Ah Trent transformed from tires expert to later Russian nuclear weapons expert and then counterbattery radar countermeasure expert and now artillery targeting.
Honestly I do not know anything about the author, but there was potential to learn a little more about an interesting piece of indirect fire software that was ruined by the choice of Twitter? You have a bunch of cut-off sentences and numbers polluting the "article", it made it impossible to read.
Ballistics calculation seems like high school trig, but when you consider the distances (40+ km for 203mm Pion and 155mm Excalibur), then small deflections can create huge inaccuracies. All good software must consider at the very least meteorological conditions and even Coriolis effect (rotation of the earth) at these distances.
He is kind of insulting the US software, maybe its old and clunky, but can this Ukrainian one come up with full battery firing solution? Maybe it could, like I said, it was a crap format and couldn't read it all. Ukrainian programmers are not slouches, so I'm confident that it can be effective.
Speaking of supplies, here are some of the artillery the Ukraine has/will receive:
- 90 M777 howitzers and an unknown number of M142 HIMARS,
- 4 howitzers M777 with adjustable ammunition,
- an unknown number of AS-90 self-propelled artillery mounts,
– 12 CAESAR units
- up to 24 German self-propelled guns PzH 2000,
- up to 24 self-propelled guns M109A4BE,
- 20 self-propelled guns 2S1 "Gvozdika" and several MLRS BM-21 "Grad",
– 20+ self-propelled guns DANA and DANA M2, as well as several MLRS RM-70 ("Grad" on the Czech base),
– 18 Zuzana wheeled self-propelled guns,
- 9 Soviet howitzers D-30.
Even ignoring the 152/155mm issue, how is Ukraine supposed to support so many different platforms? Do NATO units not need spares? It sounds like a logistical nightmare.
Some of the NATO countries are already basically down to their bare inventory. I'm sure you saw in the news that Taiwan will not receive any M109, Stingers, or Javelins this year (what happened to that imminent PLA invasion??, lol).
I mentioned this myself before, without even talking about being destroyed by fighting, anything like accidents, rough handling could break an axle, flatten a tire, even stupid things like nuts and bolts might not be available to service foreign equipment. The only logical conclusion is that if these things are to be used on the front line, they will be abandoned immediately if anything goes wrong.
One thing we do know is that they aren't being used on the front line yet for the most part, they are still doing work up training for things like the M777, so there's that.