Miscellaneous News

Virtup

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think this hadith sums up what you need to know well enough:

This strike you as a STEM-developing mentality?
Talk about taking things out of context. The "innovation" mentionned there is mainly about inventing "new" morals (basically what the US is doing with their LGBTQ+ nonsense).
I already wrote about how Islam heavily encourages science and learning. But as @manqiangrexue said, modern Muslims (especially arabs) either misunderstand (out of sheer ignorance) or simply don't follow their religions' teachings, and instead spend most of their time praying, thinking that's all they need to reach heaven (lol). So it's ultimately on them.
I've heard some conspiracy theories about how the current state of affairs is a plot from the west (something about the rise of wahabi ideology from the family of Wahab, a close ally of Saud), but I think it's just loser talk (regardless of if true or not).
Look at the Afghans, soon after emerging from a 20 year war, they repaired a large portion of the military equipement "deactivated" by the US, developed a rudimentary sports car (from scrap metal !) and are already close to finishing their first megaproject: a 270 km long artificial river that aims to solve their drought and famine problems in the north.
Religion has nothing to do with the current plight of muslim arabs. Winners win and losers lose.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
I am getting ready to bash the author until I realize the "innovate" here refers to the invention of new morals.

Yeah sure westerners you can keep the distinction of being the best at discovering new genders. In fact, how do you feel about becoming the only owners of such an ability?
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
I am getting ready to bash the author until I realize the "innovate" here refers to the invention of new morals.

Yeah sure westerners you can keep the distinction of being the best at discovering new genders. In fact, how do you feel about becoming the only owners of such an ability?



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

btw China cured diabetes. Why did the Anglo Zionist led west with their liberal democracy and freedom and ashkenazi IQ fail to do likewise? Why did white supremacy fail the Five eyes? why did Yahweh fail the children of light?
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
WSJ's China-bashing flavour of the week: Moutai!

WSJ is bashing Moutai baijiu for being overpriced, and overhyped, and insinuating that it tastes sucks. Why? Because its Chinese. Well for sure its overpriced and overhyped. It is a classic Chinese status product, a historical brand, and a luxury brand. Its just like the Cognacs, Bourbons, Whiskeys, and Champagnes you Westerners overhype and overprice too. I have no problem if people call Moutai overpriced, but I have a problem when people say that it sucks because its Chinese.

A few things I would like to rant about WSJ in that video:

1) WSJ said: "Moutai is too expensive for young people in China. Economy is bad, so they can't afford it anymore"
- What an idiotic thing to say. Moutai is not targeted at the budget-friendly booze market. They already have many other entry-level brands for that. How come you WSJ idiots never questioned whether Moet & Chandon is too expensive for the cash-strapped young peoples in America?

2) WSJ said: "Moutai is not popular globally. It only sells to the odd Chinese overseas."
- Then you WSJ people have been living under a rock. Moutai is already quite established among the overseas Chinese diaspora for more than a decade already. Moutai is like old news now in the overseas Chinese markets. It is now the big and established luxury brand for baijiu. Kinda like what Henessy is for Cognac. Right now, other baijiu brands are gaining traction overseas too, like Wuliangye 五粮液, Luzhou Laojiao 泸州老窖, and even newer brands.

3) WSJ said: "An overseas drinker don't get what Moutai is. It tastes like ethanol."
- LOL! This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. What? Never drank hard liquor before? Off course it tastes like ethanol! All drinkable alcohol is composed of ethanol! That's what you will smell from any type of hard liquor, be it Vodka, Rum, Gin, Cognac, Brandy, or Whiskey!

WSJ is insinuating that Moutai sucks. Its 53% abv is too high, it tastes like medical alcohol, or nobody other than the Chinese likes it. No, Moutai and other baijiu's doesn't just taste like ethanol. There also have complex fermented flavours of soy sauce, herbs, and a long aftertaste of sorghum. They can be just as complex as fine Brandy, Scotch, and Bourbon, but with a very Chinese taste. Baijiu can be quite unappealing to first time drinkers, but after taking it in a few times, you can start to appreciate the taste. You can either love it or hate it. But WSJ cannot pass judgement that it sucks because its Chinese. That's just racism.
 
Last edited:

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
Bro, it's "Foreign Affairs" magazine which published this type of gold.

1717182158214.png

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

At best, China is a second-rank middle power that has mastered the art of diplomatic theater: it has us willingly suspending our disbelief in its strength.

My only conclusion is this self-masturbatory article serves to assuage neocon's ego as US enters terminal decline.
 
Top