Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
That piece of disinformation is trying to exactly stir a sh*t storm. And people just play to it.

But I'll bite your bait on Taiwan.

Firstly, Russia does not need Chinese military equipment to handle Ukraine. That's so laughable. The only reason Ukraine is still holding now is because Russia is holding back for political reasons, for now. If and when it comes to the point that Russia will need to complete the business, it will have plenty of appropriate military equipment to get it done, without needing anything from China.

Second, should Russia ever need military support from China, things would become so bad that China will support. Because it would be in China's fundamental interest to see Russia not fall. Doubt it would ever happen militarily though.

Lastly, don't threaten China on Taiwan. You appear to be still under the illusion that Taiwan is a card that the US can just play randomly against China when in reality Taiwan has become increasingly a liability for the US. Cross the redlines, China will take over Taiwan and you will lose even the resemblance of piece of card. And don't roll out your nuclear card - we've been there and you know the answer.
@weig2000 Bro the Truism of "Don't March to Moscow and Don't Bluff Beijing" is still unheard of among the Western elites. What kind of schooling are they been given? the Wokeness is so prevalent in Western educational institution that McCarthyism is being employed to those who deviate.
 

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Given how keen Russia seems to be to start a nuclear war with NATO right now, no thanks to the nuclear umbrella idea.

In a few years China will have a much bigger nuclear arsenal than both Russia and America, I'm fine waiting until then.
We might not have that long!

As the Anglo-Zionist Axis knows that, if Russia can maintain near-present levels and China reaches near-parity, their global-domination is over. As such, they might actual welcome a nuclear exchange, if they can involve China, too. ‘Cause, you know, they see nuclear war as being “winnable”!
 

longmarch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why you guys spend so much time arguing that stupid piece. It has zero influence to Chinese decision makers.
Assuming that piece is true, and China is not short of people who can write those kind of things. These type of people came from 1980's, they typically supported Zhao Ziyang, if you still know who he was, with funding or close relationship with the West, Note that current vice president Wang Qishan was also funded by Ford Foundation at that time and got to know
Timothy Geithner's father.
After Tiananmen square, Zhao's inner circle got purged, but same type of like experienced or minded people have been able to advocate many stupid things, none of them really changed Chinese decision making. A couple exceptions to this could be some delay to high-speed rail projects or prolonged one-child policy.
Why CCP allowed these people to exist or infiltrate the government is up to debate.. maybe intentional to keep some harmless idiots, maybe not. But these are some people that even ordinary people can see through, not to mention decision makers.
 

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Careful with the blanket statement. I know a hispanic ex-NYPD who did 4 tours of Iraq/Afghanistan because the money was too good. Does not mean he will go to Ukraine unless the war sponsor raise their offer.
I stand by my statement!

Was he a private contractor truck driver? NYPD pays far better than US military, and they pay over-time! AND, if you’re smart (and, not really that smart), you make more in retirement than you did on the job! So, I’m skeptical of that account.

Additionally, neither Iraq nor Afghanistan were particularly guaranteed to be dangerous. This is the reason that the US is disingenuously comparing their casualty-count in those conflicts to reported Russian casualty-counts in Ukraine.

Also, you did fail to mention why he was ex-NYPD, and did you fail to mention that any ”other” offers might have been a greater motivation than pay?
 
Last edited:

solarz

Brigadier
I stand by my statement!

Was he a private contractor truck driver? NYPD pays far better than US military, and they pay over-time! AND, if you’re smart (and, not really that smart), you make more in retirement than you did on the job! So, I’m skeptical of that account.

Additionally, neither Iraq nor Afghanistan were particularly guaranteed to be dangerous. This is the reason that the US is disingenuously comparing their casualty-count in those conflicts to reported Russian casualty-counts in Ukraine.

Also, you did fail to mention why he was ex-NYPD, and did you fail to mention that any ”other” offers might have been a greater motivation than pay?

There are always people looking to exercise violence in a "legal" manner. From colonial-era European "adventurers" to modern day mercenaries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top