Putin is hoping to preserve minimal goodwill among Ukraine populace to secure a semi-permanent negotiated settlement, so that is why he isn't razing the infrastructure to ground with full force of RuAf and missile force. Maybe that was a valid strategy at beginning when there was a solid chance of Ukraine quickly sueing for peace upon Kiev rapid encirclement, shock and awe 5-axis multi-prong invasion ...
I agree. Despite multiple instances of obvious NATO involvement and despite the failure of the Kiev push to make the Ukranian leadership collapse, they insist on treating this like this is Chechnya and an internal matter, which it isn't and hasn't been for a while now.
However what I assess is that Russia as a military superpower is over, Russia as a Great Power+ is over, Russia as a Great Power in 10 years is also over. Russia as a counterweight to Europe is also over.
I kind of disagree. Not a superpower, yes, that was over the moment the USSR collapsed and even before when Gorby took over, but still is a great power.
Take a look the effect they are having on the European economy where the sanctions are fucking them more than they are fucking Russian itself. That Europe keeps pushing is more a matter of European chihuahua-like suicidal tendencies to please the US betting things work out for them before it gets worse.
Again, it is a suicidal bet with no guarantees it will work, but people who join Green Parties or people like Boris aren't the sharpest tool in the shed, either.
Another case in point, should Russia decide to set a bomber base again in the Caribbean, watch the US lose its shit and do a "special military operation" of its own in the name of "democracy and human rights" in the "affected" country.
That to me are signs of Russia of still being a great power. Now, if Russia losses, then I'll agree with you because the geopolitical scenario changes completely.