Taiwan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yes but the MK-13 are remove before several years on this 4 new Perry which lack AAA missiles unlike other, the ideal would be to install one MK-41.
I doubt they will get, or afford the Mk-41. Better to install a RAM forward for self defense.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well The Controls and pistol grip as well as layout are borrowed form the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the T91,T86,and T68 which themselves were more or less piston AR's. now as to the barrel and the bolt I would agree likely 9mm Nato spec but the Chamber is a little different. 9mm chambered assault rifles not unheard of, The Colt 9mm SMG based on the CAR 15, Steyr Para 9mm and the MicroTavor 9mm. because the 5.56mm Nato Rounds are full pressure assault rifles rounds the pressure rating in a mil spec chamber is more enough.
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
Again, you're taking the Perry class purchase and comparing to individual points instead of the sum which would really be a better measurement on the effectiveness of the purchase. Missile boats can delay till USN but it's not as suitable against Philippines or Vietnam down south in the Spratlys. They wouldn't have the endurance for extended deployment. Vietnam is no natural ally. Infact, the garrison on Taiping reports the Vietnamese probing their defenses out there with regular incursions. I already also said replacing the Knox(s) would be a good idea in terms of streamlining the fleet. Keeping a sizeable navy is still something Japan would need to think about. Japan really doesn't consult much with Taiwan such as enlarging the ADIZ back in 2010 or even negotiating a fishing agreement. The latter only happened because it didn't want China and Taiwan to start working together. There were 15+ odd talks that went nowhere, then the year of water cannon fights and joint CG exercises, all of a sudden, a fishing agreement was reached.

As much as folks say what country is willing to sell ballistic missiles, equally what country these days would risk fraying relations with China and sell new frigates?

Are Philippines,Vietnam and Japan main opponents of Taiwan now ? ;) Does Taiwan needs 10+ frigates to deter Vietnam ? How likely is Japan vs Taiwan war with other parties staying neutral ? Let's not delude ourselves - primary opponent of Taiwan is China .Perry-class is unsuited to fight such opponent, especially since USN removed even Mk13
launchers and Harpoons from their ships (Taiwan would have to pay to retrofit them or their own missiles ) .

Buying large number of frigates is a product of inertia and denial of reality - Taiwanese planers are still stuck in 70's and 80's with weak PLAN they could hope to meet in open seas. I won't exclude corruption and bribes as a motive either, but since we have no definite proof I won't discuss it further.
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
A perry class could do some ASW work. It is also smaller, so less of a target than say, what their kidd class DDGs will be (or indeed what a mini aegis ship will be)

The Perry's are very decent ASW platforms. They are also very good patrol vessels. While they can be upgraded to provide better self defense anti-air wise, they were never meant to go up against saturation ASM attacks.

ASW against what opponent and at what location ? In case of war against China those ships have almost zero chance of survival far from Taiwan itself. And to do ASW work around island you don't need frigates - sonar buoys could be placed and helicopters could take off from land .

Or Taiwan needs to maintain huge fleet of frigates just to keep in check few Vietnamese subs way down south :D ?
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
ASW against what opponent and at what location ? In case of war against China those ships have almost zero chance of survival far from Taiwan itself. And to do ASW work around island you don't need frigates - sonar buoys could be placed and helicopters could take off from land .

Or Taiwan needs to maintain huge fleet of frigates just to keep in check few Vietnamese subs way down south :D ?
You are mistaken in two key areas:

1) Having very good ASW frigates will be critical all around the island in case of conflict. Sonar buoys and hyrdraphone networks are not enough...not by a far shot. Particularly to the east of the island in ensuring that a blocking force of hostile submarines trying to prevent resupply or assistance from that direction is broken.

2) These vessels are not completely defenseless, and would probably have support as well, in any scenario doing ASW work further from the islands, say down further in the SCS and would prove an invaluable asset for the ROCN in those areas for operations there.

The ROCN planners know what they are doing. They have made the best choice possible given their funding and choices.
 

Franklin

Captain
The problem for Taiwan's navy is that the biggest threat to them doesn't come from under the sea but increasingly comes from the air. And that's were they are weak. For the PLAN its the opposite they have very good air defence systems on their ships but are weak when it comes to ASW. And that's why the story of the US helping Taiwan to build SSK's is so important. I believe the PLAN is starting to invest in their ASW capabilities but it will take some time for the new technologies and trained personnels to come through.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
The problem for Taiwan's navy is that the biggest threat to them doesn't come from under the sea but increasingly comes from the air. And that's were they are weak.
The ROCN has to be ready for several scenarios.

First is conflict with the mainland. In such a scenario it is true that they will be subject to massive ballistic missile bombardment to try and negate their air force, their air defense, and any navy in port. But the ROC is prepared to defend against a certain amount of that, and absorb the rest, depending...and absolutely relying on...help from the east in the form of the US Navy. That will be their ultimate life line. The submarine threat is going to be one of, if not the most dangerous threat to that happening. So their ASW capabilities to stave off a blockade/picket line of submarines to their east will be absolutely critical. And these Perry frigates from the US, as well as their own builds, will be absolutely critical to that.

Second is the potential for conflict with smaller nations in the South China Sea. Some of these nations are going to have decent submarine warfare capabilities and the Perry frigates would be absolutely critical in any conceivable confrontation with any of those powers.

Third, patroling against piracy and asymetric threats from terrorist. While the Perry's ASW capabilities will not come so much into play in this scenario, their excellent sea keeping abilities, the fire power they have, and particularly their helicopters would also play an important role in those duties if required.

These US transfer Perry's will serve the ROCN well...but (unlike the local built Cheng Kung Perry FFGs) they will not be a strong anti-surface warfare vessel against other maritime powers who have their own strong anti-surface capable desttroyers, frigates or corvettes. That is, uinless the ROCN upgrades them and adds the ASuW missiles to them as well. Otherwise, the ROCN will have to rely on its missile boats, the Kang Ding FFGs, (and as stated) the local built Cheng Kung FFGs, or the Kee Lung DDGs for that.
 

Franklin

Captain
I was actually thinking about China's increasingly capable air force. In a war situation the ROCN ships will face wave after wave of attacks from J-10's and J-11's armed with anti-ship missile's. And now the even more capable J-10B and J-16 are coming online as well. The ROCN ships in my view don't have enough air defence capabilities to handle such a saturation attack from the PLAAF and the PLANAF. And those attacks from planes will be combined with attacks from other PLAN ships like the Type 054A and Type 052C/D etc. And yes they will also be attacked by subs as well. The Taiwan Straits is only 140km wide and that's within range from both sides air defence and coastal defence assets. This means that ships and planes from both sides can be hit from land based assets not just sea and air. I think China's ballistic missile attacks will be aimed at land targets not the ships. And no doubt it will be aimed at those air defence and coastal defence assets.
 

shen

Senior Member
forget about PRC, ROC need the Perry to guard against unauthorized attacks by the Filipino coast guard on ROC fishing boats.
 
Top