Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
Russian positions being hit around Kiev. I think we can conclude this front is essentially abandoned.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Russians might not be utilizing drones and airstrikes to cover their withdrawal well, at least in a number of different locations.

When one undertakes an organized withdrawal, one withdraws from the front first to a series of fortified locations at the rear of the front and one does so successively until the withdrawal is complete, and if one's withdrawal is not one based on a ceasefire, one has to fan out infantry and close air support beforehand to check for ambushes, as well as undertake air and artillery strikes against known enemy positions to prevent their advance against oneself.

Perhaps this is what the Russians have generally been doing... It is definitely not perfect, though... And if the Ukrainians were really inflicting truly massive losses on Russian convoys withdrawing, then one would see drone footage of miles of such destroyed vehicles...
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Each day that Russia fails to significantly escalate this conflict via national mobilisation is a day closer to Russia's defeat, most likely in the form of narrowing objectives to securing the Donbas and declaring this to be "victory". Russia is trying to fight this war like the US and its allies did their various wars of choice over the past generation, i.e. with little to no impact on the home front. It has not worked and will not work, not when Ukrainians are fighting under conditions of national mobilisation, when they are being resupplied by the west, and when Russia has demonstrated little to no ability to interdict those supplies. If Russia is not willing to mobilise its population for war, and not willing to bring out the nukes, then this is over and the rest is detail.
It is over as far as trying to overthrow the regime in Kiev and takin over Ukraine - if both of those were ever objectives. I seriously doubt that they believed that they could take over Kiev. As far as retaining the south, securing the Donbass, and also pressuring Ukraine at various locations of Ukraine's northern borders with Russian Belarus is definitely not over. Russia can sustain such operations there indefinitely without requiring any use of nukes...
 

lucretius

Junior Member
Registered Member
Perhaps this is what the Russians have generally been doing... It is definitely not perfect, though... And if the Ukrainians were really inflicting truly massive losses on Russian convoys withdrawing, then one would see drone footage of miles of such destroyed vehicles...

Ukraine's lack of a functioning air-force means outside of guerrilla style raids and the odd artillery ambush, we won't be seeing "highway of death" style malleting.

Still, the "death by a thousand cuts" approach seems to be paying off... for now
 

reservior dogs

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Each day that Russia fails to significantly escalate this conflict via national mobilisation is a day closer to Russia's defeat, most likely in the form of narrowing objectives to securing the Donbas and declaring this to be "victory". Russia is trying to fight this war like the US and its allies did their various wars of choice over the past generation, i.e. with little to no impact on the home front. It has not worked and will not work, not when Ukrainians are fighting under conditions of national mobilisation, when they are being resupplied by the west, and when Russia has demonstrated little to no ability to interdict those supplies. If Russia is not willing to mobilise its population for war, and not willing to bring out the nukes, then this is over and the rest is detail.
Indeed, if Russia goes home after securing Donbas and not getting an agreement from the Ukrainians to disarm their military, it would indeed constitute a failure. However, even with the slow pace of fighting, the Ukrainians will lose their best troops once the Eastern front is over. There is no stopping the Russians from fighting, one city at a time. They can last for months. In the mean time, Ukraine will be slowly depleted of many key resource for fighting. The other cities like Sumy will be fighting a Russia with very short supply lines and they will not have the same quality of troops defending. Russia can continue this slow war for a long time. Ukraine will run out of time.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
In my view, they were spoiled by the successful military interventions in Georgia (2008), Ukraine (2014), and Syria (2015), as well as the 2nd Chechen war itself and probably forgot about how humbled Russia was at that time (1999). And heck, it's not just them, the US expected Kiev to fall within 72 hours. Everyone overestimated them.

Ukraine, on the other hand, was shamed by its lack of resistance in 2014-15 and how it was taken by surprise then, and have felt seven years feeling shame and preparing for this.
Yes, your view is consistent with this very long post by @Aegis21


It's a great read, and really makes sense in hind sight over the past 4-5 weeks, how things have unfolded.
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member
In my view, they were spoiled by the successful military interventions in Georgia (2008), Ukraine (2014), and Syria (2015), as well as the 2nd Chechen war itself and probably forgot about how humbled Russia was at that time (1999). And heck, it's not just them, the US expected Kiev to fall within 72 hours. Everyone overestimated them.

Ukraine, on the other hand, was shamed by its lack of resistance in 2014-15 and how it was taken by surprise then, and have felt seven years feeling shame and preparing for this.
For generations to come, Russia will now always operate on caution and respecting an opponent from the getgo...
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
Task and Purpose may be a bit biased, but they are better than many of the think tanks (which is just sad). For their newest video, they didn't focus much on the Eastern and Southern fronts, particularly Mariupol, but their focus on Kyiv does illuminate the Russians' intentions there:

Warning: if you can't handle shade being thrown at China, you might want to stay away from this video.
 

lucretius

Junior Member
Registered Member
Indeed, if Russia goes home after securing Donbas and not getting an agreement from the Ukrainians to disarm their military, it would indeed constitute a failure. However, even with the slow pace of fighting, the Ukrainians will lose their best troops once the Eastern front is over. There is no stopping the Russians from fighting, one city at a time. They can last for months. In the mean time, Ukraine will be slowly depleted of many key resource for fighting. The other cities like Sumy will be fighting a Russia with very short supply lines and they will not have the same quality of troops defending. Russia can continue this slow war for a long time. Ukraine will run out of time.

A war of attrition, ultimately comes down to who has the greatest will to win, who is willing to sacrifice the most. Do you feel that is Ukraine or Russia?
 

Weaasel

Senior Member
Registered Member

Igor Strelkov: It is difficult to judge how much Moscow understood that the special operation would be long and difficult​

Part 1:

The progress and prospects of the special operation in Ukraine "Free Press" decided to discuss with the one who stood at the origins of the people's republics of Donbass - with the main organizer of the defense of the mining region - former Minister of Defense of the DPR
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
After the events of 2014, it is more famous to the public as Igor Strelkov.

"SP": - I want to remind you that in this studio we met with you at the end of November last year. At that time, we weren't talking about any special operation. It was hard to imagine that it would start at all and how it would begin. But we discussed the versions.

"SP": - It turns out that the blow is preventive?


- It's preventive. I've already talked to you about it. Last winter, Ukraine concentrated a very strong group to strike Donbass for the first time. Around January-March 2021. In response, we from all over Russia pulled our troops in the same direction. Less than today. But it also turned out very impressive.

You said in November that a clash between Russia and Ukraine is inevitable. And what we will have to choose between surrender and entering into a real battle. At the same time, they very much doubted the right choice of Moscow. The quote from your speech is as follows: "Our country will not attack Ukraine itself, from the word "never". The reason is a blow to the economic and personal interests of the Kremlin."
You said in November that a clash between Russia and Ukraine is inevitable. And what we will have to choose between surrender and entering into a real battle. At the same time, they very much doubted the right choice of Moscow. The quote from your speech is as follows: "Our country will not attack Ukraine itself, from the word "never". The reason is a blow to the economic and personal interests of the Kremlin."

But we attacked in February 2022, didn't we?


- Yes, I must agree that it was we who attacked. If they hadn't done that, the attack would still have been. But - from Ukraine. To prevent this attack, our blow was struck.

As a result, some negotiations took place. And Ukraine withdrew part of its troops from Donbass. At the same time, apparently, Kiev gave a guarantee that it would not conduct an operation against the Donetsk and Lugansk republics. Then the Russian troops also withdrew from the state border.

However, just in case, their military equipment was partially left at the storage bases of the Western and Southern Military Districts. And the personnel returned to the points of permanent deployment in the central and eastern part of the country.

The second time the same group, it turns out, we started assembling near Ukraine at the end of last year. And even on a larger scale than a year ago. That is (I'm sure of it!), there was information that Ukraine is again preparing to attack Donbass with very powerful forces.

But it is impossible to drive Russian troops back and forth indefinitely. Apparently, the Kremlin, having weighed all the information, realized that sooner or later Ukraine still attacks the republics. That Ukraine will still be thrown into battle by its owners. And we decided to strike first to seize the initiative in the inevitable fight.

In fact, it was a strong move of Moscow. I can honestly say: I did not expect such determination from our authorities after seven years of endless "Minsky processes", which constantly worsened both the political and military position of the Russian Federation. Relatively speaking, we managed to choose from two bad options not the worst, but just the worst. And they attacked first.

"SP": - Didn't you get the impression that
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
decided to start a special operation in Ukraine just in a fire order? Literally in two or three days?

I want to explain right away. I mean the sad fate of our gold and foreign exchange reserves, which are half left in the West. Or 15,000 cars that were stuck in Ukraine by the beginning of hostilities and which Kiev has now decided to nationalize. And there was a lot more that, in theory, should not have been provided if the decision to start a special operation was systematic.


- I believe that this decision to introduce troops was nurtied for a long time.

"SP": - However, so to speak, was the "red rocket" given by the Kremlin at the last moment?

- Yes, most likely, only a fairly narrow circle of Russian leaders knew about this decision. Serious attention was paid to secrecy. Therefore, in this case, it was possible to achieve surprise both for the Ukrainian authorities and for those people in our country who could inform the West in advance about the preparation of such a special operation.

But as a result, the beginning of the special operation was really a surprise, apparently, for a large number of top leaders of our country responsible for the economic bloc, for the financial condition of the state, for the property of the Russian Federation.

Most likely, these people did not assume the real reaction of the West to what happened. Perhaps they had expectations that the sanctions would be more cosmetic again. And more - pointless, as it was before. That "vents" will be found in these sanctions. That some countries will go to them, some will not go.
The monolithic position of the West, the fact that almost all European countries will not only support sanctions, but also accept to strengthen them at the expense of their own capabilities, was apparently an unpleasant surprise for the Kremlin.

It is difficult to judge how much Moscow understood that the special operation would be long and difficult. Apparently, the Kremlin, on the contrary, believed that our offensive would develop very quickly. And will quickly lead to obvious strategic victories.

"SP": - That's why, if you allow me. How do you feel about the version that the Russian leadership was to some extent disoriented and misled by the events of 2014? How, for example, was the operation in Crimea easily and bloodlessly given to us? Now, too, it seems, we were waiting for the fact that as soon as we enter the land of Ukraine, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will raise "paws up" everywhere. And they don't lift it. At least on a massive scale.

- Apparently, that's exactly what they were waiting for in Moscow. This is told unanimously by my comrades in various previous military operations, who are involved in the planning of current hostilities in one status or another.

All of them unanimously say that they were given tasks specific to the situation of 2014 from above. Bringing the situation, the commanders assured that there would be no serious resistance from the armed forces of Ukraine. Moreover, the transition to the side of Russian troops will begin quite massive. And local administrations will immediately defect to Russia. Just as it was in Crimea.

Even indirect information from the combat zone indicates that everything was so. In particular, you remember: in the first two days of the operation, no attacks were carried out at all at the points of permanent deployment of Ukrainian troops. That is, when it was possible to cause them really unacceptable losses, when they sat in barracks and did not have time to disperse. During these two days, Ukrainian troops were organized, without losses left their locations and entered into battle with us.
It also suggests that Moscow did not plan to fight them seriously. Attacks were carried out only on communication nodes, at individual command centers. And nothing more.

Then the adjustment gradually began. For about 3-4 days, there was an understanding that a lot went wrong in Ukraine. Serious air and missile strikes began.
This is incredibly hubristic that it beggars belief as how in any existence of any universe they could really believe that?
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Suck it up loser.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Mar 31, 2022,06:15am EDT|303 views
Chinese Drones Come With Political Baggage But Ukraine Buys Thousands Anyway
Thomas Brewster

Associate editor at Forbes, covering cybercrime, privacy, security and surveillance.

The unmanned aerial vehicles are too valuable against Russian invaders for Ukrainians to be all that concerned about whether manufacturer DJI has close ties to the Chinese government.

Drones made by DJI, a $15 billion Chinese company, have become such an important part of Ukraine’s resistance to Russia’s unprovoked invasion that officials in the besieged country are setting aside concerns about the considerable political baggage that comes with them.

Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s deputy prime minister and chief of the Ministry of Digital Transformation, who has become something of a media star in the last month for his ingenuity and defiance in the face of overwhelming odds, posted photos on Monday of new DJI Mavic 3 unmanned aerial vehicles in what looks like the back of a van.

Federov said Ukraine had bought 2,372 quadcopters and 11 military unmanned aerial vehicles for $6.8 million. The money was donated by the Come Back Alive fund, which has been accepting donations for the defense of Ukraine since Russia’s 2014 invasion and annexation of Crimea.

China hasn’t chosen sides on the war in Ukraine and has refused to condemn the slaughter of civilians ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. That’s put DJI and its billionaire owner, Frank Wang, in a bind. The company insists its drones are not intended for military use despite all the evidence to the contrary.

“We do not support any use of our products that harm people’s lives, rights, or interests, as we have always reiterated in our products’ Terms of Use and other public statements,” said a DJI spokesperson. “We do not provide technical support when our products are used for military purposes.”

Ukrainians are also sensitive to the charges, true or not, that DJI is under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party and could be collecting data on the use of its drones. “Every Chinese firm [is] under the Chinese government,” said the spokesperson for a unit supporting the Ukraine military called Aerorozvidka, which uses drones. “We use them but we’re not going to make any ads for DJI.”

DJI has been accused before of having a chummy relationship with Beijing and has long brushed off those worries. It denies its drones send data to the Chinese government and stresses that users can turn off internet settings to stop information going anywhere. DJI has also had to fend off claims that its technology was used to support human rights abuses. The U.S. put the company on an export control list in December, implicating DJI in the persecution of China’s Uyghur minority. Americans were barred from trading in the company’s securities, a year after DJI was barred from buying U.S. technology. DJI has previously said it’s done nothing to justify the U.S. actions.

Ukraine Armed Forces using DJI drones.
The Ukraine Armed Forces has been open about its use of DJI drones. It's likely they're being used for aerial surveillance across Ukraine. UKRAINE ARMED FORCES
Fedorov’s office declined to comment on how the drones were used. The Ukrainian military didn’t immediately respond to requests for an explanation.

“DJI promotes civilian drone applications that benefit society,” a DJI spokesperson said. “In addition to bringing new tools to aerial photographers and filmmakers, we see more and more firefighters, search-and-rescue teams, and other public-safety agencies around the world using our products to save lives.”

Earlier this month, Ukraine’s Fedorov called on DJI to shut down Russia’s use of drone-detection technology known as an AeroScope and to provide any information, such as the location and owner, of any Russian drones in Ukraine. DJI said it couldn’t do that, adding that it was possible it could shut down all of its tech in given geographies, but the action would affect Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, too. It also denied an accusation that it was actively degrading the operability of DJI technology being used by Ukrainians.

As Victor Zhora, deputy head of Ukraine’s State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection, told Forbes, that while the government does have concerns about DJI’s links to China, “it’s a complex issue.” Zhora didn’t immediately respond to requests to elaborate on his earlier comments.

Whatever DJI’s policies, and regardless of concerns around its relationship with the Chinese government, it isn’t stopping Ukraine from acquiring the company’s devices to support its defense against Russian invaders, dragging DJI into the conflict whether it likes it or not.
Why is it being demanded for a Chinese company not to have any sense of relationship with their own country's government? Is any of the leading tech companies or any companies in America don't toe the line with the American government both Democrat and Republicans?

What they're demanding for these Chinese companies to do is totally insane, and beyond pooping annoyingly ridiculous.

I bet if any of the tech companies in China had acted against the government, and instead allowed itself to score brownie points to their American overlords, that company will be celebrated, actions deemed as heroic, and will be on play loop 24/7

Why can't Apple, Google, Facebook not comply from the national security demands their government demand from those companies? We all know the answer to this ridiculous situation, and am simply expressing a common knowledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top