Chinese Economics Thread

proelite

Junior Member
Ye, looking at the old years it looks like deflation sucks I remember 2015, and the economy sucked that year


GXDaPysW8AE1Nkd

So this graph is telling me we're at the end of a 25-year-old cycle.
 

abenomics12345

Junior Member
Registered Member
So this graph is telling me we're at the end of a 25-year-old cycle.

Coincidentally, real estate market was formally liberalized in 1998:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It is instrumental to read what happened to the financial system in 1998 and how massive of a fiscal package was done to resolve the non performing loans in the banking system:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ergo, sitting on hands while doing nothing today, while facing the continued real estate market implosion, is not going to cut it.

The longer this drags on the bigger the package is necessary.

None of these issues, by the way, are in anyway contradictory to the highly successful "Industrial Upgrade Theme" that takes up 99% of the mindshare of people in this thread.
 

proelite

Junior Member
Coincidentally, real estate market was formally liberalized in 1998:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It is instrumental to read what happened to the financial system in 1998 and how massive of a fiscal package was done to resolve the non performing loans in the banking system:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ergo, sitting on hands while doing nothing today, while facing the continued real estate market implosion, is not going to cut it.

The longer this drags on the bigger the package is necessary.

None of these issues, by the way, are in anyway contradictory to the highly successful "Industrial Upgrade Theme" that takes up 99% of the mindshare of people in this thread.

Perhaps the leaders are waiting for the right timing and conditions to generate a multiplier effect on momentum.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
Coincidentally, real estate market was formally liberalized in 1998:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It is instrumental to read what happened to the financial system in 1998 and how massive of a fiscal package was done to resolve the non performing loans in the banking system:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ergo, sitting on hands while doing nothing today, while facing the continued real estate market implosion, is not going to cut it.

The longer this drags on the bigger the package is necessary.

None of these issues, by the way, are in anyway contradictory to the highly successful "Industrial Upgrade Theme" that takes up 99% of the mindshare of people in this thread.

Any "huge" package gets us back into the imbalance that was created after 2008.

The dividends from the industrial investment in the past five years have not kicked in yet and the costs from a big real estate bubble burst had been contained pretty well and at any rate those costs are rapidly receding as the bubble unwinds.

China electricity usage increased 7% last year and is on track to grow 8% growth this year. What failing economy grows 7+% two years in row?

In 2009, the US undergoing a similar RE bubble burst had electricity usage fall 4%. That is not happening to China's economy.

Pour that money into science, technology and industry. We know the embargoes and bans will come and those are hard assets that will power the economy forward.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
A + H + ADR, as clearly stated in Exhibit 5

Hey @doggydogdo & @Michaelsinodef is this rEtIrEmEnT driven too?

Cycles don't happen themselves - look at TSF growth in 2015 vs 2016 and 2020 vs 2021
When have I ever said that it was ALL retirement driven?

Don't fucking go strawmanning.

Ps. I remember pretty clearly that you said it wasn't really worth posting on this forum and that you would stop, why ya back?
 

abenomics12345

Junior Member
Registered Member
Perhaps the leaders are waiting for the right timing and conditions to generate a multiplier effect on momentum.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The paywall bypass doesn't work for me, but I would expect moves 2H of this year.

The dividends from the industrial investment in the past five years have not kicked in yet and the costs from a big real estate bubble burst had been contained pretty well and at any rate those costs are rapidly receding as the bubble unwinds.

China electricity usage increased 7% last year and is on track to grow 8% growth this year. What failing economy grows 7+% two years in row?

This is precisely the problem - people are working the longest hours ever in China, companies are making more 'stuff', yet are selling them cheaper than before: Price is down, Quantity is up, net/net revenues are flat.

Very much "再苦苦百姓“ vibes - which is why people aren't happy.
Any "huge" package gets us back into the imbalance that was created after 2008.

As I've made abundantly clear before, nobody is suggesting that they do Shantytown 2.0.

The place where the fiscal package goes to is extremely important - it has to be directed to social welfare so people feel like they are getting fruits from their hard work.

When have I ever said that it was ALL retirement driven?

When you refused to acknowledge employment weakness in Beijing is due to economic weakness.

Ps. I remember pretty clearly that you said it wasn't really worth posting on this forum and that you would stop, why ya back?

I changed my mind and thought I'd do some more public education for you.

Also, I'm in agreement with Glenn here as well

1725916735751.png
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
China doesn't want the a bubble prone real state market to be a unproductive driver of the Chinese economy, also there is the issue of the future, home prices should be driven by supply and demand no by speculation if a country wants a future, if house are not affordable for young people they will not want to deal with the expenses of a child.

So China need to be prepare in case interest rates fall and speculative money start pouring again into the market, if prices are high and interest rates go down is over, speculative money will flood the market.

The US is in a pretty bad situation because of this, the housing market need to crash before interest rates go down to houses be affordable again. But it can't because the housing supply is pretty low. The FED is trapped between a rock and hard place, if interest rates go down now it could be that people in the US will be living in expensive tents in the near future.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Top