East China Sea Air Defense ID Zone

Status
Not open for further replies.

SamuraiBlue

Captain
日本F-15闯东海识别区 两次试图抵近中国警巡飞机

中新社北京8月7日电(赵蔚 杨振) 中国空军新闻发言人申进科上校7日在北京表示,中国空军于8月6日组织东海防空识别区例行空中警巡,加强对防空识别区内空中目标的监控,维护东海有关空域飞行秩序和安全。

8月6日,多批日本航空自卫队飞机进入中国东海防空识别区长时间侦察活动,中国空军进行了必要的跟踪监视。日本F-15战斗机先后两次企图抵近中国警巡飞机,中国空军采取了合理、正当、克制的措施,应对了空中威胁。

申进科指出,中国划设东海防空识别区,是维护国家安全的防御性举措,是为了更好地维护东海上空航空器的正常飞行秩序,保证飞行安全。中国空军执行东海防空识别区空中警巡任务以来,对进入防空识别区的外国军机进行了监视掌握和识别判性,根据不同空中威胁采取相应措施,保卫了国家空防安全。(完)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Auto Translation:

Japanese F-15 identification zone twice tried to break arrived in the East China Sea near Chinese patrol aircraft

China news agency, Beijing, August 7 (Zhao Wei and Yang Zhen) - Chinese Air Force News spokesman Colonel Shen into the 7th Division, said in Beijing, China on August 6th Air Force organized air defense identification zone Tokai routine air patrol police, to strengthen the air defense identification Monitoring air target region, maintaining the East China Sea airspace order and safety.

August 6, several batches of the Japanese Air Self Defense Force aircraft entered the East China Sea air defense identification zone for a long time surveillance activities, the Chinese Air Force made the necessary tracking and monitoring. Japanese F-15 fighter jets attempted twice came close Chinese police patrol aircraft, the Chinese Air Force has taken reasonable and proper restraint measures to deal with the aerial threat.

Shen Jinke pointed out that China's air defense identification zone designation of the East China Sea, is to safeguard national security, defense initiatives, in order to better safeguard the normal order of the East China Sea over the flight of aircraft to ensure flight safety. Since the implementation of the East China Sea Chinese Air Force air defense identification zone air police patrol mission, entering the air defense identification zone monitoring foreign military aircraft were sentenced to between master and identify and take appropriate measures depending on the air threat, to defend the national air safety. (End)

This is only natural when there is an overlapping ADIZ it is hardly considered news.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
This is only natural when there is an overlapping ADIZ it is hardly considered news.

The danger is opposing air, sea, and in the future, space military hardware in the same area could lead to incidents with unintended consequences. >>>>> Removed inflammatory comments <<<<<
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
The danger is opposing air, sea, and in the future, space military hardware in the same area could lead to incidents with unintended consequences.

Stoneman, there is No One on the Sino Defense forum that I have more love or respect for, I write this because for you this is personal, and I really do respect your judgement. However as your friend, and more important than that, fellow patriot, I would implore you to withhold your condemnation of the Japanese of today, for the sins of the past, this is one of those situations where Solomon himself would withhold judgement, as my earliest posts warned, the imposition of this ADIZ just added fuel to the fire, I'm not judging either side, and both parties feel they have standing, but this has made each of our worlds a more dangerous place, for what, for a few islands that no one lives on??? There is NO doubt that the US is very concerned with the increased intrusions of both Chinese and Russian aircraft, as well the increased risk of "proximity, and the US has attempted to hold a moderating, neutral perspective, but that isn't always possible.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
The danger is opposing air, sea, and in the future, space military hardware in the same area could lead to incidents with unintended consequences. >>>>> Removed inflammatory comments <<<<<
Come on, Blackstone. You know those removed words were inflammatory, particularly when addressed to Samurai whom you know is Japanese.

Please stop pushing the envelope like this. You were already warned.
 

montyp165

Senior Member
Stoneman, there is No One on the Sino Defense forum that I have more love or respect for, I write this because for you this is personal, and I really do respect your judgement. However as your friend, and more important than that, fellow patriot, I would implore you to withhold your condemnation of the Japanese of today, for the sins of the past, this is one of those situations where Solomon himself would withhold judgement, as my earliest posts warned, the imposition of this ADIZ just added fuel to the fire, I'm not judging either side, and both parties feel they have standing, but this has made each of our worlds a more dangerous place, for what, for a few islands that no one lives on??? There is NO doubt that the US is very concerned with the increased intrusions of both Chinese and Russian aircraft, as well the increased risk of "proximity, and the US has attempted to hold a moderating, neutral perspective, but that isn't always possible.

Although a diplomatic solution would be best, I for one cannot say the US is either a neutral or impartial party given that it is trying to bolster Japan's position at both China and Russia's expense to ensure its dominance over any possible competitor, and given that the Japanese are acting as if there is nothing to dispute the declared ADIZ is a very necessary element on China's part to protect their claims. It's no less true with Russia and its disputes either for that matter. As for Japan the fact that the current government essentially sympathizes with the perpetrators of those past sins makes things all the more problematic.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Although a diplomatic outcome would be best, I for one cannot say the US is either a neutral or impartial party given that it is trying to bolster Japan's position at both China and Russia's expense to ensure its dominance over any possible competitor, and given that the Japanese are acting as if there is nothing to dispute the declared ADIZ is a very necessary element on China's part to protect their claims. It's no less true with Russia and its disputes either for that matter.
China has every right to create a ADIZ zone.

As does Japan, or any other nation.

On this thread we are separating the ADIZ zone from the islands in question because discussions about those islands invariably leads to flame bait and arguments, and high emotion between good SD members from both sides...which ultimately lead to members being suspended and threads being closed.

So, a word to all posters...

STAY ON TOPIC about the ADIZ. Do not attempt to make this thread a Diaoyu/Senkaku Island issue.
 

joshuatree

Captain
>>>>> Removed off topic portion about the islands. Stay on Topic! <<<<<

Although a diplomatic solution would be best, I for one cannot say the US is either a neutral or impartial party given that it is trying to bolster Japan's position at both China and Russia's expense to ensure its dominance over any possible competitor, and given that the Japanese are acting as if there is nothing to dispute the declared ADIZ is a very necessary element on China's part to protect their claims. It's no less true with Russia and its disputes either for that matter. As for Japan the fact that the current government essentially sympathizes with the perpetrators of those past sins makes things all the more problematic.

The US is not neutral or impartial. Otherwise, it would ask Japan to pull back it's ADIZ as well as other provocative moves in the same manner and tone to China.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GreatWall

New Member
Registered Member
nobody takes the Philippines seriously. they don't have anything to start a conflict even if they wanted to. they would say anything to support japan, it's just words and words don't cost them a bit. manila just want japan to quickly give them the 10 coast guard cutters that japan promised.

That is just being beyond ignorant. Equipment doesn't matter, it's the heart of the fighters that matter. The Chinese military know this better than anyone as they were once the nation without anything to start a conflict with and persevered.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
That is just being beyond ignorant. Equipment doesn't matter, it's the heart of the fighters that matter. The Chinese military know this better than anyone as they were once the nation without anything to start a conflict with and persevered.

Yeah, but all the heart in the world isn't going to make the Phillippines navy's ships any more effective against a potential enemy who has individual destroyer flotillas that is many times more capable than the entire PN fleet.


If this relationship was not a naval one but a ground insurgency where a technologically weaker foe could use asymmetry and attrition more to their advantage, then tactics could be used to level the playing field.
It's like saying the DPRK navy can take on the USN as long as they have "heart". Come on.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Yeah, but all the heart in the world isn't going to make the Phillippines navy's ships any more effective against a potential enemy who has individual destroyer flotillas that is many times more capable than the entire PN fleet.


If this relationship was not a naval one but a ground insurgency where a technologically weaker foe could use asymmetry and attrition more to their advantage, then tactics could be used to level the playing field.
It's like saying the DPRK navy can take on the USN as long as they have "heart". Come on.

Exactly, heart doesn't do you much good at all if you haven't got any weapons you can use to pose much, if any, threat to your opponent.

No one doubts the likes of Hamas or ISIS doesn't have 'heart', but no amount of heart is going to allow them to bring down F15/16/18s or pose much of a threat to Israeli or US navy warships if they haven't got any long range SAMs or AShMs. If you haven't got the bare minimum level of equipment required, forget about different leagues, you are not even playing the same game.

Why do you think China waited so long before setting up its AIDZ?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top