Remember for the west all wars are just opportunities for defence companies to advertise their products. You think it's a coincidence we heard so much about M777s, starstreaks, and so on. It was all marketing BS. In Afghanistan wikileaks showed that Sweden wanted the Gripen to conduct strikes specifically to increase the prospect of exports.
Sometimes you wish someone, somewhere, somehow would have used drones maybe, or some other methods, to eliminate those defence companies HQs, production bases, CEO and other C-level executives and remained anonymous afterwards.
A lot of senseless murder, mayhem, suffering around the world could be avoided that way. But I digress.
Both Russians and Ukrainians have put up a valiant performance. Both nationalities have been fighting against great odds. Russians are essentially fighting NATO in a proxy war while sanctioned, embargoed, having their assets seized, vilified and demonised.
Ukrainians, having given up their nuclear deterrence for worthless paper promises, have to fight against the bulk of the successor state of the USSR. No strategic level systems are exported to Ukrainians ensuring that Ukraine remains a useful proxy for NATO to wear out Russians.
Both countries have performed very well under the constraints that they have been put under.
It would be interesting to see where Putin would like to stop. Cut Ukraine off from the sea? Occupy Russian speaking Eastern regions? Occupy all of Ukraine or expand the theater of operations to neighbours like Poland or some other country?
Zelensky claimed, six days ago, the Russians had launched 2,400 missiles in Ukraine as of that day. That was assisted by over 3,000 aircraft sorties. It seems the impact of ballistic or cruise missiles may be overrated as is the impact of aerial bombardment on a mid sized country such as Ukraine.