Please provide relevant commentary for the Twitter link.
Last edited by a moderator:
The IFV were full of infantry on top and running into artillery. Maybe the vehicules pass but damn, these poor lads are in the shrapnel zone, they could be hit at over 50m and have nowhere to go. Disembarking means better cover but staying in the zone. Going with the tank make them leave the zone but at the cost of being totally exposed.Happened again, this time in Avdiivka:
To be fair that barrage also shows how Russia is sorely lacking precision attack weapon. But anyway the vehicles tried to cross an open area and Russian artillery just kept pounding them until they decided to back off and run away, leaving behind a few destroyed vehicles.
Conceptually, having your ships as a sitting duck taking ground-based anti-ship missiles, is a losing strategy.
Ukraine receiving harpoons and M109 self-propelled howitzers. Would be a test of Admiral Grigorovich-class air defense if they are used.
The best way to intercept them is to destroy them before they launch. They know they are coming... so more UAV to find them and Russia can just Iskander them... Orlan bomblets can be enough to damage components. We will see if patriot are good against small UAV.Well if there is A-50 over the black sea, chance of intercepting low fliers increased considerably. Russians seems to deploy one already in Black sea. That will help alot against Harpoon. Would also be nice to get planes too to intercept the missiles before it reach the ship.
Or something landed in the middle of a lot of something very volatile...
Nobody has real-time GEO monitoring capability right now for the kind of work that you talk about. All NATO and China are doing are using low earth observatory satellite constellations. And as of today even these constellations are NOT real-time. They are basic, but very expensive to have. Think about when did Russia launched the last GLONASS?Doesn't Russia have geostationary satellite with real-time monitoring capabilities? Russia is a reputable space power with independent GLONASS GNSS and ISS modules, why would Russia not own this relatively basic tech that even commercial companies deploy and rely on China to supply it? Also, if geostationary, Chinese satellite are more likely focused on Asia-Pacific region than Eastern Europe.
The West can keep sending hundreds of such missiles to Ukraine