China won Turkey's missile defense competition

chuck731

Banned Idiot
Re: New Chinese Military Developments

Integrating the HQ-9, which is a very good system, with Turkey's other AWAACS and AEW assets is going to be difficult. No way will they allow Chinese techs access to those systems for obvious reasons, and any effort to do so, no matter by who, either way, on the Chinese side or the west, will be nit be welcome because of the info about those systems which could easily flow either wy.

And not being integrated into those other assets would be a weakness in the overall system.

It will be interesting to see how they go about it.


Integration is a matter of interface protocol. Get the right protocol, and system will work together to high degree, irrespective of what internal secrets either side is keeping from the other. In the past China has largely followed western interface architecture and protocols in developing its domestic military equipment. Chinese designed equipment are probably be more readily compatible right out of the box with more western systems than might be expected.

It is probably easier for the Turkish to integrate HQ-9 into a western system it it was, for example, for Greece to integrate S-300 into NATO. Given the fact that no one raised a stink about compatibility when Greece purchased S-300, I think it is clear the hue and cry about integration that is being raised now about the HQ-9 is largly balony thrown out in a last ditch effort to reverse an unfavorable decision.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: New Chinese Military Developments

Integration is a matter of interface protocol. I think it is clear the hue and cry about integration that is being raised now about the HQ-9 is largly balony thrown out in a last ditch effort to reverse an unfavorable decision.
There is more to it than just any kind of COTS interface protocols. The data link interfaces are highly secure and highly compartmentalized and highly guarded. Interfacing to them such that identification, targeting and launch and update data flows seamlessly is not a trivial or straight forward proposition nor should or could it be.

It will involve getting into the nuts and bolts internals of those systems.

As I said, it will be interesting to see how they go about it...though I expect not many details will be provided. And that's not balonely.
 

shen

Senior Member
Turkey should just ask their fellow NATO member Greece how they operate their S-300PMU-1 and TOR batteries :D

according to Greek member of the Key forum, they solved the interoperability problem by installing a "translator" between the Russian and NATO interface, while preserving the classified area of both sides.

It is mainly a question of trust, apparently both the Russian and NATO trust Greece to keep their secrets from the other side. Does NATO trust Turkey?
 

chuck731

Banned Idiot
Turkey should just ask their fellow NATO member Greece how they operate their S-300PMU-1 and TOR batteries :D

according to Greek member of the Key forum, they solved the interoperability problem by installing a "translator" between the Russian and NATO interface, while preserving the classified area of both sides.

It is mainly a question of trust, apparently both the Russian and NATO trust Greece to keep their secrets from the other side. Does NATO trust Turkey?

Of course Europe would trust Turkey less than Greece, that's why Greece is an EU member and part of the Eurozone while Turkey is not, eventhough the Eurozone would likely be better off today if the reverse was true.
 

shen

Senior Member
The Greek example shows that the so-called interoperability problem is not necessarily a technical problem but rather a political problem.
Turkey is not without bargaining chips. Vital parts of NATO early warning network are located on Turkish territory. The new large radar site at Malatya Turkey for example is provides of early warning of Iranian ballistic missile launch. Without Turkish cooperation, the entire NATO missile defense plan for Europe is doomed. Now why should Turkey play ball if NATO wouldn't reciprocate?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Of course Europe would trust Turkey less than Greece, that's why Greece is an EU member and part of the Eurozone while Turkey is not, eventhough the Eurozone would likely be better off today if the reverse was true.

What are you talking about?!

EU membership has nothing to do with 'trust'. Greece is a member and Turkey is not primarily because of the different size of their respective economies and populations. A secondary concern is Turkey's human rights record, but 'trust' has never ever been a matter of concern. I

If Turkish 'trustworthiness' was ever in doubt, Turkey would not be a key NATO member or would the US be pushing for Turkey to buy advanced US made weapons now would it?

Talk about weather the EU economy would be better off with Turkey as part of the EU is also very much a matter of prospective.

On the one hand, adding Turkish GDP and market to the EU would undoubtably boost the EU's economic indicators and stimulate additional demand. OTOH, the free movement of Turkish citizens across other EU countries looking for jobs and cheap Turkish goods being given free access to the EU internal market could be bad for many regional economies, and the huge numbers of Turkish farmers, businesses etc eligible for EU grants and subsidies would also create a massive additional burden for the richer net contributor countries.

There are merits and drawbacks and it is the subject of complex and heated debate amongst economists and sociologists and is not a simple question or have a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer, but alas this is all rather off topic.
 

chuck731

Banned Idiot
What are you talking about?!

EU membership has nothing to do with 'trust'. Greece is a member and Turkey is not primarily because of the different size of their respective economies and populations. A secondary concern is Turkey's human rights record, but 'trust' has never ever been a matter of concern. I

If Turkish 'trustworthiness' was ever in doubt, Turkey would not be a key NATO member or would the US be pushing for Turkey to buy advanced US made weapons now would it?

Talk about weather the EU economy would be better off with Turkey as part of the EU is also very much a matter of prospective.

On the one hand, adding Turkish GDP and market to the EU would undoubtably boost the EU's economic indicators and stimulate additional demand. OTOH, the free movement of Turkish citizens across other EU countries looking for jobs and cheap Turkish goods being given free access to the EU internal market could be bad for many regional economies, and the huge numbers of Turkish farmers, businesses etc eligible for EU grants and subsidies would also create a massive additional burden for the richer net contributor countries.

There are merits and drawbacks and it is the subject of complex and heated debate amongst economists and sociologists and is not a simple question or have a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer, but alas this is all rather off topic.


Turkey is being excluded from the European Union largely on the strength of the view that Turkey is not European, Turkey could not be trusted to act to further European interests and values once it has gained access to the EU, and including Turkey, whose population would surpass those of Germany by 2020 and whose influence would therefore be considerable in the EU, would threaten the preeminance of European values in the European Union.

Turkish economy is 5 times the size of Greek economy. Turkish population is nearly the same as that of Germany, the most populous nation in the EU and Eurozone. Turkish budget deficit and national debt is a fraction of those of Greece. Turkish economy has been and is expected to continue to be by far the fastest growing major economy in the greater European region. Turkish economic growth between 2008 and 2020 is expected to be equal to about third to half of the total economic growth to be expected from the entire Eurozone. It would be a pretty perverse perspective that would see inclusion of Turkish economy into the EU and Eurozone as something other than a major net benefit for those regions, or that the inclusion of debt laden and stagnant Greek economy into the Eurozone has not been a unmitigated financial and economic calamity for the entire Eurozone. You need to read the news every now and then. Clearly, the perception that Turkey is non-European and can not be trusted to act European is strong enough for the EU and Eurozone to forgo a third to a half of its own economic growth.

As to inclusion of Turkey in the NATO, that was an American project and motivated by Turkey's status as a front line state during the Cold war. Hardly is it indication of trust in the Europeanness of Turkey. It was an indication that Turkey can be trusted to not want to be communist, was positioned to threaten economically vital Ukraine and Caucasus areas of the Soviet Union, and was therefore useful to the containment of the Soviet Union.

The irony of the situation is the democratically elected, Islamist government currently in Turkey has been used as an argument to support the non-Europeaness of Turkey. But this Islamist government only gained power in Turkey because the EU has made the neuturing of the formerly powerful Kamalist military establishment, which had frequently launched coups to depose governments that was not in its judgement sufficiently wester oriented, a criteria for considering Turkish membership. Yet the Kamalist military establishment in Turkey had been the most European oriented, western looking, socially progressive power centers in Turkey to start with.
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Come on guys get please back to the subject. Chuck is also right there is certain amount of racism that color the relationship between Turkey and Europe.

Turkey feel spurned and rejected by the European and that will cause slow reorientation of Turkish politic . Turkey would be a natural leader for all the stans . They all speak one form or another Turkish languages. And now all the Stans are prospering from trade with China . So it is natural that Turkey want to join SCO . Anyway irrespective of China realizing the sale of HQ9 or not a milestone has been reached. China is now graduated to be first class supplier of Defense system. And word of defiance from vice premiere Here is the article

By David Lague
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Turkey's $4 billion order for a Chinese missile defense system is a breakthrough for China in its bid to become a supplier of advanced weapons, even though opposition from Washington and NATO threatens to derail the deal.

The winning bid from the China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corp (CPMIEC) to deliver its FD-2000 air defense missile system in a joint production agreement with Turkey is the first time a Chinese supplier has won a major order for state-of-the-art equipment from a NATO member. U.S., Russian and Western European manufacturers were also in the fray.

The decision last week to award the contract to CPMIEC, a company that is under U.S. sanctions for dealings with Iran, North Korea and Syria, surprised global arms trade experts and senior NATO officials.

"It is quite significant I would say, if it materializes," said Oliver Brauner, a researcher on China's arms exports at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)."It would certainly be a landmark deal."

Turkey signaled on Monday that it could back away from its decision after Washington said it had "serious concerns" about the deal with a sanctioned company for a system that would not be compatible with NATO's other weapons and networks.

And, in a reminder that Ankara faces stiff opposition from its alliance partners in Europe, a NATO official in Brussels said it was important that equipment ordered by member countries is compatible.

"It is premature at this stage to say whether Turkey's acquisition will be able to operate with the NATO Integrated Air and Missile Defence System," the official said.

NATO's disappointment with Turkey is heightened by the fact that the United States, Germany and the Netherlands each sent two Patriot batteries earlier this year after Ankara asked for help in beefing up its air defenses against the threat of missiles from Syria.

Ankara could call off the air defense deal under pressure, but some Chinese and foreign commentators suggested it would still be a symbolic victory for Beijing.

They say Turkey's willingness to choose the FD-2000 over established rivals confirms the rapid technical improvement and competitiveness of China's missile and aerospace sector.

Chinese military experts say the system performed well in live tests for the Turkish Defence Ministry.

It also signals that China's sprawling defense industry is poised to become a low cost supplier of high technology weaponry alongside its rapidly expanding sales of basic military equipment including small arms, artillery, armored vehicles, general purpose vehicles and older generation missiles.


CHINESE MILITARY EXPORTS SOARING

China has displaced the United Kingdom as the world's fifth biggest arms supplier in the five years to 2012, according to SIPRI.

Chinese exports of conventional weapons increased 162 per cent in the five years from 2008 to 2012 compared with the five years from 2003 to 2007, the arms trade monitor reported earlier this year.

Sales to close ally Pakistan accounted for most of this but China is also expanding its deliveries to other markets, mostly in the developing world.

While almost three decades of double digit, annual increases in military spending has accelerated Beijing's ambitious military build-up, it has also allowed China's defense factories to boost the quality and performance of home-grown weapons and military hardware.

"There are good reasons for China to succeed in Turkey," says Vasily Kashin, an arms trade expert at Moscow's Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. "The key factors were price and the readiness to transfer technology."

CPMIEC, the marketing arm of China's missile manufacturing industry, outbid the Franco-Italian company Eurosam and its SAMP/T Aster 30 missile, Russia's Rosoboronexport's S-300 and Patriot air defense batteries from U.S. contractors Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.

Atilla Sandikli, the chairman of think-tank Bilgesam and a former high-level officer in the Turkish army, said an offer of technology transfer from China was decisive.

Turkey's NATO allies were less enthusiastic about co-production and technology sharing, he added.

"The only reason why Turkey didn't have them (the air defense systems) until now is because they wanted to achieve the technological information and know-how to produce these systems," Sandikli said."I think Turkey's choice is a message to its NATO allies in this sense."

Some analysts said Turkey's decision also reflected warming ties between Ankara and Beijing in recent years and a growing track record of defense cooperation.

Nihat Ali Ozcan, an analyst at Ankara-based think-tank TEPAV, said that Turkey and China already were in cooperation on short-range missile defense systems.

"Co-producing these systems also requires technology transfer, and China has no restrictions on it," he said.


Reports in China's state-run military press suggested the sale would open the door to further high technology orders in the West and other markets. Chinese military experts were quoted as saying that while price had been a key factor, the capability of the FD-2000 system also satisfied Turkey's demands.

China has been aggressively marketing this air defense system at arms exhibitions and air shows in recent years.

Military analysts familiar with the FD-2000 say it is a leading example of Chinese defense industry's capacity to absorb and adapt foreign technology, combine this with local innovation and ramp up low cost manufacturing.

Kashin said the Chinese missile system was partly based on Western technology obtained from Israel and also drew on Russian know-how.

It was possible that Russia supplied some of the components and technology under contracts with China, he said.

According to marketing material for the FD-2000 and reports in the Chinese military press, the missiles, launchers, radars, vehicles and support systems of the mobile FD-2000 are all designed and built in China.

It is reported to be effective in intercepting high performance strike aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), precision guided bombs and a range of missiles. It is also advertised that it remains effective during heavy air strikes and electronic interference.

(Additional reporting by Tulay Karadeniz in Ankara, Ece Toksabay and Can Sezer in Istanbul and Adrian Croft in Brussels; editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)



Turkey defend choice of Chinese defense system, says interests matter
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1 October 2013 /TODAY'S ZAMAN WITH WIRES, ANKARA
Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç has defended NATO member Turkey's selection of a Chinese missile system for its long-term, long-range missile and aerial defense program, code-named T-Loramids -- a move that has angered the US -- saying Turkey's interests are a priority and that it is not right for other countries to have a say in the matter.

Speaking after the Cabinet meeting on Monday, Arınç underlined that some issues -- referring to Turkey's NATO membership and its selection of a Chinese firm -- should not be mixed and that the Turkish government only thinks about Turkey's interests.

“We do not consider anything other than Turkey's interests. The US authorities have already voiced their respectful remarks," Arınç said, adding that the US made no accusations against Turkey over its choice.

The Turkish Defense Industry Implementation Committee (SSİK) announced the decision that the contract to co-produce a long-range air and missile defense system worth $4 billion would be awarded to the Chinese firm China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corp (CPMIEC) in a statement on Thursday, rejecting rival bids from Russian, US and European firms. CPMIEC was sanctioned by the United States in February for violations of the Iran, North Korea and Syria Nonproliferation Act.

Washington said on Saturday it had expressed serious concerns to Turkey over its decision to co-produce a long-range air and missile defense system with a Chinese firm under US sanctions.

Jen Psaki, US State Department spokeswoman, said the United States has made its concerns clear to Turkey at a high level.

"We have conveyed our serious concerns about the Turkish government's contract discussions with the US-sanctioned company for a missile defense system that will not be inter-operable with NATO systems or collective defense capabilities," Psaki said at a daily briefing for reporters. "Our discussions will continue."

Psaki said the United States had taken note of comments by Turkey that the deal was not yet final. If a deal was finalized "then we will talk about that at that point," she added.

US Ambassador to Turkey Francis J. Ricciardone said that as Turkey is a NATO ally, when the US sees the need for Turkey's defense, it will act as an ally. "We are going to do that for as long as we are allies. We hope you will choose a NATO compatible system so that you will have the best air defense system in the world,” he said, addressing Turkey.

Arınç noted that Turkey has been preparing for the tender for years and many countries' firms working in the defense industry had participated in the tender.

The main competitors for the tender were the Patriot missile long-range air defense system, produced by US partners Raytheon and Lockheed Martin; Russia's Rosoboronexport with its S-400 system; China's HQ9, exported as the FD-2000; and the Italian-French Eurosam and its SAMP/T Aster 30.

China's bid was the lowest, less than $3 billion. Arınç added that the main reason why Turkey had chosen the Chinese bidder was because it offered the lowest price and they reached an agreement to co-produce the missile systems in Turkey.

“It is not possible for another country to say, 'I have a problem with them. I put them on a black list or a red list, so how could you give them a tender?'” Arınç said, adding that when considering Turkey's interests, the Turkish government did not hesitate to choose the Chinese firm.

“We are a member of NATO and we have had good relations from the beginning with NATO countries, especially the United States. However, when it comes to the subject of defending Turkey … we have the power to make a decision without looking to anyone else," Arınç said.


Turkey has decided to start contract negotiations with CPMIEC on its six-year project to acquire long-range missile and air defense systems.

CPMIEC does not make missiles itself. The two main manufacturers are China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp (CASC) and China Aerospace Science and Industry Corp (CASIC). CASC makes intercontinental ballistic missiles, while CASIC focuses on short- and intermediate-range rockets.

The project is intended to bridge Turkey's gap in missile defense. Turkey opened a contract in March 2007 for the acquisition of long-range missiles, at the time citing, though implicitly, an effort to deter a possible threat from neighboring Iran.

Arınç said while the deal had not yet been completed, the initial selection had been based on the Chinese offer being the most economical and because some of the production would be carried out in conjunction with Turkey.

“Once the process is over, the production would start,” he added.

President Abdullah Gül also stated that though Turkey is a NATO member state, after looking at the conditions, the purchase would be definite.

Turkey has for long been purchasing its military hardware and other equipment from the US, Germany and its other Western allies as part of a policy of integrating its weapons systems with NATO military equipment.

With the second-largest deployable military force in the NATO alliance, Turkey has no long-range missile defense system of its own, though NATO deployed the US-built Patriot air and missile defense system in Turkey in 2012.
 
Last edited:

shen

Senior Member
apparently Turkey doesn't need NATO help. Turks are going to integrate it themselves.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Chinese missiles to be NATO operable: Turkey

Burak Bekdil ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News
Turkish officials provide reassurances that a new Chinese-designed missile defense system worth $3.44 billion will integrate into the alliance’s system

A controversial air and missile defense system Turkey intends to buy from a Chinese manufacturer will be automatically integrated with NATO assets stationed in Turkey, the country’s top defense procurement official has revealed in an effort to allay concerns about the recent purchase.

Murad Bayar, head of the Undersecretariat for Defense Procurement, told the Hürriyet Daily News that full integration with NATO assets was an explicit condition in the contract for the planned air defense system.

“As part of this program, a Turkish defense company will be tasked with integrating the air defense system into a network operated by the Turkish Air Force. That integration will mean integration with NATO assets, too, since the Turkish system is fully integrated with the NATO system,” Bayar said.

Bayar said the much-debated Chinese bid from China Precision Machinery Export-Import Corp. (CPMIEC), which won the tender Sept. 26, came in at $3.44 billion; the initial contract price was estimated at $4 billion.

Turkish Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz announced after a top defense industry meeting Sept. 26 that a contract for the construction of long-range air and anti-missile system was awarded to China Precision Machinery Export-Import Corp. (CPMIEC).

The Chinese contender defeated a U.S. partnership of Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, offering the Patriot air defense system; Russia’s Rosoboronexport, marketing the S-300; and the Italian-French consortium Eurosam, maker of the SAMP/T Aster 30.

Under the program, dubbed T-LORAMIDS, Turkey will start contract negotiations with CPMIEC, the front-runner of the competition and, if these talked failed, with the Eurosam consortium, the second best offer according to a grading of bids, according to Bayar. The U.S. Patriot system was ranked third. Bayar said the Russian option had been eliminated entirely.

October/03/2013
 

weig2000

Captain
Some more details on the testing performance of the competing systems.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



"Bayar said a delegation of Turkish industry and air force officials had witnessed test launches from all the firms but that the Chinese had allowed Turkey to pick its own scenario and offered it a tailored demonstration.

"We said we want this kind of a launch, and our delegation watched the launches as if they were the operators. These were real launches," Bayar said."
 
Top