Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.

efficient_kiwi

New Member
Registered Member
You should not base your responses/view of mainlanders based on this thread alone. There are a lot of passionate nationalist here.

It actually alarms me how many people on this thread are eager to have a war with Taiwanese brothers. The people that actually makes decisions are a lot more rational than that.

let's be clear about a few things:
1) Taiwan currently is functionally independent but not legally independent.
2) Mainland China can live with a functionally independent Taiwan as long as there is still hope of peaceful reunification at some point.
3) China cannot live with a Taiwan that gets too close to formal independence, because then achieving unification would be an invasion rather than concluding an unsettled civil war.
4) if Taiwanese people do not want a 1 country 2 party situation like the one that HK is in, then it can work with Western countries to negotiate a much better deal than the one HK ended up with. HK didn't have much of a choice, because it was supposed to return to China after 99 year lease. Also PLA, could have just easily took over HK without a fight. Taiwan is in a better position to negotiate for itself.
5) What Chinese government want is for Taiwan to be 100% aligned with it on geopolitical issues and allow it to use military bases. There are significant amount of freedom Taiwan can enjoy under that framework.
6) If US is unable to defend Taiwan from Chinese invasion (which is the case by all war gaming), then the smartest thing that Taiwanese government can do is to pursue unification under its terms.
7) The worst thing Taiwanese government can do is to drew the ire of China by pushing for greater international recognition.
8) While some Taiwanese people are tuned in with the reality of Taiwan's situation, I don't get the sense that's the case of the majority of Taiwan's population.
9) If Taiwanese people actually do realize the precariousness of their situation, then they should be demonstrating against DPP conducting its current policy seeking greater autonomy.
10) America is looking to defend Taiwan to maintain its hegemon position in Asia, not because it's looking out for Taiwan's interest. That's why when Hesper comes to Taiwan, he is asking how many Taiwanese people can suit up and die for the counter-PRC effort.

Keep in mind that while you are looking at things from a Taiwanese perspective, there are also wider issues at play. If we go by the theory that no Chinese government can allow a fully independent Taiwan that can pursue its own alliances and that US military will seek to defend Taiwan as the center part of its APAC hegemon policy.
1) China will be attacking Japan and US forces at the same time it attacks Taiwan
2) China is willing to live with full decoupling from Western countries and a 25 to 35% economic contraction to keep Taiwan from achieving legal independence.
3) A war between US and China will lead to world wide economic collapse. Japan and Taiwan will suffer the worst economic collapse of all the parties.
4) China will likely not attempt a buildup for landing of Taiwan until it completely defeats the American and Japanese forces pre-positioned in Asia. As such, Taiwan will have a month to figure out whether or not it wants to surrender and end the PLAN blockade in that case. A forced landing where both sides of strait suffer huge loss of lives should not need to happen.
5) The following war between US and China could lead to a nuclear standoff that would be catastrophic for humanity.

So given all of these problems, the best case scenario for everyone is for Western countries to help Taiwan negotiate the best term of "unification" as possible. Where Western countries can use the threat of full decoupling from China as a way to keep China from breaking its words and giving Taiwan the HK treatment.

I understand this is not a scenario that Western or Taiwanese politicians and public are willing to think about at the moment. But based on everything that different militaries have looked at, this is the reality of the situation. It would be the best if Taiwanese military is honest and tell Taiwanese public how hopeless their situation is and prepare Taiwanese people to take the least destructive option.

I hope I'm not too rough here on you. I'm just trying to be realistic. One of my best friends live in Taipei and I would urge him to get himself and his family out of Taiwan in the next few years in case things take a turn for the worst.

Thank you for your post. Yes, I am aware that this is not a representative sample of the Chinese people; thus, it was never my intention to engage in politics. I guess we all send the worst of us online, lol. I'm pretty ashamed of myself for letting things devolve. Just a few points, since I do agree with you mostly:

4) re: 1 country 2 systems, it's really hard to trust the CCP after seeing what happened to HK. The issue would be, ofc, how any agreement/promises is enforced in the future. Would the threat of decoupling be enough? The Chinese know that such a decoupling would also be disastrous for the West.

8) hmm, that's possible. Most people I know are attempting to get out either through school or work, so I may be just talking from the 同溫層.

I am not terribly familiar with how much the Chinese are willing to risk economically in terms of a Taiwan contingency. 25% to 35% of GDP is a steep, steep number.

The best case scenario is one where we are permanently allied with China in a possible great-power conflict with the US? To tell the truth, I cannot figure out how there is space under that framework for any Taiwanese liberty. We would be on the front lines in the new cold war, with likely several important bases situated along the eastern coast, with strategically important sectors like semi-conductors as well. Considering the extensive amount of surveillance and censoring right now in China, where the cold war hasn't quite hit its stride yet, it doesn't seem likely that we will enjoy any liberty under such a scenario. I could be wrong, I just don't see it.

Oh, you're definitely not too rough haha. I've read Patchwork's stuff, I know how bad the military options look for us.
 

efficient_kiwi

New Member
Registered Member
Taiwanese killed Vietnamese refugees and destroyed the evidence. Nobody saw jail time in the end.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What's your point? The current ROC government has done numerous bad things in the past, see 228, 白色恐怖 etc. They could be better about making things right, I guess, and that particular incident needed to be handled better. I think we still haven't apologized to this day. It's absolutely shameful imo.

I think the best case scenario is for KMT to win in 2024 and for China to pursue outreach into Taiwan and find certain messaging that will at least be palatable for Taiwanese public.

That would require the KMT to be actually good at politics, which is ... not the case. Ko would be a better option, the KMT is finished and carries around too much baggage to ever be effective again.
 

obj 705A

Junior Member
Registered Member
1) Taiwan currently is functionally independent but not legally independent.
That is like saying "my wife is cheating on me but we all pretend we don't know about it, so functionally she isn't my woman she is some other guy's woman, but legally she is my woman, so that's a good relationship".

2) Mainland China can live with a functionally independent Taiwan as long as there is still hope of peaceful reunification at some point.
Mainland China and Taiwan have been separated for like 70 years now and there are no signs of a soon to happen peaceful reunification, do you want to wait another 70 years to check whether it's possible or not! Especially since the majority of Taiwanese people don't seem to have an appetite for reunification after all these years of brainwashing the people of Taiwan.

4) if Taiwanese people do not want a 1 country 2 party situation like the one that HK is in, then it can work with Western countries to negotiate a much better deal than the one HK ended up with. HK didn't have much of a choice, because it was supposed to return to China after 99 year lease. Also PLA, could have just easily took over HK without a fight. Taiwan is in a better position to negotiate for itself.

The Taiwan issue is purely an internal Chinese issue, the only negotiations that should happen is between Beijing and Taipei. No western interference or mediation should be allowed, and any Taiwanese politicians who tries to have westerners "mediate" negotiations should be considered a traitor to the PRC and punished accordingly and buried to make an example out him/her so no one in the future even dares to bring in foreign imperialists to back him up during negotiations.

Beijing's issue is not with the Taiwanese people, it is with their government and part of the military, these Taiwanese politicians are not China's "brothers" they are traitors and they will taken out. After that the Taiwanese people will live in peace under the PRC's rule.
 

lcloo

Captain
But that should be the expectations. Taiwanese have lived independently of the mainland for 70 years. It's been almost 50 years since Chiang Kai Shek died. During this time, Taiwanese people have developed their own identity. It won't be easy to end that. But throughout Chinese history, it has lost certain part of its country and recovered them hundreds of years later.
To us ethnic Chinese in Malaysia, not knowing your ancestors is real shameful. Practically every etnic Chines Malaysians in Malaysia knows where our forefathers came from, from which province, which city/town or village, and some even right down to which streets. We are not Chinese citizens, but we respect our cutural roots and who our ancestors are.

By the way, my grand father came to Malaysia 110 years ago.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
That is like saying "my wife is cheating on me but we all pretend we don't know about it, so functionally she isn't my woman she is some other guy's woman, but legally she is my woman, so that's a good relationship".


Mainland China and Taiwan have been separated for like 70 years now and there are no signs of a soon to happen peaceful reunification, do you want to wait another 70 years to check whether it's possible or not! Especially since the majority of Taiwanese people don't seem to have an appetite for reunification after all these years of brainwashing the people of Taiwan.



The Taiwan issue is purely an internal Chinese issue, the only negotiations that should happen is between Beijing and Taipei. No western interference or mediation should be allowed, and any Taiwanese politicians who tries to have westerners "mediate" negotiations should be considered a traitor to the PRC and punished accordingly and buried to make an example out him/her so no one in the future even dares to bring in foreign imperialists to back him up during negotiations.

Beijing's issue is not with the Taiwanese people, it is with their government and part of the military, these Taiwanese politicians are not China's "brothers" they are traitors and they will taken out. After that the Taiwanese people will live in peace under the PRC's rule.
TW would have been reabsorbed long ago whether via AR or PR were it not for the US being world hegemony in a unipolar context and not to mention making Asia Pacific its "backyard"

This issue is really of US vs China, and given the historical context America has been involved in this civil war since before the very beginning and will likely see it to the end...

Plus if China successfully reclaims TW, then it breaks free of the 1st and 2nd island chain containment set by the US, eventually paving way for US to get kicked out of Asia Pacific, losing its hegemony and imploding as an overextended empire and collapsing as an overleveraged nation
One could say the TW issue is existential for the very survival of the Western race
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Thank you for your post. Yes, I am aware that this is not a representative sample of the Chinese people; thus, it was never my intention to engage in politics. I guess we all send the worst of us online, lol. I'm pretty ashamed of myself for letting things devolve. Just a few points, since I do agree with you mostly:

4) re: 1 country 2 systems, it's really hard to trust the CCP after seeing what happened to HK. The issue would be, ofc, how any agreement/promises is enforced in the future. Would the threat of decoupling be enough? The Chinese know that such a decoupling would also be disastrous for the West.

8) hmm, that's possible. Most people I know are attempting to get out either through school or work, so I may be just talking from the 同溫層.

I am not terribly familiar with how much the Chinese are willing to risk economically in terms of a Taiwan contingency. 25% to 35% of GDP is a steep, steep number.

Remember it's a 25-35% decline in GDP, which applies to both China and the USA.
Taiwan and Japan will fare even worse given their position.

The best case scenario is one where we are permanently allied with China in a possible great-power conflict with the US? To tell the truth, I cannot figure out how there is space under that framework for any Taiwanese liberty. We would be on the front lines in the new cold war, with likely several important bases situated along the eastern coast, with strategically important sectors like semi-conductors as well. Considering the extensive amount of surveillance and censoring right now in China, where the cold war hasn't quite hit its stride yet, it doesn't seem likely that we will enjoy any liberty under such a scenario. I could be wrong, I just don't see it.

Oh, you're definitely not too rough haha. I've read Patchwork's stuff, I know how bad the military options look for us.

If Taiwan is allied with China, then the US-China Cold War has been already won.

China would have a chokehold on critical semiconductors used by everyone.

Chinese military spending is currently focused on a Taiwan contingency, but afterwards, it will shift focus on building a blue-water Navy. Furthermore, Taiwan won't be part of the 1st Island Chain containment line. Chinese naval ships would sail straight through into the Pacific.

There would be a huge geopolitical realignment away from the USA and towards China - in Korea, Japan and SE Asia.

And in the longer-run, we can expect China to build a much larger Navy than the US.
Historically the world's largest trading nation builds the world's largest Navy to protect its global trade and investment interests.
And there is a good chance that China will become a high-income nation with 4x the population of the USA. That would imply an economy 4x larger and a significantly larger military.

---
And these are the same reasons why the US wants to keep Taiwan from allying with China.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
Remember it's a 25-35% decline in GDP, which applies to both China and the USA.
Taiwan and Japan will fare even worse given their position.



If Taiwan is allied with China, then the US-China Cold War has been already won.

China would have a chokehold on critical semiconductors used by everyone.

Chinese military spending is currently focused on a Taiwan contingency, but afterwards, it will shift focus on building a blue-water Navy. Furthermore, Taiwan won't be part of the 1st Island Chain containment line. Chinese naval ships would sail straight through into the Pacific.

There would be a huge geopolitical realignment away from the USA and towards China - in Korea, Japan and SE Asia.

And in the longer-run, we can expect China to build a much larger Navy than the US.
Historically the world's largest trading nation builds the world's largest Navy to protect its global trade and investment interests.
And there is a good chance that China will become a high-income nation with 4x the population of the USA. That would imply an economy 4x larger and a significantly larger military.
But have you factored in EROEI?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Thank you for your post. Yes, I am aware that this is not a representative sample of the Chinese people; thus, it was never my intention to engage in politics. I guess we all send the worst of us online, lol. I'm pretty ashamed of myself for letting things devolve. Just a few points, since I do agree with you mostly:

4) re: 1 country 2 systems, it's really hard to trust the CCP after seeing what happened to HK. The issue would be, ofc, how any agreement/promises is enforced in the future. Would the threat of decoupling be enough? The Chinese know that such a decoupling would also be disastrous for the West.
That's why Taiwanese government should seek to keep its own army in any unification agreement. If "unification" is inevitable, then the reasonable thing for any Taiwanese government to do is to explain that to its own citizens and then seek for the best deal it can. This is the most leverage Taiwan will get. Over the next 25 years, China will probably have 12 super carriers and be completely near peer with America in military power. The more the power shifts to China's side, the worse the deal will get for Taiwan. Any Taiwanese politician that truly cares about Taiwan autonomy should negotiate now than later.

The problem with HK unification is that British government had no leverage. DXP told Thatcher that China is not Argentina and will send troops across the water and take over HK in one day. After that, Thatcher shut up and the terms of agreement was formed. Does Taiwan want to wait until it's in British position back in the 80s?

8) hmm, that's possible. Most people I know are attempting to get out either through school or work, so I may be just talking from the 同溫層.
but that could be because you are well educated and have ways to get out. I've been to Taipei. It's not like HK or Singapore. It's more like Hangzhou in terms of being westernized. People don't speak English. Taipei is more like southern China than Shanghai. And that's the most KMT area of Taiwan. Do the working class and farmers that vote DPP really understand how stupid their policies are?

I am not terribly familiar with how much the Chinese are willing to risk economically in terms of a Taiwan contingency. 25% to 35% of GDP is a steep, steep number.

The best case scenario is one where we are permanently allied with China in a possible great-power conflict with the US? To tell the truth, I cannot figure out how there is space under that framework for any Taiwanese liberty. We would be on the front lines in the new cold war, with likely several important bases situated along the eastern coast, with strategically important sectors like semi-conductors as well. Considering the extensive amount of surveillance and censoring right now in China, where the cold war hasn't quite hit its stride yet, it doesn't seem likely that we will enjoy any liberty under such a scenario. I could be wrong, I just don't see it.

Oh, you're definitely not too rough haha. I've read Patchwork's stuff, I know how bad the military options look for us.
The biggest risk is not even the 25 to 35% economic contraction. The biggest risk is a nuclear showdown that destroys planet earth. a 30% contraction for China means that Chinese people go back to their life styles of 5 or 6 years ago. A war breaks out, Taiwan and Japan will suffer more than that. China will completely cut off oil, electricity, TV and Internet from Taiwan with a full blockade and Taiwan is not self sufficient in food. It's like the DPP government is completely oblivious about this threat and kidding itself. There is no scenario that ends well for Taiwan if they push too hard on this formal independence stuff.

The best case is not that bad for Taiwan. US power in Asia will be significantly degraded in the event that Taiwan and China achieves "unification". China will be pushing its power further into 2nd island chain. Taiwan will not be physically the front line of a great power struggle. China will dominate every modern industry and Taiwan will be a piece of that. Eventually, Japan and SK will have to join China's supply chain also. As for liberty, you will have a lot more liberty than people in mainland for sure. Again, the earlier that Taiwan negotiates with mainland, the better its deal will be.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
I have no idea. I've always envisioned a system where Taiwan can exist as it is with its own government and police force and maybe even armed forces, but that armed forces will be allied up with mainland. They will conduct joint defense of Taiwan/Mainland with PLA. Try to think about what is the easiest to stomach from Taiwanese point of view. They don't want to be ruled by an authoritarian government. So any peaceful unification with Taiwan has to give them more autonomy than HK ever got.
Peaceful reunification is impossible.

Can anyone name a single historical example where an unresolved civil war is concluded via peaceful voluntary annexation of one side? Some say German model, but that wasn't even a civil war, it was defeated, occupied, and involuntarily divided. There is no civil war has ever ended in peaceful voluntary annexation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top