Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

pmc

Major
Registered Member
Russia is budget and current account surplus, true. But it also has to keep reserves for non-military things, like running the rest of the country. The end result is that Russian military budget is insufficient for its ambitions so either the ambitions are scaled back or the military budget is stretched to fit the ambitions, which means even basics are not attended to.
I am not sure why you came to this conclusion that military budget is insufficient?. when each product they make is very unique and complex and than require joint tests. Its the engineering solutions that are complex that delays the product for high volume production. they are testing new radar on Naval version of chopper and than adopting to land version. it is not simply upgrade of chopper but increasing the combat radius. if they think range of choppers that already is capable of carrying external fuel tanks need to be further increased. than think about requirements behind UCAVs, AWACS, fighter , special mission aircraft ranges.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The helicopter has also integrated and tested unspecified advanced long-range missiles. The Ka-52M has also been adapted to work in conjunction with UAVs. The data obtained from the UAVs will assist the crew in increasing situational awareness on the battlefield and help to significantly improve intelligence gathering at a greater distance.
To increase the helicopter's efficiency, intensive work is underway to install a new active electronically scanned array radar, the Zaslon V006 Rezets (Cutter) which is currently still under development by the St Petersburg company. It will replace the Phazotron-NIIR radar currently fitted to the Ka-52. A trial version of the radar is already being tested in a Ka-52K.
The helicopter is also equipped with an upgraded BLC (On-Board Load Control System) and the combat radius has also been increased.
 

Aegis21

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think it was meant to be disinformation to make it seem like the Russians missed their timeline. In all honestly 72hrs was way too short and I think the Pentagon knew that but wanted to protest as Russians missed their objective
I had this mindset for a while too but recent revelations show that Russia did not use Kiev as feint but rather as an actual objective. I remember critcizing Russian special forces on this forum early on for rushing into Kiev suburbs only to run from their vehicles surprised when the Ukrainians fired on them. It really shows that Russia expected a blitzkireg where the Ukrainians would immediately drop their weapons when encountering special forces (ex: Gostomel). Also, apparently Russians left parade uniforms back in Kiev when they redeployed to Eastern Ukraine, so the 72 hours objective was certainly the original plan. Overall, the American intelligence had been pretty accurate at finding out about the Russian strategy in Ukraine so I wouldn’t doubt that infrormation. Without American intelligence assistance, I think the Russian offensive on Kiev would’ve been a lot more successful (they could’ve landed those 12 transports in Gostomel).
 

Lethe

Captain
there's some things that Russia outright can't make but need like LHDs. they were even willing to import from France so why not China?

The Mistral deal was not primarily about the Mistrals themselves, but rather about having France assist to modernise the shipyard to build them. Without the shipyard element, the deal would never have been signed in the first place.

China today can probably offer the same thing, though it would indeed require some psychological adjustment on Russia's part first.
 
Last edited:

Lapin

Junior Member
Registered Member
If I recall correctly, Zelensky encouraged Ukrainian civilians to make Molotov cocktails and use them against Russian armored vehicles.
But what would be the likely effectiveness / risk ratio?


"Are Molotov Cocktails effective vs Modern Tanks?"

"I started to dig and found a lot of superficial articles etc. my vehicle books were also far too general to answer this question.
So, I hired a researcher to write a report on the fire fighting systems of the T-72 & T-90 tanks and help me out with various
questions as well, since he looked into Soviet armored fighting vehicles quite extensively."
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
I had this mindset for a while too but recent revelations show that Russia did not use Kiev as feint but rather as an actual objective. I remember critcizing Russian special forces on this forum early on for rushing into Kiev suburbs only to run from their vehicles surprised when the Ukrainians fired on them. It really shows that Russia expected a blitzkireg where the Ukrainians would immediately drop their weapons when encountering special forces (ex: Gostomel). Also, apparently Russians left parade uniforms back in Kiev when they redeployed to Eastern Ukraine, so the 72 hours objective was certainly the original plan. Overall, the American intelligence had been pretty accurate at finding out about the Russian strategy in Ukraine so I wouldn’t doubt that infrormation. Without American intelligence assistance, I think the Russian offensive on Kiev would’ve been a lot more successful (they could’ve landed those 12 transports in Gostomel).
What you describe shows the incredible extent of hubris of the Russians. JUST. INCREDIBLE.

With regards to believing that the Ukrainians would capitulate as soon as the Russians showed up at suburbs of Kiev, I wonder if that was truly Putin's initial belief or he was convinced by others that it would be so, and also I wonder the extent of deliberations that took place with regards to that plan and who were the dissenting voices with regards to it.

The whole operation on the western side of the Dnieper River was undermanned, under-resourced, under-supplied, under-protected, over-rushed, and over ambitious. Even without the benefit of hindsight it boggles the mind as to how the Russians could have drank that cool aid. It shows the extent to which they had absolutely no respect for the Ukrainians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top