antiterror13
Brigadier
must be Chinese fault ..... somehow the bolts or crane or whatever are made in China or there were Chinese ethnicity working there
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
must be Chinese fault ..... somehow the bolts or crane or whatever are made in China or there were Chinese ethnicity working there
They're either too scared or Trump is just controlled opposition.
Too obvious is why. I doubt Trump is controlled opposition, judging by the Herculean efforts the "Deep State" is putting in to trying to stop him. Look at all the borrowing to fuel unsustainable economic growth. I think this is done solely to prevent a recession before November 2024.
Propaganda.
We had stories about Huawei doing this or that for years on end, and still do.
Looks like ByteDance has joined that club.
Look at the date, that’s a current era piece from foreign affairs, not some article from the 90s. The belief that only white westerners specifically Zionist westerners have the genetic ability to innovate is a religious dogma that cannot brook the intrusion of reality.
How a superpower became a supapowa
Regarding the dialogue in Foreign Affairs between the democrat China Hawks and the republican China Hawks, it is clear that no matter who wins the white house, that the PLA must be prepared for a decades long greyzone warfare, potentially leading to a hot war.
One thing they are both supportive of, is increased military spending as if the USG hasn't already been spending and planning for war with China since 2011's 'Pivot to Asia'. As someone pointed out earlier, it's not that they don't want to militarise industrially Cold War era style, it's that the USG is functionally incapable of militarising industrially Cold War era style. Part of it is technical andindustrial know how being lost but i believe it is primarily because of the death of the petrodollar as the reserve currency.
Why else would the USG have to enlist Australia and its taxpayers for $400bln AUD to build nuclear submarines which no australian defence force member will be commanding? Because they are for the US Navy and the USG via AUKUS made Australian taxpayers pay for american military-industrial products/submarines. They wouldn't need to do that if they weren't battling inflation and staring down the barrel at recession and stagflation, the US should be able to just print the money so why dont they? Why bother sending Yellen to China to ask for Chinese investment into Treasuries? Because the entire world is shunning US debt in light of theft of Russian reserves and the USG either must print more QE money to fund those purchases or kill inflation but it can't do both.
You can already see the effects of the folly of US Elites stealing Russian assets:
Good, Indians can now pay for Russian and Chinese goods with gold, rather than rupees.
One thing they are both supportive of, is increased military spending as if the USG hasn't already been spending and planning for war with China since 2011's 'Pivot to Asia'. As someone pointed out earlier, it's not that they don't want to militarise industrially Cold War era style, it's that the USG is functionally incapable of militarising industrially Cold War era style. Part of it is technical andindustrial know how being lost but i believe it is primarily because of the death of the petrodollar as the reserve currency.
Why else would the USG have to enlist Australia and its taxpayers for $400bln AUD to build nuclear submarines which no australian defence force member will be commanding? Because they are for the US Navy and the USG via AUKUS made Australian taxpayers pay for american military-industrial products/submarines. They wouldn't need to do that if they weren't battling inflation and staring down the barrel at recession and stagflation, the US should be able to just print the money so why dont they? Why bother sending Yellen to China to ask for Chinese investment into Treasuries? Because the entire world is shunning US debt in light of theft of Russian reserves and the USG either must print more QE money to fund those purchases or kill inflation but it can't do both.
You can already see the effects of the folly of US Elites stealing Russian assets:
Good, Indians can now pay for Russian and Chinese goods with gold, rather than rupees.
*Machine translation*
Joint Statement of China and Arab Countries on the Question of Palestine
On May 30, 2024, the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum was held in Beijing, and the two sides held in-depth discussions on the question of Palestine.
The two sides agreed that the relevant resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and the United Nations General Assembly, including Security Council resolution 2728, must be fully and effectively implemented, and that joint efforts should be made to promote a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip as soon as possible and to promote an early, comprehensive, just and lasting settlement of the question of Palestine. The two sides reached consensus on the following:
First, the two sides condemn Israel's continued aggression against the Palestinian people. There have been 125,000 Palestinian civilians killed and injured in the Gaza Strip, most of them women and children. The Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip has been forced to suffer a deadly famine and blockade that has cut off all livelihoods, and the systematic destruction of residential areas, hospitals, schools, mosques, churches and infrastructure in the Gaza Strip, as well as the detention and ill-treatment of thousands of Palestinian prisoners.
The two sides condemn the aggression against the city of Rafah, as well as the bombing of refugee camps and the control of the Rafah crossing.
The two sides reject the plans, intentions and acts of forcible transfer of the Palestinian people outside their national borders, which will bury the chances for peace in the Middle East region and lead to the widening and worsening of the conflict in the region.
Fourthly, the two sides demand that the Security Council adopt a binding resolution on the realization of an immediate, comprehensive and sustained ceasefire, the cessation of the forcible transfer of the Palestinian people, the guarantee of the delivery of relief supplies throughout the territory of Gaza, the implementation of the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, and the return of life in the Gaza Strip to the right track. The two sides condemn the use of the veto by the United States to prevent Palestine from becoming a full member of the United Nations.
V. The two sides support the orders for provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice on January 26, March 28, and May 24, 2024, in the case of South Africa against Israel for violations of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and believe that Israel should comply with the relevant provisions of the law, in particular international humanitarian law. The parties emphasized that Israel, as the occupying Power, bears responsibility for the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Sixthly, the Arab side emphasizes the need to implement the resolution of the Joint Extraordinary Arab-Islamic Summit held in Riyadh on 11 November 2023, which includes the breaking of the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip, so that humanitarian relief supplies provided by the Arab and Islamic countries, as well as by the international community, can immediately enter the whole of the territory of Gaza from the north to the south by sea, by land and by air. China expresses its understanding.
VII. The two sides emphasize that peace, security and stability cannot be achieved in the region without an end to the occupation of the territory of the State of Palestine, with East Jerusalem as its capital, the occupied Syrian Golan Heights and the occupied Lebanese territories. Call on the international community to take irreversible initiatives to promote the establishment of an independent Palestinian State and the realization of a political settlement on the basis of international law and relevant international resolutions, including Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 497 (1981), 1515 (2003), and 2334 (2016), as well as the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative in its entirety and in all its points, to enable the Palestinian people to fulfill their legitimate and inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination of their destiny, the right to establish an independent State of Palestine on the basis of the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and the right of the Palestinian refugees to return and to compensation, as stipulated in the UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948). Support for full membership of the State of Palestine in the United Nations. The two sides reaffirm that the “two-state solution” is the only realistic way to resolve the question of Palestine.
The parties call for the convening of a larger, more authoritative and more effective international peace conference as soon as possible in order to launch an authoritative peace process on the basis of recognized international principles. The said process should be carried out within a defined time frame and under international guarantees until the end of the Israeli occupation of the 1967 Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, the occupied Syrian Golan Heights and the remaining occupied Lebanese territories.
Joint Statement of China and Arab Countries on the Question of Palestine
On May 30, 2024, the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum was held in Beijing, and the two sides held in-depth discussions on the question of Palestine.
The two sides agreed that the relevant resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and the United Nations General Assembly, including Security Council resolution 2728, must be fully and effectively implemented, and that joint efforts should be made to promote a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip as soon as possible and to promote an early, comprehensive, just and lasting settlement of the question of Palestine. The two sides reached consensus on the following:
First, the two sides condemn Israel's continued aggression against the Palestinian people. There have been 125,000 Palestinian civilians killed and injured in the Gaza Strip, most of them women and children. The Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip has been forced to suffer a deadly famine and blockade that has cut off all livelihoods, and the systematic destruction of residential areas, hospitals, schools, mosques, churches and infrastructure in the Gaza Strip, as well as the detention and ill-treatment of thousands of Palestinian prisoners.
The two sides condemn the aggression against the city of Rafah, as well as the bombing of refugee camps and the control of the Rafah crossing.
The two sides reject the plans, intentions and acts of forcible transfer of the Palestinian people outside their national borders, which will bury the chances for peace in the Middle East region and lead to the widening and worsening of the conflict in the region.
Fourthly, the two sides demand that the Security Council adopt a binding resolution on the realization of an immediate, comprehensive and sustained ceasefire, the cessation of the forcible transfer of the Palestinian people, the guarantee of the delivery of relief supplies throughout the territory of Gaza, the implementation of the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, and the return of life in the Gaza Strip to the right track. The two sides condemn the use of the veto by the United States to prevent Palestine from becoming a full member of the United Nations.
V. The two sides support the orders for provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice on January 26, March 28, and May 24, 2024, in the case of South Africa against Israel for violations of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and believe that Israel should comply with the relevant provisions of the law, in particular international humanitarian law. The parties emphasized that Israel, as the occupying Power, bears responsibility for the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Sixthly, the Arab side emphasizes the need to implement the resolution of the Joint Extraordinary Arab-Islamic Summit held in Riyadh on 11 November 2023, which includes the breaking of the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip, so that humanitarian relief supplies provided by the Arab and Islamic countries, as well as by the international community, can immediately enter the whole of the territory of Gaza from the north to the south by sea, by land and by air. China expresses its understanding.
VII. The two sides emphasize that peace, security and stability cannot be achieved in the region without an end to the occupation of the territory of the State of Palestine, with East Jerusalem as its capital, the occupied Syrian Golan Heights and the occupied Lebanese territories. Call on the international community to take irreversible initiatives to promote the establishment of an independent Palestinian State and the realization of a political settlement on the basis of international law and relevant international resolutions, including Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 497 (1981), 1515 (2003), and 2334 (2016), as well as the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative in its entirety and in all its points, to enable the Palestinian people to fulfill their legitimate and inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination of their destiny, the right to establish an independent State of Palestine on the basis of the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and the right of the Palestinian refugees to return and to compensation, as stipulated in the UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948). Support for full membership of the State of Palestine in the United Nations. The two sides reaffirm that the “two-state solution” is the only realistic way to resolve the question of Palestine.
The parties call for the convening of a larger, more authoritative and more effective international peace conference as soon as possible in order to launch an authoritative peace process on the basis of recognized international principles. The said process should be carried out within a defined time frame and under international guarantees until the end of the Israeli occupation of the 1967 Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, the occupied Syrian Golan Heights and the remaining occupied Lebanese territories.