View attachment 142111
From the same article, this part on the PLAAF’s thoughts on the CCA matches everything I have been saying about the proper role of drones in a high end 6th gen fight.
DeepL translation with my edit:
< From the above, we have answered the question of why our "Strong Military Wingman" (Guancha’s nickname for PLA CCA) is a high-end aircraft that is different from the enemy's "Loyal Wingman" concept from the very beginning, in terms of the common subsystems within the system and how to accomplish the mission in the face of a strong enemy. The core advantage of the "Strong Wingman" is that it enables worry-free maneuvering in air combat by omitting the pilot and his/her supporting systems, and eliminates the impact of human error on mission accomplishment,
while "cheapness for the sake of cheapness" such as reducing specifications should not be a distraction in the development process. With this core principle in mind, the two major R&D bases of China's aviation industry for fighter jets actually have a technological foundation accumulated since the beginning of this century, which is sufficient to be transformed into a "strong military wingman": the Dark Sword high-mobility UAV, which made its debut at the Zhuhai Airshow in 2006, and research on countering the HiMAT high maneuverability UAV from Rockwell; there is also the fifth-generation light fighter program competition, which adopts a single engine configuration similar to the Russian Su-75 "checkmate" with no canard no horizontal stabilizers to perform penetration strike.
