Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and Global South strategic cooperation

B

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
coolgod said:
It's not a conspiracy. I don't just mean the Chinese gov doesn't publish major articles on terrorist attacks, I mean the Chinese gov actively hides and censors discussions about terrorist attacks in China.

I'm not saying reeducation was too large in scope or unjustified. I'm pointing out the separatist terrorism activities in China, e.g., Xinjiang was much more severe than what the official narrative is, same with Xizang.
Click to expand...
? There is no such as "official narrative" wherever public are involved. We have accurate story and count of every terror incident, as long as it was witnessed by civilians.

What did they hide was the strength of the response. For example, we still have no clue whatsoever into how much resources were mobilized to the MSS and certain army/armed police spearhead units.

Yes, China try to downplay it, ostensibly because that way, terrorists and their sponsor(s) will have less info on what methods China uses to target them.
 
tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
coolgod said:
Actually they do. They needed the CIA help in the 1950s, they still needed the CIA help now, check out who still funds the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA).

Look up 1959 Tibetan armed rebellion, where do you think the insurgents got their supplies and instructions from? Across the border in India.
What do you think the CTA do? They are a separatist organization funded by India based in dhramasala.

You know China intentionally hides terrorist attacks within China right? You don't think Uighurs were all peaceful then suddenly China decided to reeducated them right? Similarly there were terrorist bombing attacks by Zang ethnicity groups less than 15 years ago, which are also kept hidden intentionally. Who do you think funds and support them, take a guess.

Have you noticed the western propaganda shifted from destabilizing Xinjiang to destabilizing Xizang again? Also an odd coincidence US and India are getting closer and signing more shared intelligence agreements.
Click to expand...

All this seems to be a lot of speculations.

Is this on same level as SCS weibo rumors that you posted?

Feel free to keep getting upset by these kind of things. Not something that bothers me at all.

The day that India military/security establishment actually shows some level of competence is the day I actually get worried about this. Until then, Pakistan military alone is enough to neutralize India
 
R

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
tphuang said:
All this seems to be a lot of speculations.

Is this on same level as SCS weibo rumors that you posted?

Feel free to keep getting upset by these kind of things. Not something that bothers me at all.

The day that India military/security establishment actually shows some level of competence is the day I actually get worried about this. Until then, Pakistan military alone is enough to neutralize India
Click to expand...
If Pakistan military can really neutralize india, they would get kashmir already. India military incompetency is well known, but their intentions of hostility against china is very clear.
 
tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
resistance said:
If Pakistan military can really neutralize india, they would get kashmir already. India military incompetency is well known, but their intentions of hostility against china is very clear.
Click to expand...
that's nonsense. You can't just launch wars because you are militarily capable of doing so
 
tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
resistance said:
India just ignite galwan valley clash 3 years ago.
Click to expand...
And that went nowhere. Internationally, you can't just start conflict and take land without international condemnation. I really doubt Pakistan is at a position to deal with international condemnation

But if you look at its military assets, it has clear advantages in ground/air force vs India.
 
R

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
tphuang said:
And that went nowhere. Internationally, you can't just start conflict and take land without international condemnation. I really doubt Pakistan is at a position to deal with international condemnation

But if you look at its military assets, it has clear advantages in ground/air force vs India.
Click to expand...
India also still occupied southern Tibet ( a large portion of Chinese territory). International condemnation doesn't do a damn thing when siding with America.

You can see how Chinese gov reaction with Myanmar hosting telescamer. Why would china tolerate india which host both separatist and occupied Chinese territory?

China won't let India in SCO if Russia isn't stupid to bring India in. Any Global south cooperation is always good for china when there's no turkey India or Philippines in.
 
tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
resistance said:
India also still occupied southern Tibet ( a large portion of Chinese territory). International condemnation doesn't do a damn thing when siding with America.

You can see how Chinese gov reaction with Myanmar hosting telescamer. Why would china tolerate india which host both separatist and occupied Chinese territory?

China won't let India in SCO if Russia isn't stupid to bring India in. Any Global south cooperation is always good for china when there's no turkey India or Philippines in.
Click to expand...
that's called a territorial dispute. India also thinks China is occupying its territory.

I think the real issue here is whether or not India actually poses a thread.

And my contention is that Pakistan neutralizes that threat. Instead of answering that question in military terms, you are just continuing with India is bad.

Okay, so India is watching out for its own interests, because it is at a weak position and needs Western help against increasingly wide gap in military power between itself and China/Pakistan. That makes sense to me.

Are you going to be concerned about a weak security state? I'm not.

I'm just going to want to see this plays out and see how AI taking call center jobs will affect India's economy.
 
R

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
tphuang said:
that's called a territorial dispute. India also thinks China is occupying its territory.

I think the real issue here is whether or not India actually poses a thread.

And my contention is that Pakistan neutralizes that threat. Instead of answering that question in military terms, you are just continuing with India is bad.

Okay, so India is watching out for its own interests, because it is at a weak position and needs Western help against increasingly wide gap in military power between itself and China/Pakistan. That makes sense to me.

Are you going to be concerned about a weak security state? I'm not.

I'm just going to want to see this plays out and see how AI taking call center jobs will affect India's economy.
Click to expand...
Taiwan Japan and south Korea themselves can't pose threat to china, but they can with the US support. The same apply to India.

The most things to concerned about is India security contradict with Chinese security which not gonna go well for cooperation like SCO that have security as a primary goal. This is why India being trojan for US favor. A huge Russian mistake.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top