Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Maybe, but I don't think Africans deserve to die in a nuclear winter just because the anglos and their "honorary aryans" types couldn't handle the idea of being N° 2.
Of course Africans dont deserve to die, but the reality is in life we offen dont end up with what we deserve.

To qualify my remarks, I made this comment in the context of responding to OP who stated that this is the first time in history a nuclear superpower (USA) was going to attempt to infringe upon and perhaps even take the core interest (Tiawan) of another nuclear superpower(China)

So the logic goes since the reigning supreme top hegemony (USA) already decided to make its first move (take TW by force and dare China to escalate) that when push comes to shove its somehow China's imperative or duty to back down "for the sake of all humanity"... in leui of nuclear WWIII...

Basically China and the rest of the world by extension should submit to being nuclear blackmailed by America because "think of humanity"...

A world like that would be worse than no world at all....

Whats the point of even having nukes if China doesnt actually plan to use it? So if not for Tiawan then what? Only when US boots have set boot into the forbidden city should China use nuclear retailation?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Of course Africans dont deserve to die, but the reality is in life we offen dont end up with what we deserve.

To qualify my remarks, I made this comment in the context of responding to OP who stated that this is the first time in history a nuclear superpower (USA) was going to attempt to infringe upon and perhaps even take the core interest (Tiawan) of another nuclear superpower(China)

So the logic goes since the reigning supreme top hegemony (USA) already decided to make its first move (take TW by force and dare China to escalate) that when push comes to shove its somehow China's imperative or duty to back down "for the sake of all humanity"... in leui of nuclear WWIII...

Basically China and the rest of the world by extension should submit to being nuclear blackmailed by America because "think of humanity"...

A world like that would be worse than no world at all....

Whats the point of even having nukes if China doesnt actually plan to use it? So if not for Tiawan then what? Only when US boots have set boot into the forbidden city should China use nuclear retailation?
Didn't you say you will ban yourself from this forum if china allows pelosi to land? How come you are still here and continuing with your over the top commentary? Maybe this is a hint that in the real world, people are a lot calmer than you?
 

Canton_pop

Junior Member
Registered Member
A bit of news:British,Canadian "trade"delegation plans to visit Taiwan.What the hell is going on??Mark my words it'll be like Korean War again 8-11 countries with US leading the pack of hyenas to attack China-hopefully China can incinerate most of them-cannot afford to lose-it'll be the end of the Chinese civilization
It's very obvious if you draw the race-line which race cannot afford to lose once their so called " yellow perils" adversaries become no.1 in the world
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Goodbye the median line: another day, another incursion of the median line - 25 of the 51 aircraft crossed the median line.


Distance between China and Taiwan's naval vessels:
At this rate those Perry class and La Fayette class will be driven into the ground from fatigue in no time. And if you don't send them out to shadow PLAN when they show up then you're going to get PLAN sailing right up to the coast and take photos for them to argue about "but muh PLA telephoto lens"
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top