Miscellaneous News

Shadow_Whomel

Junior Member
Registered Member
IX. The parties support the Palestinian Government in carrying out its duties in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem on the basis of recognized international principles. The Gaza Strip is an integral part of the State of Palestine. The parties emphasize their support for the Palestinian Government's relief efforts in Gaza. The Parties reaffirm that the Palestine Liberation Organization is the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and call upon all Palestinian factions to unite under the PLO flag and to assume their respective responsibilities in a national partnership under the leadership of the PLO.

The Parties welcome the adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of resolution A/RES/ES-10/23 of May 10, 2024 The resolution recognizes the eligibility of the State of Palestine for full membership in the United Nations and requests the Security Council to reconsider its support for Palestine's membership in the United Nations and to grant additional rights and benefits to the State of Palestine.

The parties called for support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to save it from closure. They welcomed the resumption of funding to the Agency by some States and called on States that had frozen funding to resume support for the Agency. They welcome the results of the independent investigation into the work of the Agency, recognize its neutrality and professionalism, and consider it indispensable and irreplaceable.

The two sides welcomed the recent recognition of the State of Palestine by a number of countries and emphasized that, given that it is a legitimate right of the Palestinian people and an enabler of peace, security and stability in the international region, they called on those countries that have not yet recognized the State of Palestine to do so as soon as possible.

The Arab side appreciates China's long-standing position in support of the question of Palestine and the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in both bilateral and multilateral forums, and the ideas put forward by Chinese President Xi Jinping on the settlement of the question of Palestine, as well as a series of initiatives and ideas put forward by China on the question of Palestine; it appreciates the fairness and justice that China upholds with regard to the question of Palestine, and the tireless efforts it has made to promote the peace process; and it appreciates China's support for the peace process and its efforts to promote the peace process. They appreciate China's upholding justice and righteousness on the question of Palestine and its unremitting efforts to promote the peace process; and they appreciate China's support for the improvement of people's livelihoods and economic development, its provision of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian side and its commitment to promoting the State of Palestine's accession to the United Nations.

The two sides emphasize the nullity of Israel's unilateral initiatives aimed at changing the status quo in Jerusalem, and support the Hashemite family's protection of Islamic and Christian holy sites in occupied Jerusalem and its role in preserving the Arab, Islamic and Christian attributes of the city of Jerusalem, as well as maintaining the existing historical and legal status of Jerusalem and its holy sites. The two sides emphasized their adherence to the existing historical and legal status of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The two sides condemned the continued advancement of the targeted settlement program by the Government of Israel aimed at altering the existing historical and legal status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Syrian occupied Golan Heights.

The parties supported the efforts of His Majesty Mohammed VI, King of Morocco, in his capacity as Chair of the Jerusalem Committee. The two sides emphasized the important role played by the President of the Jerusalem Committee and the efforts of the Jerusalem Fortune House institution under the Committee.

The parties support Egypt in taking all measures to deal with the effects of the violations committed against the Gaza Strip and rely on the Egyptian side's efforts to bring relief supplies to the Gaza Strip immediately, continuously and in sufficient quantities. The two sides expressed their support for the measures taken by the Egyptian side to safeguard its national security, which is also a fundamental component of Arab national security.

The parties support the joint efforts of Egypt and Qatar to promote a durable ceasefire and to put life in the Gaza Strip back on track. The two sides support the role played by Egypt and Algeria to achieve reconciliation between the Palestinian factions.


The two sides appreciated the role played by Algeria and the United Arab Emirates as non-permanent members of the Security Council on issues related to the Palestinian question, including their efforts to promote the adoption of the United Nations Security Council resolutions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and to promote the admission of the State of Palestine as a full member of the United Nations.

The two sides appreciated the call by the Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Qatar for immediate action to help all Palestinian orphans who have lost their parents and families as a result of the Gaza violations. They called on all countries and the international community to work together to provide the necessary medical and psychological support to orphans and amputee children within the framework of the relevant efforts of the League of Arab States.

XXI. The two sides appreciate Algeria's efforts to support the Palestinian question at the political and material levels, and the positive efforts of President Tebbon, in particular his promotion of the convening of the 13 October 2022 conference on intra-Palestinian reconciliation among Palestinian factions and the adoption of the Algiers Declaration, which constitutes a positive step on the road to Palestinian national unity.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Virtup

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think this hadith sums up what you need to know well enough:

This strike you as a STEM-developing mentality?
Talk about taking things out of context. The "innovation" mentionned there is mainly about inventing "new" morals (basically what the US is doing with their LGBTQ+ nonsense).
I already wrote about how Islam heavily encourages science and learning. But as @manqiangrexue said, modern Muslims (especially arabs) either misunderstand (out of sheer ignorance) or simply don't follow their religions' teachings, and instead spend most of their time praying, thinking that's all they need to reach heaven (lol). So it's ultimately on them.
I've heard some conspiracy theories about how the current state of affairs is a plot from the west (something about the rise of wahabi ideology from the family of Wahab, a close ally of Saud), but I think it's just loser talk (regardless of if true or not).
Look at the Afghans, soon after emerging from a 20 year war, they repaired a large portion of the military equipement "deactivated" by the US, developed a rudimentary sports car (from scrap metal !) and are already close to finishing their first megaproject: a 270 km long artificial river that aims to solve their drought and famine problems in the north.
Religion has nothing to do with the current plight of muslim arabs. Winners win and losers lose.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
I am getting ready to bash the author until I realize the "innovate" here refers to the invention of new morals.

Yeah sure westerners you can keep the distinction of being the best at discovering new genders. In fact, how do you feel about becoming the only owners of such an ability?
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
I am getting ready to bash the author until I realize the "innovate" here refers to the invention of new morals.

Yeah sure westerners you can keep the distinction of being the best at discovering new genders. In fact, how do you feel about becoming the only owners of such an ability?



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

btw China cured diabetes. Why did the Anglo Zionist led west with their liberal democracy and freedom and ashkenazi IQ fail to do likewise? Why did white supremacy fail the Five eyes? why did Yahweh fail the children of light?
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
WSJ's China-bashing flavour of the week: Moutai!

WSJ is bashing Moutai baijiu for being overpriced, and overhyped, and insinuating that it tastes sucks. Why? Because its Chinese. Well for sure its overpriced and overhyped. It is a classic Chinese status product, a historical brand, and a luxury brand. Its just like the Cognacs, Bourbons, Whiskeys, and Champagnes you Westerners overhype and overprice too. I have no problem if people call Moutai overpriced, but I have a problem when people say that it sucks because its Chinese.

A few things I would like to rant about WSJ in that video:

1) WSJ said: "Moutai is too expensive for young people in China. Economy is bad, so they can't afford it anymore"
- What an idiotic thing to say. Moutai is not targeted at the budget-friendly booze market. They already have many other entry-level brands for that. How come you WSJ idiots never questioned whether Moet & Chandon is too expensive for the cash-strapped young peoples in America?

2) WSJ said: "Moutai is not popular globally. It only sells to the odd Chinese overseas."
- Then you WSJ people have been living under a rock. Moutai is already quite established among the overseas Chinese diaspora for more than a decade already. Moutai is like old news now in the overseas Chinese markets. It is now the big and established luxury brand for baijiu. Kinda like what Henessy is for Cognac. Right now, other baijiu brands are gaining traction overseas too, like Wuliangye 五粮液, Luzhou Laojiao 泸州老窖, and even newer brands.

3) WSJ said: "An overseas drinker don't get what Moutai is. It tastes like ethanol."
- LOL! This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. What? Never drank hard liquor before? Off course it tastes like ethanol! All drinkable alcohol is composed of ethanol! That's what you will smell from any type of hard liquor, be it Vodka, Rum, Gin, Cognac, Brandy, or Whiskey!

WSJ is insinuating that Moutai sucks. Its 53% abv is too high, it tastes like medical alcohol, or nobody other than the Chinese likes it. No, Moutai and other baijiu's doesn't just taste like ethanol. There also have complex fermented flavours of soy sauce, herbs, and a long aftertaste of sorghum. They can be just as complex as fine Brandy, Scotch, and Bourbon, but with a very Chinese taste. Baijiu can be quite unappealing to first time drinkers, but after taking it in a few times, you can start to appreciate the taste. You can either love it or hate it. But WSJ cannot pass judgement that it sucks because its Chinese. That's just racism.
 
Last edited:

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
View attachment 130355
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
Bro, it's "Foreign Affairs" magazine which published this type of gold.

1717182158214.png

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

At best, China is a second-rank middle power that has mastered the art of diplomatic theater: it has us willingly suspending our disbelief in its strength.

My only conclusion is this self-masturbatory article serves to assuage neocon's ego as US enters terminal decline.
 
Top