It would be interesting to read this article from Digitimes.
Thanks a ton! Actually it does bring a different (and a little more detailed compared to other sites) insight into the Chinese Semiconductor Industry. Digitimes have been in the Semiconductor firm research for a very long time now so their insight does not hurt to look at
China-based semiconductor equipment suppliers continue to see explosive growth
Jingyue Hsiao, DIGITIMES Asia, TaipeiMonday 6 May 2024
Credit: AFP
Amid the indigenization efforts, China-based semiconductor equipment makers continued to witness explosive growth over the past year, as most companies reported double-digit growth in sales and profits.
Amid the indigenization efforts, China-based semiconductor equipment makers continued to witness explosive growth over the past year, as most companies reported double-digit growth in sales and profits.
In the latest financial report, Naura Technology had a whopping 50% increase in sales and a significant 65% boost in profits last year. Zhejiang JIngsheng Mechanical and Electrical also had a remarkable performance, with nearly a 70% surge in sales and close to a 60% rise in profits. Similarly, AMEC saw strong growth in both sales and profits, hitting double-digit figures during the same timeframe.
Naura Technology highlighted in its annual report that recent years have witnessed a surge in demand for ICs due to the rapid advancement of technologies like AI, 5G, and IoT. The recovery in the latter half of 2023 saw an uptick in sales for end products such as smartphones and PCs. Additionally, the ongoing construction of AI infrastructure has fueled further demand for hardware in the market.
Naura Technology said that the semiconductor industry in China hit a record high in 2023. Based on SEMI data, semiconductor equipment sales in China surged to US$34.2 billion, an 8% increase from the previous year and capturing a global market share of 30.3%. This underscores China's importance in the global integrated circuit equipment market and demonstrates the robust demand for such equipment within the Chinese market.
In its annual report, AMEC announced a notable surge in market shares for CCP and ICP etching systems. The company attributed this growth to its diverse portfolio, ongoing advancements in key technologies, swift product iterations, and extensive coverage of etching equipment.
Naura Technology highlighted several risk factors in its report, including the downturn in the semiconductor market, potential overseas supply disruptions, a slowdown in domestic demand for semiconductor equipment, slower-than-expected progress in high-end equipment R&D, and escalating industry competition.
In the near future, domestic demand in China is projected to continue supporting the operations of semiconductor equipment suppliers based in the country. This comes amid reports from Bloomberg suggesting that Japan is exploring the possibility of expanding export restrictions on four technologies linked to semiconductors or quantum computing.
Meanwhile, semiconductor equipment suppliers outside China still rely on the market for growth. According to ASML's latest financial results, China accounted for nearly half of the company's revenue in the first quarter of 2024, as its customers in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan reduced procurement amid an industrial downturn.
Source: Bloomberg, May 2024
China-based semiconductor supplier financial summary (CNYm) 2021 2022 2023 Supplier Profit Sales Profit Sales Profit Sales Naura Technology 1,077.4 9,683.5 2,352.7 14,688.1 3,899.1 22,079.5 Zhejiang Jingsheng Mechanical & Electrical 1,711.7 5,961.4 2,924.4 10,638.3 4,557.5 17,983.2 AMEC 1,011.4 3,108.1 1,169.8 4,739.8 1,785.9 6,263.5 ACM Research Shanghai 266.2 1,620.9 668.5 2,873.0 910.5 3,888.3 Piotech 68.5 758.0 368.5 1,705.6 662.6 2,705.0 Hwatsing Technology 198.3 804.9 501.6 1,648.8 723.7 2,508.0 Hangzhou Chang Chuan Technology 218.2 1,511.2 461.1 2,576.5 45.2 1,775.1 Kingsemi 77.3 828.7 200.2 1,384.9 250.6 1,717.0 Xinyichang Technology 232.0 1,196.6 204.7 1,183.7 60.3 1,040.2 Skyverse Technology 53.4 360.6 11.7 509.2 140.3 890.9 Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology 438.8 878.3 526.3 1,070.6 251.7 690.9
Article you requested @Wahid145
If anyone needs anything paywalled including Digitimes tag me. I have access to a lot of paywalled content through my work.
Personally I don't see a lot of value in these three Digitimes articles. They're largely just rehashing existing numbers seen in other reports.
That probably depends if domestic chip making equipment is supply or demand restrained. I would bet that everyone is on expansion mode and the only limiting factor is time for all these expansion projects to be finished.And they should phase in some kind of tariffs on chipmaking equipment also, since that will further improve economics of domestic SMEs
Ya, this would be another article to look at when you have time @curiouscat
It would be interesting to read this article from Digitimes.
Tariffs on analog chips and gas cars would be more damaging than equipment. Putting higher tariffs on US gas cars will push Chinese consumers into buying more cheaper EVs.That probably depends if domestic chip making equipment is supply or demand restrained. I would bet that everyone is on expansion mode and the only limiting factor is time for all these expansion projects to be finished.
If that's the case, any extra tariffs is just extra cost passed to the domestic customer since domestic chip company can't properly provide the supply volume to compete with the higher cost external competitor's products
I guess your "phase in" is to account for this exact scenario. Maybe a deadline based sanction where it says that start of 2025 sanctions of x% are imposed, then start of 2026 3x%, 2027 6x% and so on. That would be a solid signaling to domestic chip making companies to frantically expand as much as possible.
Ideally at a later stage there can be some sort of deal cut so that these sanctions are then lowered to ensure that domestic companies have sufficient market pressure to keep innovating
Would love to see the Tariffs on the Analog Chips. Still can't believe Broadcom and TI have such huge revenue when there are Chinese equivalent in those frontsTariffs on analog chips and gas cars would be more damaging than equipment. Putting higher tariffs on US gas cars will push Chinese consumers into buying more cheaper EVs.
If they are good for Huawei they are good for everyone else.Would love to see the Tariffs on the Analog Chips. Still can't believe Broadcom and TI have such huge revenue when there are Chinese equivalent in those fronts
as far as I can glean, America just imposed a 50% tariff on Chinese chips.
This is quite interesting, because I think a counter tariff on American chips and possibly chipmaking equipment is certainly in order.
Especially for analog, control, auto and power chips that TI, Onsemi and analog device would sell to China, a 50% tariff on that would make them entirely uncompetitive in Chinese market.
Similarly, a 50% tariff on Micron memory chips would make it entirely uncompetitive vs SK and Samsung DRAMs/Nand
And they should phase in some kind of tariffs on chipmaking equipment also, since that will further improve economics of domestic SMEs