The War in the Ukraine

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
One of the pro-Russian telegram channels has claimed the navy has used the still in-development Kalibr-M against targets in Ukraine. The claim includes a range of 4500km and a 1000kg warhead, which would put it at twice the range of that of the Tomahawk, and would be kind of impressive if the missile still fits in the existing UKSK VLS.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If the range is true in all conditions, then a ship in the Caspian Sea could hit any target within europe, let alone Ukraine. It'll take forever, though

map.gif
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
Russia has only little short term incentive to spare the mercenaries to enable quicker resolution to some immediate tactical problems. It has considerably more long term incentive discourage would be mercenaries from taking up arms against russia in the first place by treating them with the utmost harshness.
 

Janiz

Senior Member
Good watch, pretty much corroborates what everyone has been saying here.
No wonder. He's just as much expert as "everyone" here.

The main problem here, as he likes to say all the time, it's a war against Ukraine. Not NATO. An exemplary "lesson" for NATO from this war should be like "Russian A2/AD bubbles aren't as scary as they were portrayed - analysis of capabilities", "Importance of air superiority over battlefield and striking long range distance targets" or "At what point when Russians fail they start relying on the old Soviet tactics" for example.

There's a lot of things like that, not "tanks are obsolete" - so obsolete that every country with serious military force is investing heavily in those capabilities.
 
Top