The War in the Ukraine

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
According to an article in The New York Times U.S. lacks a clear picture of Ukraine’s War Strategy

American intelligence agencies have less information than they would like about Ukraine’s operations and possess a far better picture of Russia’s military, its planned operations and its successes and failures, according to current and former officials.

U.S. officials said the Ukrainian government gave them few classified briefings or details about their operational plans, and Ukrainian officials acknowledged that they did not tell the Americans everything.

“How much do we really know about how Ukraine is doing?” said Beth Sanner, a former senior intelligence official. “Can you find a person who will tell you with confidence how many troops has Ukraine lost, how many pieces of equipment has Ukraine lost?”

Ukraine, the officials said, wants to present an image of strength, both to the public and to its close partners. The government does not want to share information that could suggest a weakening of resolve, or give the impression that they might not win. In essence, Ukrainian officials do not want to present information that might encourage the United States and its other Western partners to slow the flow of arms.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to an article in The New York Times U.S. lacks a clear picture of Ukraine’s War Strategy



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is nonsense. Are we seriously to believe that the US doesnt have satellites and cant count bullets and tanks? This article is there for the purpose of deflection when it inevitably goes bad for Ukraine, "we didn't know they were losing and selling all those Javalins on craigslist".
 

Zichan

Junior Member
Registered Member
Apparently, the inability to manufacture enough chips is proving to be a major bottleneck in the US’s ability to keep Ukrainian forces supplied with arms. I didn’t expect the Javelin to have 50 times as many chips as a modern smartphone:

“"I talked to all the national defense contractors recently, who are working overtime in the Ukraine replenishment issue and their biggest pain point is chips," Raimondo said at a Senate Commerce hearing in April. "There are 250 chips or more in every Javelin launching system. This has to happen - it has to happen now."

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Apparently, the inability to manufacture enough chips is proving to be a major bottleneck in the US’s ability to keep Ukrainian forces supplied with arms. I didn’t expect the Javelin to have 50 times as many chips as a modern smartphone:

“"I talked to all the national defense contractors recently, who are working overtime in the Ukraine replenishment issue and their biggest pain point is chips," Raimondo said at a Senate Commerce hearing in April. "There are 250 chips or more in every Javelin launching system. This has to happen - it has to happen now."

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The funny part is all the discussions about Russian equipments difficulties related to chips... now it's the US with more of the same.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
I have always wondered if and when the West would think about dumping old M60 tanks to Ukraine. They have already sent M113s, M777s, M109s, and now M142 HIMARS. As suspected, some warmonger in the US is bound to discuss this idea.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This article mentions that the US has a sizable collection of old M60s in its Sierra Army Depot. Nevertheless, to the article's credit, it also mentions that M60s would be a bad idea for Ukraine, simply because of crew training and logistics. So Ukraine is better off receiving more T-72s which its army is quite familiar with. Still the article suggests at the end that those M60s should be reserved for a certain rebellious island province off the east coast of China. Typical American warmonger writing.

Even if America sends M60 tanks to Ukraine, I doubt they'll have much of an impact. The tank is already inferior on paper to the numerous Russian T-72 tanks already in the battlefield, both in armament and protection. The only advantage the M60 might have over some of the older Russian T-72s is its superior FCS and Thermal sight. The M60 also is physically bulkier than the T-72, making it easier to spot and destroy by infantry and air assets. Overall, the older variants of M60s are too outdated to do much against Russia in 2022.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I have always wondered if and when the West would think about dumping old M60 tanks to Ukraine. They have already sent M113s, M777s, M109s, and now M142 HIMARS. As suspected, some warmonger in the US is bound to discuss this idea.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This article mentions that the US has a sizable collection of old M60s in its Sierra Army Depot. Nevertheless, to the article's credit, it also mentions that M60s would be a bad idea for Ukraine, simply because of crew training and logistics. So Ukraine is better off receiving more T-72s which its army is quite familiar with. Still the article suggests at the end that those M60s should be reserved for a certain rebellious island province off the east coast of China. Typical American warmonger writing.

Even if America sends M60 tanks to Ukraine, I doubt they'll have much of an impact. The tank is already inferior on paper to the numerous Russian T-72 tanks already in the battlefield, both in armament and protection. The only advantage the M60 might have over some of the older Russian T-72s is its superior FCS and Thermal sight. The M60 also is physically bulkier than the T-72, making it easier to spot and destroy by infantry and air assets. Overall, the older variants of M60s are too outdated to do much against Russia in 2022.
If I remember correctly when US retired their M60 and said they're up for sale at scrap metal prices the very first thing ROC did was rush over to the US and picked out a bunch of the best condition ones. Then after them several other countries came and did the same, each one of them getting the left overs.

By the end I imagine the M60 that still remain are in pretty poor condition indeed.

I'm not sure what good is more M60 for ROC, I doubt it can trade favorable with even Type 11 assault gun.
 

FADH1791

Junior Member
Registered Member
My understanding is up to this point the Ukrainian government has reinforced the Donbas pocket with at least seven Territorial Defense Forces brigades. As we've seen so far these TDF formations lack the mechanization to allow them to be used for mobile warfare but for staying still and holding the line they're better than nothing (as long as you don't care about lost Ukrainian lives).

Don't know about the withdraw, but in the last 24 hours Russians counterattacked the Ukrainian Severodonetsk counterattack and took all the lost ground and more, including Mizhnarodnyy Aeroport to the south east. Basically the Severodonetsk counterattack has turned out to be feeding once again. On that note I asked someone who plays DotA exactly what "feeding" means and he explains during a game the team of five is meant to communicate and work together. When it's time to pounce on the other team the five players should work together and show up to the battlefield at exactly the same time, preferably from multiple directions. When the conditions are not right and not all five are in position the others already in position are meant to avoid the enemy team.

Feeding happens when one team is working in unison and the other team is not and their players show up one after another in piecemeal fashion. They are then easily defeated in a string of 5v1 engagement in a classed defeat in detail.

When this metaphor is applied to this war what it means is instead of accumulating NATO military aid until you've gathered a few full strength armour brigades at Lviv, the Ukrainian are sending the military aid they are receiving into critical sectors as soon as they receive them, in piecemeal fashion and with little training against Russians who have local numerical and fire superiority. It's little wonder then these western gear are making little impact on the battlefield.
That’s why I don’t buy the fact there is this massive summer/fall offensive where 1 million Ukrainian men will push Russia out. Like you said they are sending western aid immediately to the battlefield. And they are sending TDF reservist to plug the gaps in Donbass. And these TDF units have two weeks of training. They have AK’s, machine guns, RPGs, some manpads and atgms. But they are facing heavy Russian artillery, missile bombardment and aerial bombardment. If Kiev was smart these TDF units should be sent to cities like Odessa,Khariv, Dnirpo to reinforce the defense of those cities. Donbas is lost. Instead they are wasting them getting them annihilated. Don’t know how much longer this can last.
 
Top