Cause and effect of Chinese GDP & ecnomic growth Worldwide.

montyp165

Senior Member
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

They can still do that. Multinational Corps loyalty is only to the dollar. India is slowly becoming a attractive alternative, eg Ford,.

Its current infrastructure might not be very good, but neither was China's 35-40yrs ago, so you can't assume China will remain the Worlds manufacturing workshop indefinitely.

At the very least Chinese economic adaptiveness wouldn't be making the same mistakes the West is making, and still would be the larger producer of high value goods, overtaking Japan in the process as well.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

They can still do that. Multinational Corps loyalty is only to the dollar. India is slowly becoming a attractive alternative, eg Ford,.

Its current infrastructure might not be very good, but neither was China's 35-40yrs ago, so you can't assume China will remain the Worlds manufacturing workshop indefinitely.

All this talk of India replacing China is nothing but BS. With decrepit infrastructure and red tape, You add cost to doing bussiness in India. At 1/3 of Chinese GDP the buying power is not there
 

antimatter

Banned Idiot
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

I just don't understand Why some members are keep denying the real estate problem in CHina when Chinese government itself putting out measures to combat the issue. What's the point?
Just to argue for sake of argument?
====================================================
China moves to curb housing prices amid bubble fears
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2010-02-11 15:41
Chinese authorities have moved to curb soaring property prices, amid concerns that speculation and explosive growth in bank lending have caused an asset-price bubble.

In one of the latest moves, several major banks have toughened lending rules for property developers and reduced 2010 loan quotas.

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the nation's largest lender, said Monday it will stop lending to property developers without adequate project capital or licenses, and even reclaim loans from those who hoard land and homes.

China Construction Bank has set its 2010 new loan quota at 750 billion yuan ($109.8), down from 950 billion yuan in 2009.

Many banks have also cut mortgage rate discounts, after the People's Bank of China and the China Banking Regulatory Commission ordered steady lending growth to guard against asset bubbles and credit risks.

Punishment

The Beijing Municipal Commission of Urban Planning Tuesday said it has rejected planning changes for a land plot in the downtown area, one of the most expensive land deals last year.

Fangxing Property, a subsidiary of State-owned Sinochem, won the bid for the 155,900-square-meter plot for 4.06 billion yuan last June. It then applied to build higher buildings, and change the location of a planned park on what was then known as the "land king." The move was rejected by the commission.

Moreover, local governments have already revoked the rights of several real estate developers to buy residential land, after delays in payment and the closing of deals.

The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources on February 1 said it has revoked the right of Beijing Dalong Weiye Real Estate Development Co to buy a land after it missed the deadline for signing a land transfer agreement.

The agency also decided to keep the 200 million yuan security deposit Beijing Dalong had paid. The company, owned by Beijing's Shunyi district government, bid and acquired the parcel of residential land in Shunyi for 5.05 billion yuan on November 20, 2009.

Dalong is not alone. Authorities in the eastern city of Nanjing said on February 3 they had revoked the rights of two property developers to buy a residential plot they won at an auction two years ago.

The developments suggest local authorities are working to regulate land sales, said Wang Yu, a lawyer at Beijing-based Dacheng Law Offices.

Timely punishment for those property developers that are quick to bid for land even though they don't hold sufficient capital may help curb home prices from souring, Wang said.

Land sales

The red-hot property market sparked huge growth in land sales last year as property developers rushed to grab land on expectations of further rises in home prices.

Yang Hongxu, an analyst from E-House China, a real estate services company, said when the economy is in a slow recovery, many companies, especially those State-owned enterprises with abundant funds, are inclined to invest in real estate for a quick profit and an inflation hedge.

China's government earned 1.59 trillion yuan from land sales last year, up 63.4 percent from a year earlier, according to the Ministry of Land and Resources.

Land sales are a major source of revenue for local governments, especially when other sources dropped off amid the global economic downturn.

The eastern city of Hangzhou netted 105.4 billion yuan in land sales taxes in 2009, the most of any city nationwide, according to the China Index Research Institute. Shanghai came next with 104.3 billion yuan while Beijing was third with 92.8 billion yuan.

Experts said local governments should speed up economic restructuring and reduce reliance on land sales for fiscal revenue, as the dependency makes local authorities reluctant to rein in soaring prices.

Zeng Yesong, a researcher at the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, said to curb housing prices, priority should be put on reforming the allocation of land sale earnings between the central and local governments, to reduce the latter's impulse to make fortunes with land sales.

Key to growth?

The real estate sector in China contributes about 20 percent of fixed asset investment and about 10 percent of gross domestic product, analysts say.

This has raised questions and sparked controversy: has the sector "kidnapped" China's economy, with the government unwilling to take tough measures to curb home prices out of fear it will pull down GDP growth?

Analysts said high home prices also denting private consumption, as a flat in big cities could cost the savings of up to three generations.

"As the property market is recovering rapidly this year, housing prices in some cities are rising too fast. This deserves the great attention of the central government," Premier Wen Jiabao told Xinhua on December 27.

Housing prices in China's 70 large and medium-sized cities rose 7.8 percent in December from a year earlier, the fastest pace in 18 months, official figures showed.

The picture in some big cities is especially alarming: new home prices in the southern boomtown of Shenzhen doubled to 21,660 yuan per square meter on average last October from February, when prices began to climb.

The central government is worried about home price rises in cities when increasingly numbers of middle-income families are unable to afford housing, Wang Tao, head of China Economic Research at UBS Securities, wrote in a research note.

But the government is cautious about taking measures on fears that some measures, if too harsh, could hurt the construction industry -- one of the main drivers of China's economic growth at a time external demand for Chinese exports is still weak, she said.

Given the importance of the real estate sector to economic growth and local governments, the central government will increase housing supply, rather than unveiling harsh measures to curb home prices, China International Capital Corporation (CICC) economists led by Ha Jiming wrote in a research note. Overly harsh measures could result in a slump in economic growth, they said.

The real estate market might remain weak in the first quarter of the year, as the buying spree at the end of 2009 on speculations that tax and interest rate incentives would end reduced the number of potential home buyers, the note said.

But housing prices might continue rising in the second quarter as inflation may leave the real interest rate negative, they added.
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

At the very least Chinese economic adaptiveness wouldn't be making the same mistakes the West is making, and still would be the larger producer of high value goods, overtaking Japan in the process as well.

One can hope so. However with the emphasis on the domestic market whose spending power on products is probably about a generation behind that of the West., how much incentive would there be to channel large sums of money into R&D to develop leading edge consumer products such as leading edge LED Monitors etc.
I visited many retail stores in Beijing with a bunch of people recently,and while we found them impressive,we thought they were a squirt behind in the specs and asthetics.
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

All this talk of India replacing China is nothing but BS. With decrepit infrastructure and red tape, You add cost to doing bussiness in India. At 1/3 of Chinese GDP the buying power is not there

Why is Ford thinking about going there.. Your description of India is not dissimilar to that of China 3 decades ago, when the buying power wasnt there.

In fact it wasnt that long ago when I read an article, that India had a slight advantage in numbers when it came to the number of people who had the same spending power as their Western counterparts.
 

montyp165

Senior Member
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

One can hope so. However with the emphasis on the domestic market whose spending power on products is probably about a generation behind that of the West., how much incentive would there be to channel large sums of money into R&D to develop leading edge consumer products such as leading edge LED Monitors etc.
I visited many retail stores in Beijing with a bunch of people recently,and while we found them impressive,we thought they were a squirt behind in the specs and asthetics.

I'm not one to place private R&D as the paragon of efficiency that certain laissez-faire ideologues like to propagate. As a case in point the Soviets had a thriving computer industry during the 1960's and 1970's (government funded) that was actually as good as anything built in the west, but was derailed by mindless copying of western systems on the assumption that western equipment was supposedly better. R&D historically has been strongest driven by government funding much more than the private sector, because the government is more willing to spend on basic fundamental research while the private sector only cares about immediate applications.
 

petty officer1

Junior Member
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

All the world's countries have corruption, take a look at Japan, every prime minister of corruption.
Like the United States of corruption, such as New York governor, as well as their members of Congress, should not accept the interest groups affected? The U.S. financial tsunami, what is formed?

I interned for a city council man, so off course I know there is corruptions here in the US. And I also lived in Japan, I know all their legislators are run by big business. But I am talking about Chinese government's corruption problems, Which can have great negative effects on it's social and military sectors, So they (CCP) done better than a monarchy dynasty 100 years ago, that is their job to do better. It can't be used as a bragging right. I personally like to set Chinese government to a higher standard. I just like to point out corruptions are now a major problem within China. Qing is just a reminder of what corruptions can do to a country. look at Chinese soccer (football), it is one of the most popular sport in China, yet due to corruption, bribe, match fixing. Chinese national soccer team is now ranked 87th in the world. I am not being a party pooper on China's development and progress over the years, but I am just ringing a bell that China can become Qing again if the corrution problems are not addressed.


you only see some young people life style now, do you see so many young people work hard? if not, how cand so many goods export to oversea? every thing " make in China", now,China's rapid economic development, which is given by God do? Chinese people since so lazy, why will become the world's industrial centers, why not the investors go to foreign cournties?
Whether at any time, advanced weapons,need the people to man them,in particular, the information age, from the people plow hands,War and strategic decisions, operational modes, seize the opportunity and the decision by the people.

I am comparing two different generation. I personally think kids (not all) that live in city don't work as hard as their grandparents, that is strictly a personal view based on personal experiences. I can even argue the amazing development today is due to the hard works and risk taken by the pervious Chinese generation, not the 17 years old today. And what does God has to with anything here?

The U.S. submarine collided with another one amphibious ship, after investigation, the U.S. sailors were on duty were sleeping, the other sailors with headphones listening to music.prior to this, they had several submarine collision.
U.S. soldiers in Okinawa, Japan, South Korea repeatedly raped women,have you heard of the PLA garrison in Hong Kong in rape of woman?
think about this.

Like I said I am not comparing them with American kids, but their parents and grandparents. Also I said before I like to set them at a higher standard. Saying PLA don't rape woman is a accomplishment is like saying people that don't rob a bank should get a reward. That is their job not too, they are called "People's" Liberation Army for a reason, and we should have a higher standard for their actions, And saying PLA are clean as paper when it comes to dealing with civilians in China is not always true too.

To rino123:
In war, or any country who would want to attack China... the participating councils will also gain more if they manage to push back the adversaries. China do have the necessary weapons and hardware though... and close to 3 million regulars forces, even if only a fraction of them are loyal to the nation... it would be say... something around 1 million? coupled with good hardware... I believe China can stand on her own.

I honestly pray you are right about that in the future.

Now when we come to the real estate problem that many had been arguing. I acknowledged that the housing is getting ridiculously high in some cities such as Beijing and Shanghai - heck, even in Shenzhen and Qingdao. But if you looked at those cities... they are highly developed. Investment came from both domestic and overseas to build building - because they could make money out of it. If the average chinese or most chinese couldn't afford to buy those property, why in the world would they build those building? There must be a market for it...

Okay, lets take it back a step. Say if the real estate sector is getting overheated at those coastal cities and Beijing for example. What is the necessary action that the government should take?

1) Build on the infrastructure that would lead to the inner China. Building of these infrastructure do not come automatically - labours are needed? And so job will be provided to these people.

2) With the infrastructure being developed, only then could they attract investment to flow into the inner China both domestically and foreign owned.

Only with the investment being flow back into the country, could China actually curb the influx of her population from crowding the few coastal cities, (I have explain this in my previous posts somewhere. If you have the time, go and read it.).

With less people in the coastal area, the pressure on the real estate will be relieved, thus it will also somehow curb overheating... because we have take away the demand for the building.

Finally... China is a big country, no matter what Antimatter wanted to believe, she had the land and the population... and the only way to curb all her problem now is not the distribution of wealth... but the distribution of developement throughout the country. With developement you will see population movement and distribution... more or less evenly depending on the stage of development in all area.

Just like you said, distribution of developement throughout the country is the key. When that works out, Wealth distribution will work itself out. With a better developed Western China. When people will find good paying job here at home in the west, there is no need to go to eastern coast to find job, which will also force factories in the east to improve pay and working condition. And that is already happenening, I hope the government will continue and do more in the future

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

Why is Ford thinking about going there.. Your description of India is not dissimilar to that of China 3 decades ago, when the buying power wasnt there.

In fact it wasnt that long ago when I read an article, that India had a slight advantage in numbers when it came to the number of people who had the same spending power as their Western counterparts.

I think you are reading too much western press propaganda that use India as poster boy of democracy.But reality is something else

I don't have anything against indian in fact I have healthy respect for their intellectual gift and ingenuity but their goverment is something else

Both country gain independence at about the same time.India has all kind advantages compare to China. She was spared from the ravages of WWII, She has the best infrastructure in Asia. She has the best School system and excellent civil servants. Her treasury is flushed with cash.Her GDP is way larger than China

Compare to them China was devastated by unending war, Anything valuable is carted off to Japan. When the Russian come they stripped anything valuable and bring it back to Russia, No infrastructure to speak about other than a sliver of rail line in north east
For comparison of infrastructure check this website
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Yet within 4 decades China is pulling ahead in all category of Infrastructure and Gap is widening with every day

All this talk about India is China equal is wishfull thinking read this article by Indian professor in overseas India website

India is China's economic equal? Bah!

September 27, 2005


Over the past few months, there have been a number of articles in international magazines and newspapers extolling the rise of China and India in the world economy. Phrases like 'the two Asian giants' have become commonplace.

More fanciful commentators have concocted new terms like 'Chindia' to herald the rise of this new global force. Futurologists have speculated about a 'tripolar' scenario of the US, China and India dominating global affairs in a decade or two from now.

All this has stroked our fragile Indian egos no end. It may even have fooled a lot of people into actually believing all this hyperbole. It's time for a cold dash of reality and a few comparative numbers.

Why the world must watch out for India, China
Indian IT tigers keen to rule China
Let's first acknowledge the germs of truth behind the hoopla. Yes, China and India are the only two countries with populations of a billion plus.

Yes, both countries have clocked strong economic growth since 1980, China at a spectacular 9 per cent plus and India at nearly 6 per cent. Yes, both countries have opened up to international trade and capital in the past quarter of a century, decisively in China and more hesitantly in India.

For comparison table check the website
CHINA versus INDIA

ECONOMY/SCALE

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sources: World Development Indicators (2005); Institute of International Finance, RBI and CSO. 2004 data for India refer to the fiscal year 2004-05.

Yes, if present growth rates are sustained China will rival the US economy [measured at internationally comparable (PPP) prices] by 2020 and India could be the next largest economy, though trailing far behind. And yes, respected scholars estimate that in the 1950s India's per capita GNP was significantly higher than China's.

But that was back then. After the sweeping economic reforms of the late 1970s the Chinese economic juggernaut picked up astonishing momentum, which it has sustained over the past quarter of a century through brilliant, determined and pragmatic policies.

Per capita GDP growth has averaged 8 per cent in the 25 years since 1980, more than double the quickening growth rate of Indian per capita GDP. Somewhere between 1975 and 1985 Chinese average income is believed to have surpassed India's.

India, China could end US' tech rule
Can Indian roads compete with Chinese?
Since then it has kept forging ahead. By 2003 China's per capita GNP was at least 70 per cent higher than India's and her economy was more than twice as large as India's. Much of China's growth was powered by labour-intensive manufactured exports, which took the share of manufacturing in GDP to nearly 40 per cent, compared to a paltry 16 per cent in India.

Other indicators of living standards were just as decisively in China's favour by the turn of the millennium. China's poverty ratio (as estimated by the World Bank's dollar-a-day income criterion) was less than half India's 35 per cent. Female adult literacy was nearly double India's pathetic 45 per cent. Life expectancy in China was a solid 8 years higher that in India.

Perhaps most telling, the rate of malnutrition in children under five years in China was only about a quarter of the shamefully high 46 per cent level in India.

If you think of infrastructure as providing the essential sinews of current and future economic development, China's lead is even more striking. Electricity production in China is nearly three times higher than in India.

Ton-kilometres of freight hauled on railways is about 4.5 times greater. Air-freight ton-kilometres flown in China is nearly 10 times higher. Container traffic shipped through ports is an astonishing 16 times more in China (admittedly inclusive of Hong Kong's shipping prowess).

In India we take great pride in the telecom 'revolution' of the past decade. Despite that, in 2003 the number of landlines and mobiles in India was only one-sixth the number in China.

There are still a few sceptics who question Chinese statistics. The one area where such doubts are most difficult to sustain is the external sector, where the presence of partner country data provides good checks. Here too China's dominance over India is remarkable.

In 2004-05 our economic spokesmen expressed satisfaction over $80 billion of merchandise exports. But this figure pales in comparison with the nearly $600 billion of Chinese goods exports in 2004, which generated many millions of good jobs for Chinese workers and swamped retail outlets worldwide, to the delight of consumers and the consternation of local producers.

Many of the exporting factories continued to be financed by foreign direct investment, which poured in at a rate more than 10 times higher than into India. The tourist trade was equally impressive, clocking some 33 million arrivals (exclusive of Hong Kong), compared to less than 3 million into India. Not surprisingly, in 2004, China's foreign exchange reserves were more than 4.5 times greater than India's and climbing fast.

Indeed, if one looks at the large multiples by which China's infrastructure and external indicators exceed India's, it is hard to understand why China's per capita GNP is only 1.7 greater than India's.

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that PPP price "corrections" are much higher in the non-traded services sectors than in traded sectors of agriculture and manufacturing. And services account for well over 50 per cent of India's GDP and only a third of China's.

Thus, possibly, in the purchasing power parity methodology for arriving at internationally comparable prices, India's larger services share "enjoys" greater upward price adjustments relative to China's, thus damping the disparity in GNP (total or per capita) actually existing between the two countries.

Looking to the future, it is easier to foresee a widening of the existing economic disparities between China and India than a reduction. Just consider that in the decade between 1992 and 2002 China increased her railway freight traffic by an amount greater than India's total rail freight in 2002.

Even more remarkable, the increase in China's merchandise exports in each of the last three years was greater than total Indian exports for that year! At a more qualitative level, you have only to compare the hundreds of cranes deployed in adding to the thousands of gleaming skyscrapers in Shanghai with the handful dotting Mumbai's skyline.

During the last five years while we have debated the new Bangalore airport, China has built quite a few new ones! Finally, how can we hope to close the economic gap with China when almost every second Indian child is malnourished?

Let me put this bluntly: as an economy, we are simply not in China's league.

The author is Honorary Professor at Icrier and former Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India. The views are personal.
 
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

Why is Ford thinking about going there.. Your description of India is not dissimilar to that of China 3 decades ago, when the buying power wasnt there.

Um, maybe to avoid competition, to have access to an untapped market, and lower labor costs? By this time, China really does not need Ford, for there are many domestic, foreign, and joint-venture auto manufacturers doing business there already. There are even Ford clones being produced by Chinese companies. China is already one of the world's top automakers, India is not.
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Re: In 1840, CHina has the highest GDP in the world but.....

Um, maybe to avoid competition, to have access to an untapped market, and lower labor costs? By this time, China really does not need Ford, for there are many domestic, foreign, and joint-venture auto manufacturers doing business there already. There are even Ford clones being produced by Chinese companies. China is already one of the world's top automakers, India is not.

EXACTLY


The article I read had, from memory, est the China wealthy market at approx 60-65million and Indias at 70-80mil.

If thats the case , I would rather be in India without any competition , than in China, fighting it out with several others and possibly bleeding red ink.
 
Top