MwRYum
Major
Its a head ache for sure. The Indians are waving diplomatic immunity to and fro. But how far does that actually apply? I mean the US is saying it goes only to the point of contention to diplomatic missions. IE spy games. Well other activities are not covered. Presumably this woman's nanny was working in this woman's New York home. Now one question is is that embassy property or just private residence. If private residences then New York law would have jurisdiction. If embassy then its Indian soil. As for the strip and holding? That's SOP. I mean does anyone expect someone being processed on a criminal charge to be granted champaign and caviar , a private cell in the ritz carlton and personal valet?
Despite the propaganda a prison is a prison. NYPD would likely have run her though the same thing as any other processing suspect. The search was likely performed by a female officer, under strict regulations. The new NYPD commissioner Bratton is a known stickler for that kinda thing.
the threats though are not good. By removing those barriers the Indians are potentially opening that embassy to attack from VIED types. By threatening the loved ones of American staff they are opening a whole new can of beans. I doubt they will act on it. As even for the Indian police the charge is rarely used and kept more as threat to intimidate then anything else.
If India do play hardball, the US can always suspend those ongoing military hardware delivery...