ie. India's manufactering sector stalling due to lack of technical expertise and fraying relations with the West, I do think China is right to take the risk because therein lies the reasons why the risk might pay off and the benefits, ie. more global market share for Chinese companies and cooperation towards the inception of the BRICS's payment system, outweigh the negatives if the risk fails. And if it does fail what happens? A return military posturing on one of the most inhospitable places on the planet?
I understand the sentiment but I don't fear India at all period; I actually pity them.It definitely will. India's FM Jaishankar already hinted at that recently.
The Chinese government didn't even explain what happened on the border in 2020. According to 茶话会 the incident occurred because the local commanders got uppity and suddenly wanted to attack the Chinese for no reason. I think the more obvious explanation, and one that doesn't give face for Modi is that Covid really impacted his ratings domestically, and he needed something to take the attention away.
Trading away land is not the big deal here, PRC has given away many lands along its border for peace and cooperation. Trading away land to a bordering fascist country which views you as the #1 enemy and has no intention of changing is.
How so?Why would china create another competitors that can threatening their economy in long term future?
To be fair the west probably thought the same when they came to China for help in the 80s. They thought China would never be a real threat and now China might do what the USSR could never. crush the west using its own system against them. Something the USSR could never since they went for idealism over being pragmatic.I understand the sentiment but I don't fear India at all period; I actually pity them.
Instead of building up their economy by being humble and realistic with their current national comprehensive strength they're already playing pretend superpower, not to mention taking credit of establishing organizations like BRICS, SCO etc...when they're more than happy being hoisted as a then budding ally of the U.S. led west. What are they getting in return for cozying up to them you ask? Election interference, meddling in their political system, damaging their oligarch Ambani through a report alleging of the companies shady and bloated financial dealings.
Having said that, I much rather have an India that's growing economically as opposed to having an Indian economically retarded which will only be riped for more western influence and machinations.
A stronger India will at least be able to try and create its own pole that's wholly separate from China/Russia vs U.S. and it's vassals.
I don't understand for some of us here to punish India or even exact some sort of blood debt as a form of payback against their unhinged musings against China. China is that much ahead of India in every conceivable estimation from tech to politics. What's there to gain from beating up a frienemy with some benefits to a complete irredeemable enemy that China had to add on top of the struggle against U.S. and her vassals?
How so?
Some days, the butt hertz is overwhelming.
The Chinese are beating them at certain areas of commerce and technology, then we probably have President Trump returning for an encore.
This is like too much for some to take in the land of NFL football.
Then if their favourite team loses on Sunday, they have to lash out, then go cry in the corner in the dark.
Tough days indeed.
"India's Hypersonic Missile Program To Outpace Global Capabilities" | GRAVITAS | India News | WION
What's the worst case of a powerful India in the future? China is likely going to remain the dominant industrial power for the rest of this century and probably in the next as well. China won't repeat the western mistake of deindustrialization for the sake of short term profit. A powerful future India isn't going to march into China through the Himalayas. They might absorb Bangladesh and Pakistan, but they can't do serious harm to China unless China has a civil war or very poor governance. And a peer competitor in the future might be a good thing to avoid a Ming style isolation from global competition. One more mountain in Tibet makes no differenceTo be fair the west probably thought the same when they came to China for help in the 80s. They thought China would never be a real threat and now China might do what the USSR could never. crush the west using its own system against them. Something the USSR could never since they went for idealism over being pragmatic.
There is a difference though. The US had no issue trusting China since China just kept quiet and did it's job. The pressure from China would be one of the final blows to the USSR. Plus all that manufacturing kept the Capital holders from a profit line happy.
India on the other hand seems to be the opposite. Not only are they loudmouthed but they don't seem to contribute the value you expect given the large investments made. I can give money to a guy that insults me every second as long as he does the damn job properly in the end. I'm not giving it to a guy who does that but doesn't deliver but can give me a billion excuses for it. The only reason China is even at the table right now is because India is big so just maybe one day they might deliver something worthwhile simple coz of it size.
Since there are bigger fish to fry, there's no point wasting it excessively on India at the moment. But India is not entitled to anything from China either. They're the supapowah. They should figure it out themselves.
We all seen lord of the rings. Basically we have to accept Gollum (India) in to the party knowing he is not reliable and will probably betray us. In the end it was the right decision since Frodo failed at the last moment but Gollum was there to take the ring away, fall into the lava and destroy it (ironically it was his bad nature that allowed it to happen). But that's a fictional book in an ideal world not real life. Is it wise to gamble like this?
If India collapse then China share of power increases too. At least in BRICS China will not have to face India c*ckblocking. Also free the world from Hinduism may actually be a good thing.It's much more important to keep India powerful enough today that it doesn't get overwhelmed by the west and can increase trade within the global south. If India collapsed into civil war, the west's share of global power would increase.
There’s your error; the Indian elites lack strength of character hence their evident jealousy of China and desire to pull China down.Having said that, I much rather have an India that's growing economically as opposed to having an Indian economically retarded which will only be riped for more western influence and machinations.
A stronger India will at least be able to try and create its own pole that's wholly separate from China/Russia vs U.S. and it's vassals.
There’s your error; the Indian elites lack strength of character hence their evident jealousy of China and desire to pull China down.