Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
I don't think nukes will be used before Russia has exhausted their own conventional options + whatever they ask for from China/other allies.
The status quo fits Russians well. NATO will strike the only types of targets they can hit with any consistency: stationary, outdated equipment either in mothball or even vandalism of purely civilian structures such as tugboats or ferries. And Russians will reply by bombing NATO training centers in Ukraine.
NATO gets to show it's public at home what totally impactful strikes their "advanced" ballistic missiles have achieved such as the defeat of ferries or dust collecting landing craft. The passage of bodies with US, French, UK flags back home is easy to hide.
And through the destruction of NATO trainers, Russia itself will believe that it has punished NATO, although what Putin may not understand is that most western governments don't care about losses at all, as long as they can censor reports for the public.
Indian victory.
I
One of his recommended strategy on China relations with China comes across to me as condescending and elitist which was and still is typical of western supremacist views of the world:
Much of Segal's thinking and writing concerned the changing Chinese scene and the problem raised by this still authoritarian and non-status quo power - how to manage China's entrance into the international community without either appeasing it through too generous a view of its failings, nor provoking such an antagonistic reaction to Western efforts to contain it that security in Asia would be in danger. Segal's solution was to aid China economically, criticise its failings in civil life, and by constraining - not containing - its more aggressive tendencies.
From his obituary written on the Guardian U.K. newspaper.
I think this essay from Dr. Segal was amongst his last since he passed away that year. He was a Canadian and educated in Israel then moved to the U.K. where he remained for the majority of his adult life till his passing at 46 years old.
One of his recommended strategy on China relations with China comes across to me as condescending and elitist which was and still is typical of western supremacist views of the world:
Much of Segal's thinking and writing concerned the changing Chinese scene and the problem raised by this still authoritarian and non-status quo power - how to manage China's entrance into the international community without either appeasing it through too generous a view of its failings, nor provoking such an antagonistic reaction to Western efforts to contain it that security in Asia would be in danger. Segal's solution was to aid China economically, criticise its failings in civil life, and by constraining - not containing - its more aggressive tendencies.
From his obituary written on the Guardian U.K. newspaper.
It's still interesting that Foreign Affairs still published the same bullshit logic from 1999 nearly +20 years later in 2024. Just goes to show you they are stuck in an outdated era and mindset. That's really to China's benefit to be underestimate quite frankly, by the time they are disproven (or proven), they will be dead (like Mr. Seagal) so accountability doesn't matter to these people.
They’re gonna needs better missiles or better drones to incapacitate or take down that carrier.
the same westerners who say this are also the same westerners who reject Asian university applicants for “not having enough personality” ie Asian features and people scare him/her.
The status quo indeed suits Russia, hence why the Anglos want to change that by striking deep into Russia and inciting and escalating the war; they are gambling that the Russian's wont cross the red line of nuking an american city after using pre-programmed storm shadows to obliterate moscow and various russian cities. As the Anglo/Atlanticists/Zionists lose power, their actions will grow more reckless and desperate, even entertaining nuclear war, if only to maintain power.
I am surprised; Foreign Affairs is supposedly more objective and realist since its audience is the DC Elites/think tankers/power brokers ie the Kissinger types. THe fact that such ideological rubbish is now de rigeur reveals the institutional rot within the Anglo-American power structure.
I would be more concerned if the author was Erik Magnus because Magneto is a very powerful adversary.
The journalist who said this was yet another pompous female Chinese diaspora with an American accent. So yeah you can kinda get what the hell is going on.
But you're right, it is systemic racism. What the white supremacists of all skin colour doesn't get is that it doesn't matter who perpetrates the racism, it still is racism.
Last edited:
The thing about racial apartheid states is that they only see race and nothing else- which is why they think their hypocrisy and their crimes can be washed away when it is advocated by a person of colour, case eg getting an african american to present USG cases for war and genocide in the recent UN vetoes against motions condemnding Israel, vetoes against a Palestinean ceasefire, getting colin powell to wave a phial of powders around, getting condoleeza rice to justify US torture, to say nothing of the many Asian Americans the Anglos recruit for ops against Asian states. By surrounding themselves with servile ethnicites, the anglo zionist elites automatically assume that native Chinese, Arabs etc are going to be similarly servile and slavish and open to being conditioned into being a slave. It does not help when elites of nations like India subscribe wholeheartedly with the anglo zionist world order and their place as servile sepoys in the greater chain of anglo american apartheid world order.
The effect of such servile specimens of diaspora pet Asians/Indians/Arabs/Slavs is that they offer the false hope to the Anglos that yes, they can indeed enslave the entire world, if only the world was "trained" to be slaves, as the british colonials trained the indians, and thus it leads to such miscalculations today, such as nuclear brinksmanship:
EDIT:
It also occurred to me that the USG is escalating in europe, in East Asia, not just to divert attention away from Israel but also becuase of a power struggle that could turn civil war; think about it, they just convicted Trump but now a precedent has been set and who's to say Biden himself wont be prosecuted by Republicans for corruption and hunter biden's porn career? Biden would have incentive to stay in office, in power, and Trump needs the presidency to unwind all of these prosecutions. It's an irresistible force encountering an immovable object. Who will budge?
Only a world war will save the anglo americans from civil war.
Last edited:
They couldn't even obliterate the Russian forces at Robotino with all those weapons last year, how about they start with achieving that
-.-
Unless you mean they'll put nukes on storm shadows? Then yeah they'll get nuked back. But NATO hasn't even begun threatening or naming using nukes. Clearly they care about not mutually destroying themselves vs Russia, which is imho smart because Russia has maybe 10% of the total power in the enemies NATO have decided to antagonize.