Trump 2.0 official thread

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
I will be happy to debate Joseph Nye if he were here
That's a great idea. You do that. I'm not going to read all that time wasting wall of crap. Everyone in this field, including the guy who came up with the soft power concept, is an idiot except you. lmfao
 

solarz

Brigadier
I don't think my definition of hard power is too broad at all. Literally paying propagandists is diamond hard power. It is only soft compared to sanctions, jets and tanks.

It's soft power because it may change the target's minds and that may change their behavior.

There's no such thing as "soft power". Power is power, and it all derives from the same source. You're arguing over each other's heads because you've got different definitions of this arbitrary differentiation of power.

The US media is able to infiltrate and undermine certain countries because they have the economic and technological capability to do so. The US military is able to attack and invade certain countries with impunity also because they have the economic and technological capability to do so. These two examples of so-called "soft" and "hard" power literally derives from the same set of capabilities, and can be neutralized through the same fundamental actions: the strengthening of your own economic and technological capabilities.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't want to play this game of semantics. The leaders in this field have settled on one set of general definitions that seem sensible. I'm going with that. If we have to account for how strong people's convictions are then these debates will become even more unproductive than they already are.


It's soft power because it may change the target's minds and that may change their behavior. It's not about the employees doing the work. Look at the usa psyops against Chinese covid 19 vaccines. What if the employees didn't believe it? Who cares. The job was done and lots of people rejected the Chinese vaccine and they died because they got duped. Very sad for the people but I'm the American psychopaths are very happy.
Great for you to bring up the vaccine campaign.

The campaign against Chinese COVID 19 vaccines didn't even work in the Philippines, the most pro US country in the world with a far
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
than
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, that was colonized by the US for 50 years and has a political system that is a copy of the US's. The Philippines is a country where the US has absolute dominance in both hard and soft power. It isn't even close! They listen to English music, speak English, have a MDT with the US, deploys US troops, etc. Yet the campaign couldn't prevent the Philippines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the most doses ordered of any vaccine.

They did not have to order those vaccines! China did not force them to order them or threaten sanctions on the Philippines. They chose to order them.

I further don't see how that harmed China in any way. Sinovac got paid for the vaccines. If the buyer chooses to not use vaccines that they paid for, that's their problem. The end result is that China wasn't harmed, still got paid, while a US designated major non-NATO ally was materially harmed.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I don't want to play this game of semantics.
You mean you can't hang in there with logic.
The leaders in this field have settled on one set of general definitions that seem sensible.
This is not science. They cannot "settle" this as long as they cannot defeat rival logic.
I'm going with that. If we have to account for how strong people's convictions are then these debates will become even more unproductive than they already are.
Yeah it's super unproductive talking about soft power cus it's imaginary. Reminds me of the time I heard a janitor arguing with his friend about whether Spideman could take the Green Lantern in a fight.
It's soft power because it may change the target's minds and that may change their behavior.
LOLOL Another stupid definition. Paying someone to act a certain way is soft power? When a mob boss commands respect with his gun and his henchmen obey him, that's soft power too? Even your god Joseph Nye wouldn't agree with that.
It's not about the employees doing the work. Look at the usa psyops against Chinese covid 19 vaccines. What if the employees didn't believe it? Who cares. The job was done and lots of people rejected the Chinese vaccine and they died because they got duped. Very sad for the people but I'm the American psychopaths are very happy.
Uh huh, just like the birthday card example. The US could do this because America is known as a leading power in pharmacology and biotechnology. That's hard power. Do you think if some Bolivians said the same thing, people would take the seriously? No. It's all about the platform you create with your hard power.
That's a great idea. You do that.
Get his ass here. Meanwhile, I'm sorry but you'll have to stand up for your own convictions like an adult rather than trying to lay on Joseph Nye.
I'm not going to read all that time wasting wall of crap.
If only that sort of cop-out declaration was all it took to win a debate LOL

Hey, next time you wannt start this shit up, go ahead and tag me in it if you dare. I'll take you right back here and break you with the same things again.
Everyone in this field, including the guy who came up with the soft power concept, is an idiot except you. lmfao
There is no everyone. Everyone doesn't agree. But Joseph Nye is one man whom I do not put on any pedistal.
 

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is way off topic. This is my last reply.

Who are you talking about here? The United States? Western colonialists (hard power industrialists)? Be more specific.
For sure at least Britain and usa. They gained trust first. They may use religion, business, etc. Once they got enough intelligence, they play divide and conquer and other tactics to destroy.

The US specifically used hard industrial power in WW1 and WW2 victories to lay the roots for hegemony, that's clear.
You need to go back much further in history. It wasn't hard power at first.

Instead, after they switched to soft power (for internal and external control), a few decades ago (70s deindustrialization),
No. Soft power was as thing decades earlier. See Creel Commission -
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The US predecessor - the British Empire - also used only hard industrial power to take over the globe previously.
See above.

The pattern of the Western colonial empires is this - get hegemony with hard power - waste hard power and lose it all.
Not true for the British and usa at least. Maybe other European empires did.

Yeah, at that time they were closest to overthrowing the government, but not close overall if we look at it from a bird's eye view.
You don' t know that. If things get out of control, who knows what would happen. The West has a long successful history of overthrowing foreign governments.

Not just Trump dude
No comment. I really can't tell what is going on. It's a mess.

What do both of these occurrences have in common? Yes, they were both squashed by China easily.
It's great that they squashed it, but how did the West run this campaign for so long? And the fact that they squashed easily means the MSS failed their jobs for allowing it to fester for so long. They proved they can crush it rapidly so the fact that they didn't means they failed to detect it, right?

Better look at this from this perspective: How much money, resources, focus, and energy, did Westoids spend on that to end with nothing?
This is a mistake that Chinese people constantly make. Just because China prevailed doesn't make the strategy stupid. This Western tactic has worked across many parts of the world for a long time. Another example is calling sanctions stupid. Sanctions work really well on many nations. They are crippled. China happens to be a very rare exception that has its own country-sized army of geniuses that can punch through any problem.

That's not so much about the US, but about women's innate psychology (when paired with the modern world) that is universal everywhere in the world where there is even remote modernization.
Not convincing. Chinese women live good lives in China. Very safe, low violent crimes, typically loving households, social mobility, nice guy partners, etc. There's no reason for such animosity. It may be a Western psyop. See

3LKscir.jpeg
 

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
Great for you to bring up the vaccine campaign.

The campaign against Chinese COVID 19 vaccines didn't even work in the Philippines, the most pro US country in the world with a far
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
than
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, that was colonized by the US for 50 years and has a political system that is a copy of the US's. The Philippines is a country where the US has absolute dominance in both hard and soft power. It isn't even close! They listen to English music, speak English, have a MDT with the US, deploys US troops, etc. Yet the campaign couldn't prevent the Philippines
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the most doses ordered of any vaccine.

They did not have to order those vaccines! China did not force them to order them or threaten sanctions on the Philippines. They chose to order them.

I further don't see how that harmed China in any way. Sinovac got paid for the vaccines. If the buyer chooses to not use vaccines that they paid for, that's their problem. The end result is that China wasn't harmed, still got paid, while a US designated major non-NATO ally was materially harmed.

In the wake of the U.S. propaganda efforts, however, then-Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte had grown so dismayed by how few Filipinos were willing to be inoculated that he threatened to arrest people who refused vaccinations.

“You choose, vaccine or I will have you jailed,” a masked Duterte said
in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in June 2021. “There is a crisis in this country … I’m just exasperated by Filipinos not heeding the government.”
source is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That sounds pretty effective to me. Good thing they had a decent leader to steer them through the crisis.

Reuters identified at least 300 accounts on X, formerly Twitter, that matched descriptions shared by former U.S. military officials familiar with the Philippines operation. Almost all were created in the summer of 2020 and centered on the slogan #Chinaangvirus – Tagalog for China is the virus.

same source as above

You think that won't harm China?
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
source is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That sounds pretty effective to me. Good thing they had a decent leader to steer them through the crisis.

Reuters identified at least 300 accounts on X, formerly Twitter, that matched descriptions shared by former U.S. military officials familiar with the Philippines operation. Almost all were created in the summer of 2020 and centered on the slogan #Chinaangvirus – Tagalog for China is the virus.

same source as above

You think that won't harm China?
you showed me their effort, not their results. The results was that the Philippines ordered 45 million doses of Sinovac, the most of any vaccine type. Those vaccines were paid for.

With both hard and soft power US dominance in the Philippines, do you think that this should've happened? That it would've even come to using fake news accounts on Twitter with a shit hashtag, and not just... forcing them to not order it behind closed doors? Or come outright and make a statement of inefficacy?
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
No. Soft power was as thing decades earlier. See Creel Commission -
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
ah, it was never a thing. It was always an extension of hard power or no power at all.
You don' t know that. If things get out of control, who knows what would happen. The West has a long successful history of overthrowing foreign governments.
What is this "you don't know that" shit? What do you know? Do you know that the West won't get conquered directly by hard military power? And even when coupes happen, it's hard power, the sneaky version. After all, you've never heard of a poor weak country couping a strong rich country, have you?
No comment. I really can't tell what is going on. It's a mess.
That should be your motto for everything.
It's great that they squashed it, but how did the West run this campaign for so long? And the fact that they squashed easily means the MSS failed their jobs for allowing it to fester for so long. They proved they can crush it rapidly so the fact that they didn't means they failed to detect it, right?
The West had a serious hard power domination over China for so long. Didn't you know?
This is a mistake that Chinese people constantly make. Just because China prevailed doesn't make the strategy stupid. This Western tactic has worked across many parts of the world for a long time. Another example is calling sanctions stupid. Sanctions work really well on many nations. They are crippled. China happens to be a very rare exception that has its own country-sized army of geniuses that can punch through any problem.
Yah. Why is China so exceptional? Because we have the intellectual hard power to turn sanctions and bans into domestic innovation. Sanctions are stupid against China specifically.
Not convincing. Chinese women live good lives in China. Very safe, low violent crimes, typically loving households, social mobility, nice guy partners, etc. There's no reason for such animosity. It may be a Western psyop. See
Jeeze, you don't know anything about women, do you? The better women have it, the more equal they are to men, the more they complain. Women in agrarian societies where they are subservient to men do not get into these first world problems. They do housewife work and bear babies. The more modern, powerful and educated women become the more they use that to pick up a magnifying glass to point out every minute unfairness that they might suffer and turn it into rage. And that rage is quelled when they find a man whom they truly recognize as their superior to lead them through life. But that task becomes more and more difficult the more equal society becomes.

Besides, the ultra feminist trend did more harm to the US and Korea than it is doing to China. This is not any kind of power; this is a disease spreading.
 
Last edited:

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
There's no such thing as "soft power". Power is power, and it all derives from the same source. You're arguing over each other's heads because you've got different definitions of this arbitrary differentiation of power.

The US media is able to infiltrate and undermine certain countries because they have the economic and technological capability to do so. The US military is able to attack and invade certain countries with impunity also because they have the economic and technological capability to do so. These two examples of so-called "soft" and "hard" power literally derives from the same set of capabilities, and can be neutralized through the same fundamental actions: the strengthening of your own economic and technological capabilities.

Why does Xi Jinping instruct his government to produce better soft power? If it's all the same thing he would just say improve our "economic and technological capability", but he specifically singles out soft power.

BEIJING -- President Xi Jinping has vowed to promote China's cultural soft power by
disseminating modern Chinese values and showing the charm of Chinese culture to the world.

China to promote cultural soft power - Chinadaily.com.cn
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Why? It's because "economic and technological capability" alone is insufficient to get high soft power. You'll get some soft power for sure as the XHS situation proves. But how do you get people infatuated? How do top scientists desire to move and contribute to China? How do you get people willing to pay high prices for Chinese luxury? How do you get people to cry and donate when a natural disaster strikes China?

I'll try to explain this using an example.

American entertainment had a pre woke era and a woke era. As you should know, lots of people hate woke entertainment. And, it's not just the white racists who hate it.

Isn't that odd? America has more or less the same hard power in both eras. So, clearly, "soft power is a non-violent extension of hard power" is a weak theory.

I've explained this before. Producing soft power, at least, in the media takes skill. Pre woke American entertainment had lots of skill combined with hard power. So it create huge soft power - Jurassic Park, Terminator 2, The Matrix, Titanic, Transformers, Lord of the Rings, etc.

Woke era American entertainment has much lower skill combined with the same or even better hard power (better technology) but people reject it. People hate the injection of ugly people, LGBTQ+, they hate the shoe horned race swapping, the boss girl who hates men, etc.

Chinese media is like American woke era entertainment. All the hard power is there but the skill is very low. So instead of joining forces to produce a Terminator 2 level masterpiece, we produce ugly shit like this

f4IqJmF.jpeg


I honestly don't know how this crap gets made. What does it look like? A boy? A girl? No one can tell. It's not cute, it's not sexy, it's just gross like that sissy pants mutants.

Some of the things that people brag about are crazy. The latest thing is the Donbei floral patterns on men's clothing, I think. That stuff is gay looking. Not cool at all. Yet, people appear oblivious.

The little fresh meat / sissy pants look is repulsive to women globally outside of East Asia and South East Asia. Foreign women simped for Chinese men. Did you notice how NONE of those Chinese men look like a little fresh meat / sissy pants mutants?

But bad taste is everywhere across the media. It's not just bad visuals. It's bad cringe messaging. It's bad foreign worship attitudes. It's boring presentations.

The hard power is already sufficient. They need to increase their skill level now.
 
Last edited:

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
you showed me their effort, not their results. The results was that the Philippines ordered 45 million doses of Sinovac, the most of any vaccine type. Those vaccines were paid for.

With both hard and soft power US dominance in the Philippines, do you think that this should've happened? That it would've even come to using fake news accounts on Twitter with a shit hashtag, and not just... forcing them to not order it behind closed doors? Or come outright and make a statement of inefficacy?
Their leadership or possibly a few people in the leadership ordered 45 million doses. Not the Philippines. The masses of people were resistant until Rodrigo Duterte ordered them to get vaccinated (it's in the quoted text in my prior message).

Not sure what you're trying to suggest. It almost seems like this is a case study on the limits of American hard power. Have you turned to the dark side?
 
Top