Really? I see by far still not the best from NATO … no fighters, no longe range missiles (except the Storm Shadow) … not yet any modern tanks in great numbers …
by the way, the latest "Wagner map"
View attachment 112494
I have published a map of the previous day.
So it is not the same.
As for "not the best".
Of course it is not the best as NATO does not equip all its units with "the best", go and check how many Leopard A7s Germany operates. and how many of older models, so yes, the AFU is a de facto NATO army, not only that, but one of the largest and best equipped.
Why? I don't understand why people keep treating anecdote, rumors, and "confirmations" from biased parties as credible inputs.
All of these are speculations or loose inferences at best. It's like the whole "casualties" and "attrition ratios" discussion. We cannot put any degree of confidence on such numbers or "trends".
So Ukraine is operating with NATO frontline equipment, but they have not been given a communications one. It's simple logic.
There are 8 AFU brigades equipped with NATO line equipment, trained in NATO training camps, the AFU air force is using decoys used by the US Air Force, but in all of this, no one has given Ukraine communications equipment even though NATO says in their aid packages that they are doing so?
Not to mention that in 2014-2022 NATO was also helping the AFU to modernise ....
About the night news, there was a lot of VKS activity in all the Ukranian territory, including the destruction of a big number of ammo depot as fas as Lviv (under NATO AWACS hehe).
In turn AFU managed to hit the former offices of LPR Interior Ministry in Lugansk.
Also another M777 got rekt: