Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Blazo

Junior Member
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory? Is that what "winning" means for them at this point? I can legit see that as a victory of sorts, but I know they must also be disappointed that they won't be able to turn Ukraine into a client state like they did with Belarus. I mean this primarily in an economic sense, since Ukraine will probably turn to the West to rebuild after the war.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory?
Nothing coming from both sides for the past day, they're probably busy. It'll definitely be a struggle as Azov are well armed and will fight to the death.
What the f was even Ben Wallace thinking? Has there no intelligence left within the British government itself regardless of party, political ideology? I don't know of YouTube is even going to allow that episode to be aired because that would make their SeCDeF look utterly incompetent. Master speaker, virtue signaling mofo.
The BBC are already calling it Russian disinformation, but the full version will make it on the internet somehow I'm sure.
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory? Is that what "winning" means for them at this point? I can legit see that as a victory of sorts, but I know they must also be disappointed that they won't be able to turn Ukraine into a client state like they did with Belarus.
Mariupol is just going to be a meatgrinder, so its fall will take a while to occur. Plus civilians are still trapped there, and based on the footage released, it seems that Azov is using them as human shields. I expect the Russians to primarily focus on surrounding the rest of the Ukrainian forces in the east while leaving the siege primarily to units specialized in urban warfare like Chechen and Rosgvardia units who also have some support from some of the maneuver forces, particularly the militia ones.
 

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory? Is that what "winning" means for them at this point? I can legit see that as a victory of sorts, but I know they must also be disappointed that they won't be able to turn Ukraine into a client state like they did with Belarus. I mean this primarily in an economic sense, since Ukraine will probably turn to the West to rebuild after the war.
They might as well just bypass Kiev and run down to Odessa to take the whole Black Sea coast, that is, if they have sufficient fuel and their vehicles can make it that far!

At this point, taking the Black Sea coastal provinces (or whatever they’re called in Ukraine) and securing the whole of the Donbas region could reasonably be represented as a “strategic victory”! Many of us believed, from the outset, that taking the Black Sea coast was a primary objective of this operation. We might have been incorrect, but at this point (again), it could be considered a reasonable “consolation prize”.
 
Last edited:

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory? Is that what "winning" means for them at this point? I can legit see that as a victory of sorts, but I know they must also be disappointed that they won't be able to turn Ukraine into a client state like they did with Belarus. I mean this primarily in an economic sense, since Ukraine will probably turn to the West to rebuild after the war.
Right now Mariupol is like a ant nest after kicking it. Maybe letting the Ukrainians regroup and rot a bit in a little enclave and cleaning carefully the rest of the city. They could even bombard them with ship from Azov sea if they are stuck in the steel factory near shore like we heard in late news.
 

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Nothing coming from both sides for the past day, they're probably busy. It'll definitely be a struggle as Azov are well armed and will fight to the death.

The BBC are already calling it Russian disinformation, but the full version will make it on the internet somehow I'm sure.
I thought the Chechens were going to take care of the Nazis!
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Russians are still struggling to take Mariupol, and it doesn't even look like they've made much progress in the siege over the last two days. That doesn't bode well for the rest of their war effort on the eastern front. So what's the basic strategic plan for the Russians now? Take Donbas, reinforce land bridge to Crimea, and then declare victory? Is that what "winning" means for them at this point? I can legit see that as a victory of sorts, but I know they must also be disappointed that they won't be able to turn Ukraine into a client state like they did with Belarus. I mean this primarily in an economic sense, since Ukraine will probably turn to the West to rebuild after the war.
All these struggles are because the lack of manpower. Russian troops are basically fighting Ukraine in a 1-to-1 ratio or even at 0.8/9-to-1 ratio.

Then consider that the troops are split in 4+ fronts and you get this result.

Artillery, tanks, airplanes etc are all good, but in the end you need hundreds of thousands of troops for a full scale invasion
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
All these struggles are because the lack of manpower. Russian troops are basically fighting Ukraine in a 1-to-1 ratio or even at 0.8/9-to-1 ratio.

Then consider that the troops are split in 4+ fronts and you get this result.

Artillery, tanks, airplanes etc are all good, but in the end you need hundreds of thousands of troops for a full scale invasion
Have the Russians brought up any additional manpower yet?
 

reservior dogs

Junior Member
Registered Member
India aren't getting Russian equipment, they abandoned the PAK FGFA, and going to an indigenous AMCA option. There is no signs US has offered F-35's to India given the CAATSA violation with Indian import of S-400s which can detect F-35 signatures (Same situation with Turkey). Indian refusal to condemn Russian invasion only further divides the QUAD. They aren't even seeking off the shelf Su-57Es.

So the reality is India isn't forced to choose between Russian equipment (canceled joint FGFA project) or American equipment (isn't even offered F-35s due to CAATSA violation with S-400), but has a third option which is indigenous innovation. So don't push some false dichotomy arguments to justify Russia selling top arms to China's enemies while being in US-UK 'special relationship' style alliance.
I was speaking in more general terms, but if you are so hung up on the fifth gen fighters, you need to consider the following,

1. Judging from the fate of the Su57, the Su75 will be delayed for quite sometime. By the time it comes out, if it comes out, a sixth gen fighter maybe close to being ready for China and the U.S. At that time, especially given how slow the Russians were able to produce these, it may no longer pose a threat to China.
2. If J-35 is ready long before Su75, it will take most of the non-Western market such as Iran and Turkey, which would put the viability of the Su75 in question.
3. At that time, especially if Pakistan will be equipped with J-35, India buying a fifth gen plane might be a blessing in disguise for China since more sales to Pakistan and maybe other countries connected to Pakistan.
All military equipment becomes obsolete over time. It may not matter if it comes very late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top